Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis and characterization of comparison shopping behavior in the mobile handset domain

  • Published:
Electronic Commerce Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this work we characterize the session-level behavior of users on an Indian mobile phone comparison shopping website. We also correlate the popularity of handset on various news sources to its popularity on the shopping website. There are three aspects to our study: data analysis, correlation between news sources of product information and popularity of a handset, and behavior prediction. We have used KL divergence to show that a time-homogeneous Markov chain is observed when the number of clicks varies from 5 to 30. Our results depict that Markov chain model does not hold in entirety for comparison shopping setting but tells us how far the Markov chain model holds for this setting. Our analysis corroborates intuition that increasing price leads to decrease in popularity. After the strong correlation between various variables and user behavior was found, we predict the users macro (the overall sales of handset) and micro behavior (whether a user will convert or exit the site) using Markov logic networks. Our predictive model validates the intuition that past browsing behavior is an important predictor for future behavior. Methodology of combining data analysis with machine learning is, in our opinion, a new approach to the empirical study of such data sets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. eBizMBA. (2013). Top 15 most popular comparison shopping websites: May 2013. http://www.ebizmba.com/articles/shopping-websites.

  2. Chatterjee, P., & Wang, Y. (2012). Online comparison shopping behavior of travel consumers. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality and Tourism, 13(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kohavi, R., Brodley, C., Frasca, B., Mason, L., & Zhang, Z. (2000). KDD-Cup 2000 Organizers’ Report: Peeling the onion. SIGKDD Explorations, 2(2), 86–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Domingos, P., & Lowd, D. (2009). Markov logic: An interface layer for artificial intelligence. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gupta, M., Mittal, H., Singla, P., & Bagchi, A. (2014). Characterizing comparison shopping behavior: A case study. In Data engineering workshops (ICDEW).

  6. Sarukkai, R. R. (2000). Link prediction and path analysis using Markov chains. Computer Networks, 33(1–6), 337–386.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yates, R. B., Hurtando, C., Mendoza, M., & Dupret, G. (2005). Modeling user search behavior. In LA-WEB, Web congress.

  8. Deshpande, M., & Karypis, G. (2004). Selective Markov models for predicting web page accesses. ACM Transactions Internet Technology, 4(2), 163–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zukerman, I., Albrecht, D. W., & Nicholson, A. E. (1999). Predicting users’ requests on the WWW. In Proceedings of user modeling (pp. 275–284).

  10. Pirolli, P. L. T., & Pitkow, J. E. (1999). Distributions of surfers’ paths through the World Wide Web: Empirical characterizations. Journal World Wide Web, 2(1), 29–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sen, R., & Hansen, M. (2003). Predicting a web user’s next access based on log data. Journal of Computational Graphics and Statistics, 12, 143–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhu, J., Hong, J., & Hughes, J. G. (2002). Using Markov chains for link prediction in adaptive web sites. In Proceedings of Software 2002: Computing in an imperfect world (pp. 60–73).

  13. Cadez, I., Heckerman, D., Christopher, M., Padhraic, S., & Steven, W. (2000). Visualization of navigation patterns on a web site using model-based clustering. In Proceedings of conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 280–284).

  14. Li, J., & Sadagopan, N. (2008). Characterizing typical and atypical user sessions in clickstreams. In Proceedings of WWW’08.

  15. Levene, M., & Loizou, G. (2003). Computing the entropy of user navigation in the web. Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, 2, 459–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kullback, S., & Leibler, R. A. (1951). On information and sufficiency. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 22(1), 79–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wolfinbarger, M., & Gilly, M. (2000). Consumer motivations for online shopping. In Proceedings of the AMCIS 2000 (pp. 1362–1366), California.

  18. Moe, W. S., & Fader, P. S. (2004). Dynamic conversion behavior at E-commerce sites. Management Science, 50(3), 326–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mongomery, A. L., Li, S., Srinivasan, K., & Lichety, J. C. (2004). Modeling online browsing and path analysis using clickstream data. Marketing Science, 23(4), 579–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sismeiro, C., & Bucklin, R. E. (2004). Modeling purchase behavior at an E-commerce web site: A task completion approach. Journal of Marketing Research, 41(3), 306–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Brown, D., & Hayes, N. (2008). Influencer marketing: Who really influences your customers?. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Parikh, N., & Sundaresan, N. (2008). Scalable and near real-time burst detection from eCommerce queries. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 972–980).

  23. Zhang, H., Parikh, N., Singh, G., & Sundaresan, N. (2013). Chelsea won, and you bought a T-shirt: Characterizing the interplay between Twitter and e-Commerce. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/ACM international conference on advances in social networks analysis and mining (pp. 829–836).

  24. Zhang, Y., & Pennacchiotti, M. (2013). Predicting purchase behaviors from Social Media. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web (WWW’13).

  25. Nguyen, T. (2013, February). Q4 (2012) CSE rankings. http://www.cpcstrategy.com/blog/2013/02/q4-2012-cse-rankings/. Published by CPC Strategy.

  26. Goel, S., Hofman, J. M., Lahaie, S., Pennock, D. M., & Watts, D. J. (2010). Predicting consumer behavior with web search. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, 107(41), 17486–17490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Choi, H., & Varian, H. (2012). Predicting the present with Google trends. The Economic Record, 88, 2–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Massy, W. F., & Frank, R. E. (1985). Short term price and dealing effects in selected market segments. Journal of Marketing Research, 2, 171–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gilks, W. R., Richardson, S., & Spiegelhalter, D. J. (Eds.). (1996). Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pentland, A., & Lin, A. (1995). Modeling and prediction of human behavior. Neural Computation, 11, 229–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pentland, A. P., & Wren, C. R. (1998). Dynamic models of human motion. In International conference on automatic face and gesture recognition (pp. 22–27).

  32. Galata, A., Johnson, N., & Hogg, D. (2001). Learning variable length Markov models of behavior. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 81, 398–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Borges, J., & Levene, M. (2000). Data mining of user navigation patterns. In: Web usage analysis and user profiling (pp. 92–112). Heidelberg: Springer.

  34. Singer, P., Helic, D., Taraghi, B., & Strohmaier, M. (2014). Detecting memory and structure in human navigation patterns using Markov chain models of varying order. PLoS ONE, 9(7), e102070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Chierichetti, F., Kumar, R., Raghavan, P., & Sarlos, T. (2012). Are web users really Markovian? In Proceedings of WWW’12 (pp. 609–618). New York: ACM.

  36. Bishop, C. M. (2006). Pattern recognition and machine learning. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Singla, P., & Domingos, P. (2006). Entity resolution with Markov logic. In Proceedings of the sixth IEEE international conference on data mining (pp. 572–582). Hong Kong: IEEE Computer Society Press.

  38. Kok, S., Sumner, M., Richardson, M., Singla, P., Poon, H., Lowd, D., et al. (2008). The Alchemy system for statistical relational AI. Technical Report. University of Washington. http://alchemy.cs.washington.edu.

  39. Poon, H., & Domingos, P. (2006). Sound and efficient inference with probabilistic and deterministic dependencies. In Proceedings of AAAI-06. Boston: AAAI Press.

  40. Schölkopf, B., Burges, C., & Smola, A. (Eds.). (1998). Advances in kernel methods: Support vector machines. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (1984). Classification and regression trees. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Quinlan, J. R. (1986). Induction of decision trees. Machine Learning, 1(1), 81–106.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mona Gupta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gupta, M., Mittal, H., Singla, P. et al. Analysis and characterization of comparison shopping behavior in the mobile handset domain. Electron Commer Res 17, 521–551 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-016-9226-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-016-9226-7

Keywords

Navigation