Abstract
Open-source software movement presents a viable alternative to commercial operating systems. Linux-based operating systems are freely available and a competitive option for computer users who want full control of their computer software. Thus, it is relevant to inquire on how the open-source movement might influence user technology switching intentions. The current study examines user intentions to switch to a Linux-based open-source operating system. Using partial least squares modeling, we examine the influence of inertia, (i.e., status quo bias), benefit loss costs, incumbent systems habit, procedural switching costs, sunk costs, social norms, and uncertainty costs, on perceived need and behavioral intention. We find that Perceived Need and Behavioral Intention (β = 0.691, p < 0.001) exhibited the strongest relationship followed by Social Norms on Perceived Need (β = 0.508, p < 0.001) and Uncertainty Costs on Inertia (β = 0.451, p < 0.001), with small effects from Incumbent System Habit and Perceived Switching Cost on Inertia as well. As cross-sectional research, no causal interpretations are permitted. Modelling user switching intentions can help facilitate user service design and software documentation efforts by concentrating on user needs. Overall, we find that the results support inertial effects and the influence of social norms on perceived need and users’ switching intentions. Implications of these findings are also discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior And Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2005). The influence of attitudes on behavior. In D. Ablracin, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 173–221). Taylor & Francis.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prenctice Hall.
Bansal, H. S., Taylor, S. F., & St. James, Y. (2005). “Migrating” to new service providers: Toward a unifying framework of consumers’ switching behaviors. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(1), 96–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070304267928
Bargh, J. A., & Ferguson, M. J. (2000). Beyond behaviorism: On the automaticity of higher mental processes. Psychological Bulletin, 126(6), 925–945. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.6.925
Bhattacherjee, A., & Premkumar, G. (2004). Understanding changes in belief and attitude toward information technology usage: A theoretical model and longitudinal test. MIS Quarterly, 28(2), 229. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148634
Bhattacherjee, A., Limayem, M., & Cheung, C. M. K. (2012). User switching of information technology: A theoretical synthesis and empirical test. Information & Management, 49(7–8), 327–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2012.06.002
Daniel, S. L., Maruping, L. K., Cataldo, M., & Jin Herbsleb, J. (2018). The impact of ideology misfit on open source software communities and companies. MIS Quarterly, 42(4), 1069–1096. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2018/14242
Doleck, T., Bazelais, P., & Lemay, D. (2016). Examining CEGEP students’ acceptance of computer-based learning environments: A test of two models. Education And Information Technologies, 22(5), 2523–2543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9559-9
Fan, L., & Suh, Y.-H. (2014). Why do users switch to a disruptive technology? An empirical study based on expectation-disconfirmation theory. Information & Management, 51(2), 240–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2013.12.004
Finley, K. (2016). Linux took over the Web. Now, It's Taking Over the World. Wired. Retrieved from: https://www.wired.com/2016/08/linux-took-web-now-taking-world/
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2011). Predicting and changing behavior. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203838020
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
Gerlach, J., Schmidt, S., & Buxmann, P. (2014). (I Can’t Get No) Satisfaction: Investigating the Role of Goal Value and Mood in Habitual Technology Use. In Thirty Fifth International Conference on Information Systems, 2014 1.
Gong, X., Zhang, K. Z. K., Chen, C., Cheung, C. M. K., & Lee, M. K. O. (2020). Transition from web to mobile payment services: The triple effects of status quo inertia. International Journal of Information Management, 50, 310–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.006
Greeno, J. G. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.1.5
Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-09-2015-0382
Jensen, R. (2019). Unix at 50: How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure, Ars Technica, Retrieved from: https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2019/08/unix-at-50-it-starts-with-a-mainframe-a-gator-and-three-dedicated-researchers/
Kim, H.-W., & Kankanhalli, A. (2009). Investigating user resistance to information systems implementation: A status quo bias perspective. MIS Quarterly, 33(3), 567–582.
Kock, N. (2017). WarpPLS. Retrieved from http://www.warppls.com
Kock, N. (2018). WarpPLS 5.0 user manual. ScripWarp Systems. Retrieved from http://cits.tamiu.edu/WarpPLS/UserManual_v_6_0.pdf
Kuo, R.-Z. (2020). Why do people switch mobile payment service platforms? An empirical study in Taiwan. Technology in Society, 62, 101312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101312
Kuwabara, K. (2000). Linux: A bazaar at the edge of chaos. First Monday, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v5i3.731
Lemay, D., Doleck, T., & Bazelais, P. (2017). Passion and concern for privacy as factors affecting snapchat use: A situated perspective on technology acceptance. Computers In Human Behavior, 75, 264–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.022
Lemay, D., Doleck, T., & Bazelais, P. (2018). The influence of the social, cognitive, and instructional dimensions on technology acceptance decisions among College-Level students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(12), em1635. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/97192
Lemay, D., Doleck, T., & Bazelais, P. (2019). Context and technology use: Opportunities and challenges of the situated perspective in technology acceptance research. British Journal Of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2450–2465. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12859
Leventhal, H. (1970). Findings and theory in the study of fear communications. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 119–186). Academic Press.
Limayem, M., Hirt, S., & Cheung, C. (2007). How habit limits the predictive power of intention: The case of information systems continuance. MIS Quarterly, 31(4), 705. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148817
Liu, Y., Li, H., Xu, X., Kostakos, V., & Heikkilä, J. (2016). Modeling consumer switching behavior in social network games by exploring consumer cognitive dissonance and change experience. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(4), 801–820. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-05-2015-0170
Margan, D., & Candrlic, S. (2015). The success of open source software: A review. In 2015 38th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO) (pp. 1463–1468). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIPRO.2015.7160503
Martin, R., & Hewstone, M. (2001). Conformity and independence in groups: Majorities and minorities. Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes, 1, 209–234.
Martin, R., & Hewstone, M. (2007). Social-influence processes of control and change: Conformity, obedience to authority, and innovation. In M. A. Hogg & J. Cooper (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social psychology: Concise (Student ed., pp. 321–334). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608221
Menabrea, L., Babbage, C., & Lovelace, A., Countess. (1843). Sketch of the analytical engine invented by charles babbage ... with notes by the translator. extracted from the 'scientific memoirs, ' etc. [the translator's notes signed: A.l.l. ie. augusta ada king, countess lovelace.]. R. & J.E. Taylor.
Nykänen, J. I., Tuunainen, V. K., & Tuunanen, T. (2015). A research agenda for evaluating strength of internal preferences and external influences in consumer smartphone switching. In IRIS 38: Proceedings of the 38th information systems research seminar in Scandinavia. Oulu, Finland: Oulun yliopisto.
Reicher, S. (2008). The psychology of crowds in G. Stasser & B. Dietz-Uhler (Eds.) Collective Choice, Judgment, and Problem Solving: Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes, 209–234. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470998458.ch9
Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.68
Silic, M., & Back, A. (2017). Open source software adoption: Lessons from Linux in Munich. IT Professional, 19(1), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.1109/mitp.2017.7
Stasser, G., & Dietz-Uhler, B. (2001). Collective choice, judgment, and problem solving. Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes, 3, 31–55.
Tao, D., Wang, T., Wang, T., Zhang, T., Zhang, X., & Qu, X. (2020). A systematic review and meta-analysis of user acceptance of consumer-oriented health information technologies. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.023
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
van Vliet, H. (2008). Software Engineering: Principles and practice (3rd). Wiley.
Vaughan-Nichols, S. (2020). Most popular operating systems of 2020: The more things change... | ZDNet. Retrieved 8 May 2021, from https://www.zdnet.com/article/whats-2020s-most-popular-operating-systems/
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., & Davis, F. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
von Krogh, G., & Spaeth, S. (2007). The open source software phenomenon: Characteristics that promote research. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 16(3), 236–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2007.06.001
Wang, Y.-Y., Wang, Y.-S., & Lin, T.-C. (2018). Developing and validating a technology upgrade model. International Journal of Information Management, 38(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.07.003
World Wide Web Foundation. (2018). A contract for the web. Retrieved from: https://contractfortheweb.org/
Xiao, G., Zheng, Z., Yin, B., Trivedi, K., Du, X., & Cai, K. (2019). An empirical study of fault triggers in the Linux operating system: An evolutionary perspective. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 68(4), 1356–1383. https://doi.org/10.1109/tr.2019.2916204
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lemay, D.J., Basnet, R.B. & Doleck, T. Switching intentions in the context of open-source software movement: The paradox of choice. Educ Inf Technol 27, 1379–1395 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10646-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10646-5