Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Fun first, useful later: Mobile learning acceptance among secondary school students in Indonesia

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As mobile devices become more ubiquitous, the benefits of mobile learning (m-learning) can be a great opportunity for educating a vast populace, especially in developing countries. Acceptance of m-learning by individuals is critical for these nations while aiming for a successful implementation of m-learning. A total of 1156 middle and high school students in Indonesia participated in this study to investigate factors determining m-learning acceptance among adolescents and to discover the effects of sex, age group, and location differences with the technology acceptance model (TAM) as a theoretical framework. The results indicate that all seven factors in the model are significant determinants of m-learning acceptance with some moderation effects by sex, age, and location differences at play. While the literature showed the importance of perceived usefulness in technology acceptance, including in the m-learning case, this study found that its effect is far less influential than perceived enjoyment and social influence, inferring the irrationality of adolescents in their intention of using m-learning. Perceived mobility value and perceived usefulness, while showing much smaller effects than shown in the literature, are still influential in m-learning acceptance, especially for female and high school students and not necessarily for male and middle school students. Meanwhile, facilitating conditions are crucial in helping female, middle school students, and students in rural areas adopt m-learning. This study helps understand unique characteristics of adolescents as a younger generation that separate them from adults when it comes to their acceptance of m-learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alarcón, D., & Sánchez, J. A. (2015). Assessing convergent and discriminant validity in the ADHD-R IV rating scale: User-written commands for average variance extracted (AVE), composite reliability (CR), and Heterotrait-Monotrait ratio of correlations (HTMT). In Spanish STATA Meeting.

  • Bosacki, S. L. (2005). Education, entertainment, and learning in the home. Education and Information Technologies, 10(1–2), 129–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-005-6752-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beranuy, M., Oberst, U., Carbonell, X., & Chamarro, A. (2009). Problematic internet and mobile phone use and clinical symptoms in college students: The role of emotional intelligence. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(5), 1182–1187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crompton, H. (2013). A historical overview of mobile learning: Toward learner-centered education. Handbook of mobile learning, 3-14.

  • Chugh, R. (2010). E-learning tools and their impact on pedagogy. In D. S. Ubha & J. Kaur (Eds.), Emerging paradigms in commerce and management education (pp. 58–81). Patiala, India: GSSDGS Khalsa College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 382–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgiev, T., Georgieva, E., & Smrikarov, A. (2004, June). M-learning-a new stage of Е-learning. In International conference on computer systems and technologies-CompSysTech, 4(28), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, R., & Giles, S. (2003). Social support provision and cultural values in Indonesia and Britain. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34(2), 240–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimus, M., Ebner, M., & Holzinger, A. (2012). Mobile learning as a chance to enhance education in developing countries-on the example of Ghana. In mLearn (pp. 340-345).

  • Hadlington, L. J. (2015). Cognitive failures in daily life: Exploring the link with internet addiction and problematic mobile phone use. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 75–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. T., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1992). Multivariate data analysis with readings (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J. H., Lin, Y. R., & Chuang, S. T. (2007). Elucidating user behavior of mobile learning: A perspective of the extended technology acceptance model. The Electronic Library, 25(5), 585–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, G. J., Wu, P. H., & Ke, H. R. (2011). An interactive concept map approach to supporting mobile learning activities for natural science courses. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2272–2280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kates, A. W., Wu, H., & Coryn, C. L. (2018). The effects of mobile phone use on academic performance: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 127, 107–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, S. (2015). Social, Digital & Mobile Worldwide in 2015. Retrieved from http://wearesocial.com/uk/special-reports/social-digital-mobile-worldwide-2015

  • Kemp, S. (2017). Digital in 2017: Global Review. Retrieved from http://wearesocial.com/blog/2017/01/digital-in-2017-global-overview

  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th editions). New York.

  • Korucu, A. T., & Alkan, A. (2011). Differences between m-learning (mobile learning) and e-learning, basic terminology and usage of m-learning in education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1925–1930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laouris, Y., & Eteokleous, N. (2005). We need an educationally relevant definition of mobile learning. In Proceedings of mLearn (Vol. 2005).

  • Magsamen-Conrad, K., Upadhyaya, S., Joa, C. Y., & Dowd, J. (2015). Bridging the divide: Using UTAUT to predict multigenerational tablet adoption practices. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 186–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, F., & Ertzberger, J. (2013). Here and now mobile learning: An experimental study on the use of mobile technology. Computers & Education, 68, 76–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motlik, S. (2008). Mobile learning in developing nations. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 9(2):

  • Mouza, C., & Barrett-Greenly, T. (2015). Bridging the app gap: An examination of a profes-sional development initiative on mobile learning in urban schools. Computers & Education, 88, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.04.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikolopoulou, K., & Gialamas, V. (2018). Mobile phone dependence: Secondary school pupils’ attitudes. Education and Information Technologies., 23, 2821–2839. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9743-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ofosu-Ampong, K., Boateng, R., Anning-Dorson, T., & Kolog, E. A. (2020). Are we ready for Gamification? An exploratory analysis in a developing country. Education and Information Technologies, 25(3), 1723–1742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okan, Z. (2003). Edutainment: Is learning at risk? British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(3), 255–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozuorcun, N. C., & Tabak, F. (2012). Is m-learning versus e-learning or are they supporting each other? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 299–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, S. Y., Nam, M. W., & Cha, S. B. (2012). University students' behavioral intention to use mobile learning: Evaluating the technology acceptance model. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 592–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratama, A. R. (2017, March). Cross-country analysis of ICT and education indicators: An exploratory study. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 185, no. 1, p. 012006). IOP Publishing.

  • Pratama, A. R., & Scarlatos, L. (2020a). The roles of device ownership and infrastructure in promoting E-learning and M-learning in Indonesia. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 12(4).

  • Pratama, A. R., & Scarlatos, L. (2020b). Ownership and use of Mobile devices among adolescents in Indonesia. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 48(3).

  • Pratama, A.R., & Firmansyah, F. (2020). How Can Governments Nudge Students to Become Ebook Readers? Evidence from Indonesia [Manuscript submitted for publication]. Department of Informatics, Universitas Islam Indonesia.

  • Ralston, D. A., Egri, C. P., Furrer, O., Kuo, M. H., Li, Y., Wangenheim, F., et al. (2014). Societal-level versus individual-level predictions of ethical behavior: A 48-society study of collectivism and individualism. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(2), 283–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, M. (2004). Edutainment? No thanks. I prefer playful learning. Associazione Civita Report on Edutainment, 14, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidik, D., & Syafar, F. (2020). Exploring the factors influencing student’s intention to use mobile learning in Indonesia higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 1-16.

  • Statista. (2019). Global smartphone penetration rate as share of population from 2016 to 2020. In Statista - The Statistics Portal. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/203734/global-smartphone-penetration-per-capita-since-2005/

  • Statista. (2020). Mobile phone internet user penetration in Indonesia from 2015 to 2025. In Statista - The Statistics Portal. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/309017/indonesia-mobile-phone-internet-user-penetration/

  • Sung, E., & Mayer, R. E. (2013). Online multimedia learning with mobile devices and desktop computers: An experimental test of Clark’s methods-not-media hypothesis. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 639–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabuenca, B., Kalz, M., Drachsler, H., & Specht, M. (2015). Time will tell: The role of mobile learning analytics in self-regulated learning. Computers & Education, 89, 53–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The World Bank. (2020a). Population, total - Indonesia. [Data file]. Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL?locations=ID

  • The World Bank. (2020b). GDP per capita (current US$) - Indonesia. [Data file]. Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD?locations=ID

  • Triandis, H. C., McCusker, C., Betancourt, H., Iwao, S., Leung, K., Salazar, J. M., Setiadi, B., Sinha, J. B. P., Touzard, H., & Zaleski, Z. (1993). An etic-emic analysis of individualism and collectivism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 24(3), 366–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., & Morris, M. G. (2000). Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24, 115–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 425-478.

  • Wang, Y. S., Wu, M. C., & Wang, H. Y. (2009). Investigating the determinants and age and sex differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 92–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zebroff, D., & Kaufman, D. (2016). Texting, reading, and other daily habits associated with adolescents’ literacy levels. Education and Information Technologies, 22(5), 2197–2216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9544-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Informatics, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Sleman, D.I. Yogyakarta, Indonesia

    Ahmad R. Pratama

Authors
  1. Ahmad R. Pratama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmad R. Pratama.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 8.

Table 8 Original survey items used in the study
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pratama, A.R. Fun first, useful later: Mobile learning acceptance among secondary school students in Indonesia. Educ Inf Technol 26, 1737–1753 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10334-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10334-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation