Skip to main content
Log in

Linguistic group decision-making: opinion aggregation and measures of consensus

  • Published:
Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Group decision-making is a crucial activity, necessary in many aspects of our civilization. In many cases, due to inherent complexity, experts cannot express their opinion or preferences using exact numbers, thus resorting to a qualitative preference such as linguistic labels. Another complicating factor is the fact that very seldom all individuals in a group share the same opinion about the alternatives. This creates the need to aggregate all the differing individual opinions into a group opinion. Moreover, it is desirable to be able to assess the level of agreement among the experts; termed consensus. This paper presents a methodology for aggregating experts’ judgements, presented as linguistic labels, into a group opinion with a measure of the group consensus. The aggregation model allows weighted experts to express a degree of optimism or upward bias in their opinions. Then the paper presents two models of calculating the consensus based on the individual expert opinions and the group aggregated opinion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • S. M. Baas H. Kwakernaak (1977) ArticleTitleRating and ranking of multiple-aspect alternatives using fuzzy sets Automatica 13 IssueID1 47–58 Occurrence Handle0363.90010 Occurrence Handle439026 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0005-1098(77)90008-5

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • D. Ben-Arieh Z. Chen (2006) ArticleTitleOn linguistic labels aggregation and consensus measure for autocratic decision-making using group recommendations IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A 36 IssueID3 558–568 Occurrence Handle10.1109/TSMCA.2005.853488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Bezdek B. Spillman R. Spillman (1978) ArticleTitleA fuzzy relation for group decision theory Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1 255–268 Occurrence Handle0398.90009 Occurrence Handle508976 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0165-0114(78)90017-9

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • G. Bordogna M. Fedrizzi G. Pasi (1997) ArticleTitleLinguistic modeling of consensus in group decision making based on OWA operators IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A: Systems and Humans 27 IssueID1 126–133 Occurrence Handle10.1109/3468.553232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C.E. Bozdag C. Kahraman D. Ruan (2003) ArticleTitleFuzzy group decision making for selection among computer integrated manufacturing systems Computers in Industry 51 IssueID1 13–29 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0166-3615(03)00029-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S., Hwang, C.L. (1992). Fuzzy multiple attribute decision-making. Springer-Verlag

  • Cheng, C. -H. (1999). A simple fuzzy group decision making method. IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, 2, II-910–II-915.

  • Cheng, S. C., Goetzinger, A. A., Malik, D. S., & Mordeson, J. N. (2000). Consensus of group decisions applied to bone mineral density. Annual Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society – NAFIPS (pp. 206–210).

  • M. Delgado J.L. Verdegay M.A. Vila (1993) ArticleTitleOn aggregation operations of linguistic labels International Journal of Intelligent Systems 8 IssueID3 351–370 Occurrence Handle0794.68154

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • M. Delgado J.L. Verdegay M.A. Vila (1994) ArticleTitleModel for linguistic partial information in decision-making problems International Journal of intelligent Systems 9 IssueID4 365–378 Occurrence Handle0799.90001

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ephrati, E., & Rosenschein, J. S. (1994). Multi-agent planning as search for a consensus that maximizes social welfare (pp. 207–226). Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 830. Springer-Verlag.

  • Fedrizzi, M. (1990). On a consensus measure in a group MCDM problem, multiperson decision making models using fuzzy sets and possibility theory. (pp. 231–241). Dordrecht, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Fedrizzi M., Fedrizzi M., Pereira R. A. M., & Zorat A. (1995). Dynamical model for reaching consensus in group decision making. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (pp. 493–496).

  • J. Geldermann T. Spengler O. Rentz (2000) ArticleTitleFuzzy outranking for environmental assessment, Case study: Iron and steel making industry Fuzzy Sets and Systems 115 IssueID1 45–65 Occurrence Handle1073.91619 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0165-0114(99)00021-4

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • F. Herrera E. Herrera-Viedma (1997) ArticleTitleAggregation operators for linguistic weighted information IEEE Transactions on Systems Man, and Cybernetics Part A: Systems and Humans 27 IssueID5 646–656 Occurrence Handle10.1109/3468.618263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F. Herrera E. Herrera-Viedma (2000) ArticleTitleLinguistic decision analysis: Steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information Fuzzy Sets and Systems 115 67–82 Occurrence Handle1073.91528 Occurrence Handle1776304 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0165-0114(99)00024-X

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • F. Herrera E. Herrera-Viedma J.L. Verdegay (1996) ArticleTitleDirect approach processes in group decision making using linguistic OWA operators Fuzzy Sets and Systems 79 IssueID2 175–190 Occurrence Handle0870.90007 Occurrence Handle1388390 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0165-0114(95)00162-X

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • F. Herrera E. Herrera-Viedma J.L. Verdegay (1997) ArticleTitleRational consensus model in group decision making using linguistic assessments Fuzzy Sets and Systems 88 IssueID1 31–49 Occurrence Handle1376216 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0165-0114(96)00047-4

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • E. Herrera-Viedma F. Herrera F. Chiclana (2002) ArticleTitleA consensus model for multiperson decision making with different preference structures Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A, IEEE Transactions on 32 IssueID3 394–402 Occurrence Handle10.1109/TSMCA.2002.802821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H.M. Hsu C.T. Chen (1996) ArticleTitleAggregation of fuzzy opinions under group decision making Fuzzy Sets and Systems 79 279–285 Occurrence Handle1388402 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0165-0114(95)00185-9

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Iggland, B. (1991). Coupling of customer preferences and production cost information. Technology Management: The New International Language, 27–31, 250–253.

  • A. Ishikawa (1993) ArticleTitleThe new fuzzy Delphi methods: Economization of GDS (group decision support), system sciences, 1993 Proceeding of the Twenty-Sixth Hawaii International Conference on 4 255–264

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Kacprzyk M. Fedrizzi H. Nurmi (1993) Group decision making with fuzzy majorities represented by linguistic quantifiers D. Dubois H. Prade R. R. Yager (Eds) Readings in fuzzy sets for intelligent systems Morgan Kaufmann Los Altos, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kickert, W. J. M. (1978). Fuzzy theories on decision-making: A critical review. Leiden; Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Social Sciences Division; Hingham, Mass.: sole distributors for North America, Kluwer Boston.

  • H.-S. Lee (2002) ArticleTitleOptimal consensus of fuzzy opinions under group decision making environment Fuzzy Sets and Systems 132 IssueID3 303–315 Occurrence Handle1013.90073 Occurrence Handle1936869 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0165-0114(02)00056-8

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • M.U. Marimin H. Itsuo T. Hiroyuki (1998) ArticleTitleLinguistic labels for expressing fuzzy preference relations in fuzzy group decision making IEEE Transactions On Systems, Man, and Cybernetics – Part B 28 IssueID2 205–218 Occurrence Handle10.1109/3477.662760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F.J. Montero J. Tejada (1986) ArticleTitleSome problems in the definition of fuzzy preference relations Fuzzy Sets and Systems 6 249–259 Occurrence Handle852867

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ness, J., Hoffman, C. (1998). Putting sense into consensus: Solving the puzzle of making team decisions. Tacoma, Wash.: VISTA Associates.

  • K. -C. Ng B. Abramson (1992) ArticleTitleConsensus diagnosis: a simulation study Systems, Man and Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions on 2 IssueID5 916–928 Occurrence Handle10.1109/21.179832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. Nurmi (1981) ArticleTitleApproaches to collective decision-making with fuzzy preference relations Fuzzy Sets and Systems 6 249–259 Occurrence Handle0465.90006 Occurrence Handle635346 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0165-0114(81)90003-8

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • P. Prodanovic S.P. Simonovic (2003) ArticleTitleFuzzy compromise programming for Group decision making Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A, IEEE Transactions on 33 IssueID3 358–365 Occurrence Handle10.1109/TSMCA.2003.817050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Shamsuzzaman A.M.M. Sharif Ullah L.J. Bohez Erik (2003) ArticleTitleApplying linguistic criteria in FMS selection: fuzzy-set-AHP approach Integrated Manufacturing Systems 14 IssueID3 247–254 Occurrence Handle10.1108/09576060310463190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Spillman R. Spillman J. Bezdek (1980) A fuzzy analysis of consensus in small groups P. P. Wang S. K. Chang (Eds) Fuzzy Sets Theory and Applications to Policy, Analysis and Information Systems New York Plenum 291–308

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Tanino (1984) ArticleTitleFuzzy preference orderings in group decision making Fuzzy Sets and Systems 12 117–131 Occurrence Handle0567.90002 Occurrence Handle734944 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0165-0114(84)90032-0

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tanino, T. (1988). Fuzzy preference relations in group decision making. In J. Kacprzyk, & M. Roubens (Eds.), non-connected preference relations in decision making, (pp. 54–71). Springer-Verlag.

  • R.-C Wang S.-J. Chuu (2002) ArticleTitleGroup decision making using a fuzzy linguistic approach for evaluating the flexibility in a manufacturing system European Journal of Operational Research 154 563–572 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00729-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.R. Yager (1988) ArticleTitleOn ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making IEEE Transactions System, Man, Cybernetics A 18 183–190 Occurrence Handle0637.90057 Occurrence Handle931863 Occurrence Handle10.1109/21.87068

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • R.R. Yager (1993) ArticleTitleFamilies of OWA operators Fuzzy Sets and Systems 59 IssueID2 125–148 Occurrence Handle0790.94004 Occurrence Handle1253838 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0165-0114(93)90194-M

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • R.R. Yager (1993) ArticleTitleNon-numeric multi-criteria multi-person decision making Group Decision and Negotiation 2 81–93 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01384404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.R. Yager (2003) ArticleTitleInduced aggregation operators Fuzzy Sets and Systems 137 59–69 Occurrence Handle1056.68146 Occurrence Handle1992698 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0165-0114(02)00432-3

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • L.A. Zadeh (1975) Fuzzy sets and their applications to cognitive and decision processes Academic Press New York Occurrence Handle0307.00008

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Ben-Arieh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ben-Arieh, D., Chen, Z. Linguistic group decision-making: opinion aggregation and measures of consensus. Fuzzy Optim Decis Making 5, 371–386 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-006-0017-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-006-0017-9

Keywords

Navigation