Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A meta-analysis of the impact of mobile learning on mathematics achievement

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The technological developments of the twenty-first century have enabled the emergence of alternative teaching-learning models and instructional tools. One of the concepts brought about by such developments is mobile learning. The aim of this study was to test the effect of mobile learning on students’ mathematics achievement. A systematic database search that included the Academic Search Complete, Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), EBSCO, JSTOR, ScienceDirect, Taylor & Francis Online, and Web of Science was carried out to examine peer-reviewed articles that met the inclusion criteria. A total of 22 quantitative research papers published between 2010 and 2020 were included in the meta-analysis. The results show that mobile learning has a medium-level positive effect (g = 0.476; p < .001; with a 95% confidence interval of 0.335–0.616) on students’ mathematics achievement. Moderator analyses showed that the effect sizes were not significantly moderated by grade level and implementer, while content area was found to be a moderator. Based on the results, some suggestions are offered for future studies in designed learning environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Note: (* marked references are the studies that are included in the meta-analysis)

  • Açıkgül, K., & Şad, S. N. (2021). High school students’ acceptance and use of mobile technology in learning mathematics. Education and Information Technologies, 1–21.

  • Al-Qahtani, A. A. Y., & Higgins, S. E. (2013). Effects of traditional, blended and e-learning on students’ achievement in higher education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(3), 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00490.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ally, M. (Ed.). (2009). Mobile learning: Transforming the delivery of education and training. Athabasca University Press.

  • Attewell, J. (2005). Mobile technologies and learning. Learning and Skills Development Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, E. J., Bakar, J. A. A., & Zulkufli, A. N. (2018). Engagement elements for mobile augmented reality application. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.20), 800–805.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baek, E. O., & Guo, Q. (2019). Instructional design principles for mobile learning. In Y. A. Zhang & D. Cristol (Eds.), Handbook of Mobile Teaching and Learning (pp. 1–22). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bano, M., Zowghi, D., Kearney, M., Schuck, S., & Aubusson, P. (2018). Mobile learning for science and mathematics school education: A systematic review of empirical evidence. Computers & Education, 121, 30–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begg, C. B., & Berlin, J. A. (1988). Publication bias: A problem in interpreting medical data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society), 151(3), 419–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belland, B. R., Walker, A. E., Kim, N. J., & Lefler, M. (2017). Synthesizing results from empirical research on computer-based scaffolding in STEM education: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 87(2), 309–344. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316670999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borba, M. C., Askar, P., Engelbrecht, J., Gadanidis, G., Llinares, S., & Aguilar, M. S. (2016). Blended learning, e-learning and mobile learning in mathematics education. ZDM, 48(5), 589–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0798-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2021). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. H. (2005). Towards a model for m-learning in Africa. International Journal of ELearning, 4(3), 299–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, J. (2014). Can tablet computers enhance learning in further education? Journal of Further and Higher Education, 40(2), 207–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Cai, S.; Liu, E.; Shen, Y.; Liu, C.; Li, S.; Shen, Y. (2020) Probability learning in mathematics using augmented reality: Impact on student’s learning gains and attitudes. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(5), 560–573, https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1696839.

  • Calder, N., Larkin, K., & Sinclair, N. (2018). Mobile technologies: How might using mobile technologies reshape the learning and teaching of mathematics? In I. N. Calder, K. Larkin, & N. Sinclair (Eds.), Using Mobile Technologies in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics (pp. 1–7). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Carr, J. M. (2012). Does math achievement h’APP’en when iPads and game-based learning are incorporated into fifth-grade mathematics instruction?. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 11, 269–285.

  • Castillo-Merino, D., & Serradell-López, E. (2014). An analysis of the determinants of students’ performance in e-learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 476–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro, M., Expósito-Casas, E., López-Martín, E., Lizasoain, L., NavarroAsencio, E., & Gaviria, J. L. (2015). Parental involvement on student achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 14, 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.01.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Çetinkaya, L. (2019). The effects of problem based mathematics teaching through mobile applications on success. Education and Science, 44(197), 65–84.

  • *Chang, K. E., Wu, L. J., Lai, S. C., & Sung, Y. T. (2016). Using mobile devices to enhance the interactive learning for spatial geometry. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(4), 916–934. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.948458.

  • Chee, K. N., Yahaya, N., Ibrahim, N. H., & Hasan, M. N. (2017). Review of mobile learning trends 2010-2015: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(2), 113–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2017). Readiness for integrating mobile learning in the classroom: Challenges, preferences and possibilities. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, D., & Churchill, N. (2008). Educational affordances of PDAs: A study of a teacher's exploration of this technology. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1439–1450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciampa, K. (2014). Learning in a mobile age: An investigation of student motivation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(1), 82–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Criollo-C, S., Luján-Mora, S., & Jaramillo-Alcázar, A. (2018, March). Advantages and disadvantages of m-learning in current education. Paper presented at the IEEE World Engineering Education Conference (EDUNINE), , Argentina.

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Erlbaum.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Danişman, Ş., & Tanışlı, D. (2017). Examination of mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of probability. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(2), 16–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Etcuban, J. O., & Pantinople, L. D. (2018). The effects of Mobile application in teaching high school mathematics International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(3), 249-259. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3906.

  • *Fabian, K., Topping, K. J. (2019). Putting “mobile” into mathematics: Results of a randomised controlled trial. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 59, 1–12.

  • *Fabian, K., Topping, K. J., & Barron, I. G. (2018). Using mobile technologies for mathematics: Effects on student attitudes and achievement. Educational Technology Research and Development, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9580-3, 66.

  • Fast, L. A., Lewis, J. L., Bryant, M. J., Bocian, K. A., Cardullo, R. A., Rettig, M., & Hammond, K. A. (2010). Does math self-efficacy mediate the effect of the perceived classroom environment on standardized math test performance? Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 729–740. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Fößl, T., Ebner, M., Schön, S., & Holzinger, A. (2016). A field study of a video supported seamless-learning-setting with elementary learners. Educational Technology & Society, 19(1), 321–336.

  • France, D., Lee, R., Maclachlan, J., & McPhee, S. R. (2021). Should you be using mobile technologies in teaching? Applying a pedagogical framework. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 45(2), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, T., & Peng, L.-W. (2008). Mobile math: Math educators and students engage in mobile learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 20(2), 69–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furio, D., Juan, M.-C., Seguí, I., & Vivo, R. (2014). Mobile learning vs. traditional classroom lessons: A comparative study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(3), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, S. G., Seymour, T. L., & Anderson, B. R. (2016). Achieving the performance benefits of hands-on experience when using digital devices: A representational approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 58–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, J. P., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Bmj, 327(7414), 557–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y. M., Kuo, Y. H., Lin, Y. T., & Cheng, S. C. (2008). Toward interactive mobile synchronous learning environment with context-awareness service. Computers and Education, 51(3), 1205–1226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hung, I. C., Yang, X. J., Fang, W. C., Hwang, G. J., & Chen, N. S. (2014). A context-aware video prompt approach to improving students' in-field reflection levels. Computers & Education, 70, 80–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Hwang, G.-J., & Lai, C.-L. (2017). Facilitating and bridging out-of-class and in-class learning: An interactive E-book-based flipped learning approach for math courses. Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 184–197.

  • *Jelatu, S., Kurniawan, Y., Kurnila, V. S., Mandur, K., & Jundu, R. (2019). Collaboration TPS learning model and m-learning based on android for understanding of trigonometry concepts with different cognitive style International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 545-560. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12435a.

  • Jeno, L. M., Vandvik, V., Eliassen, S., & Grytnes, J. A. (2019). Testing the novelty effect of an m-learning tool on internalization and achievement: A self-determination theory approach. Computers & Education, 128, 398–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joo-Nagata, J., Abad, F. M., Garcia-Bermejo Giner, J. & Garcia-Penalvo, F. J. (2017). Augmented reality and pedestrian navigation through its implementation in m-learning and e-learning: Evaluation of an educational program in Chile. Computers and Education, 111, 1–17, 1.

  • Kearney, M., Burden, K., & Schuck, S. (2020). Rationale for a Mobile pedagogical framework. In Theorising and implementing Mobile learning (pp. 53–69). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keegan, D. (2005). Theoretical principles of distance education. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keengwe, J., & Bhargava, M. (2014). Mobile learning and integration of mobile technologies in education. Education and Information Technologies, 19(4), 737–746.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Kiger, D., Herro, D., & Prunty, D. (2012). Examining the influence of a mobile learning intervention on third grade math achievement. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(1), 61–82.

  • Kluge, A., & Dolonen, J. (2015). Using mobile games in the classroom. In H. Crompton & J. Traxler (Eds.), Mobile Learning and Mathematics: Foundations, Design, and Case Studies (pp. 106–121). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyriakides, A. O., Meletiou-Mavrotheris, M., & Prodromou, T. (2016). Mobile technologies in the service of students’ learning of mathematics: The example of game application ALEX in the context of a primary school in Cyprus. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 28(1), 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-015-0163-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Lan, Y. J., Sung, Y. T., Tan, N. C., Lin, C. P., & Chang, K. E. (2010). Mobile-device-supported problem-based computational estimation instruction for elementary school students. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 55–69.

  • Larkin, K., & Milford, T. (2018). Mathematics apps—Stormy with the weather clearing: Using cluster analysis to enhance app use in mathematics classrooms. In N. Calder, K. Larkin, & N. Sinclair (Eds.), Using mobile technologies in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 11–30). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, L. (2007). Unwillingness-to-communicate and college students' motives in SMS mobile messaging. Telematics and Informatics, 24(2), 115–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Liu, N. (2013). Ipad infuse creativity in solid geometry teaching. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(2), 177–192.

  • Lo, C. K., Hew, K. F., & Chen, G. (2017). Toward a set of design principles for mathematics flipped classrooms: A synthesis of research in mathematics education. Educational Research Review, 22, 50–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Looi, C. K., So, H. J., Chen, W., Zhang, B., Wong, L. H., & Seow, P. (2012). Seamless learning. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_251.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shank, D. B., & Cotten, S. R. (2014). Does technology empower urban youth? The relationship of technology use to self-efficacy. Computers and Education, 70, 184–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.08.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moh, C. (2013). Development and assessment of Mobile device support for certification exam preparation (Doctoral dissertation, Nova Southeastern University).

  • *Miller, T. (2018). Developing numeracy skills using interactive technology in a play-based learning environment. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0135-2, 39.

  • Mishra, S. K. (2013). Quality education for children, youth, and adults through mobile learning. In J. Keengwe (Ed). Pedagogical Applications and Social Effects of Mobile Technology Integration (pp. 225–237). IGI Global.

  • Namukasa I. K., Gadanidis G., Sarina V., Scucuglia S., & Aryee K. (2016). Selection of apps for teaching difficult mathematics topics: An instrument to evaluate touch-screen tablet and smartphone mathematics spps. In P. Moyer-Packenham (Ed.), International perspectives on teaching and learning mathematics with virtual manipulatives (pp 275–300). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32718-1_12

  • *Outhwaite, L. A., Faulder, M., Gulliford, A., and Pitchford, N. J. (2018). Raising early achievement in math with interactive apps: A randomized control trial. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(2), 284–298. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000286.

  • Ozcelik, E., & Acarturk, C. (2011). Reducing the spatial distance between printed and online information sources by means of mobile technology enhances learning: Using 2D barcodes. Computers & Education, 57(3), 2077–2085.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Ozdal, H., & Ozdamli, F. (2017). The effect of infographics in mobile learning: Case study in primary school. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 23(12), 1256–1275.

  • Pandey, K., & Singh, N. (2015). Mobile learning: Critical pedagogy to education for all. In Y. Zhang (Ed.), Handbook of Mobile teaching and learning (pp. 107–132). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Park, J., Parsons, D., & Ryu, H. (2010). To flow and not to freeze: Applying flow experience to mobile learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 3(1), 56–67.

  • Park, Y. (2011). A pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(2), 78–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pegrum, M. (2019). Mobile lenses on learning. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, K. (2007). M-learning: Positioning educators for a mobile, connected future. International Journal of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(2), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollara, P. (2011). Mobile learning in higher education: A glimpse and a comparison of student and faculty readiness, attitudes and perceptions (Doctoral dissertation). Louisiana State University.

  • Prensky, M. (2005). Adopt and adapt school technology in the 21st century. http://www.edutopia.org/adopt-and-adapt-shaping-tech-for-classroom

  • Qu, J. (2021). Research on mobile learning in a teaching information service system based on a big data driven environment. Education and Information Technologies, 1–19.

  • *Reeves, J. L., Gunter, G. A., & Lacey, C. (2017). Mobile learning in pre-kindergarten: Using student feedback to inform practice. Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 37–44.

  • *Riconscente, M. M. (2013). Results from a controlled study of the iPad fractions game motion math. Games and Culture, 8, 186–214.

  • Rosenthal, R. (1979). The “file drawer problem” and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossing, J., Miller, W., Cecil, A., & Stamper, S. (2012). iLearning : The future of higher education? Student perceptions on learning with mobile tablets. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 12(2), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sam, L. C., & Ernest, P. (2000). A survey of public images of mathematics. Research in Mathematics Education, 2(1), 193–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuck, S., Kearney, M., & Burden, K. (2017). Exploring mobile learning in the third space. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(2), 121–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuck, S., & Maher, D. (2018). Creating opportunities for untethered learning. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 27(4), 473–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2018.1510788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharples, M., Corlett, D., & Westmancott, O. (2002). The design and implementation of a mobile learning resource. Personal Ubiquitous Computing, 6(3), 220–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Shih, S.-C., Kuo, B.-C., & Liu, Y.-L. (2012). Adaptively ubiquitous learning in campus math path. Educational Technology & Society, 15(2), 298–308.

  • Singh, K., Granville, M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(6), 323–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skiada, R., Soroniati, E., Gardeli, A., & Zissis, D. (2014). EasyLexia: A mobile application for children with learning difficulties. Procedia Computer Science, 27, 218–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommerauer, P., & Müller, O. (2014). Augmented reality in informal learning environments: A field experiment in a mathematics exhibition. Computers and Education, 79, 59–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stead, G., Sharpe, B., Anderson, P., Cych, L., & Philpott, M. (2006). Emerging technologies for learning. Becta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, D., & Kitchenham, A. (2011). An analysis of mobile learning in education, business, and medicine. In A. Kitchenham (Ed.) Models for interdisciplinary mobile learning: Delivering information to students (pp. 1–25). IGI Global.

  • Straub, E. T. (2009). Understanding technology adoption: Theory and future directions for informal learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 625–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, J. C.-Y. (2014). Influence of polling technologies on student engagement: An analysis of student motivation, academic performance, and brainwave data. Computers and Education, 72, 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Liu, T. C. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students' learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talan, T. (2020). The effect of Mobile learning on learning performance: A meta-analysis study. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 20(1), 79–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thalheimer, W., & Cook, S. (2002). How to calculate effect sizes from published research: A simplified methodology. Work-Learning Research, 1, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, S. (2005). Pervasive, persuasive eLearning: Modeling the pervasive learning space. Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on pervasive computing and communications workshops (PERCOMW’05) (pp. 332–336). Kauai Island, Hawai’i: IEEE Computer Society.

  • Tingir, S., Cavlazoglu, B., Caliskan, O., Koklu, O., & Intepe-Tingir, S. (2017). Effects of mobile devices on K–12 students' achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(4), 355–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traxler, J. (2005, June). Defining mobile learning. Paper presented at ADIS international conference Mobile learning, Qawra, . (Retrieved January 6, 2012 from http://www.iadis.net/dl/final_uploads/200506C018.pdf).

  • Trifonova, A. (2003). Mobile learning: Review of the literature. Technical Report DIT-03-009, Informatica e Telecomunicazioni, University of .

  • Trinder, K., Guiller, J., Marggaryan, N., Littlejohn, A., & Nicol, D. (2008). Learning from digital natives: Bridging formal and informal learning. Glasgow Caledonian University, The Higher Education Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R. (2013). “I don’t think I would be where I am right now”. Pupil perspectives on using mobile devices for learning. Research in Learning Technology, 21, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, D. M. (2013). Mobile learning: Transforming education, engaging students, and improving outcomes. Center for Technology Innovation at Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, W. H., Wu, Y. C. J., Chen, C. Y., Kao, H. Y., Lin, C. H., & Huang, S. H. (2012). Review of trends from mobile learning studies: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 59(2), 817–827.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Yeh. C. Y., Hercy N. H. Cheng, Zhi-Hong Chen, Calvin C. Y. Liao and Tak-Wai Chan. (2019). Enhancing achievement and interest in mathematics learning through Math-Island. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 14(1), 1–19.

  • *Zhang, L., Shang, J., Pelton, T., & Pelton, L. F. (2020). Supporting primary students' learning of fraction conceptual knowledge through digital games. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(4), 540–548. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12422.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mathematics Education, Fatih Faculty of Education, Trabzon University, Trabzon, Turkey

    Mustafa Güler & Kadir Gürsoy

  2. Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Education, Yozgat Bozok University, Yozgat, Turkey

    Suphi Önder Bütüner

  3. Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Education, Düzce University, Düzce, Turkey

    Şahin Danişman

Authors
  1. Mustafa Güler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Suphi Önder Bütüner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Şahin Danişman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kadir Gürsoy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mustafa Güler.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Güler, M., Bütüner, S.Ö., Danişman, Ş. et al. A meta-analysis of the impact of mobile learning on mathematics achievement. Educ Inf Technol 27, 1725–1745 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10640-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10640-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation