Abstract
This paper describes instances of multicommunicating—or engaging in more than one conversation at a time. It uses a critical incident technique to explore successful and unsuccessful incidents of multicommunicating from the perspective of 201 MBA students. Additionally, we asked which media individuals pair together when multicommunicating. We found very frequent pairing of the telephone (which provides partial compartmentalization but no flexibility of tempo) with electroric text (which provides both compartmentalization and flexibility of tempo). We also found that respondents provide a variety of reasons for labeling a particular episode as “unsuccessful.” In many cases the person seemed to describe an episode as unsuccessful when the person or a communicating partner had exceeded his or her ability to juggle multiple conversations as demonstrated by communication errors.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brown, S. (2008). Household technology adoption, use, and impacts: past, present, and future. Information Systems Frontiers, 10(4), 397–403.
Burleson, B. R., & Planalp, S. (2000). Producing emotion(al) messages. Communication Theory, 10, 221–250.
Cameron, A. F., & Webster, J. (2005). Unintended consequences of emerging communication technologies: instant messaging in the workplace. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 85–103.
Carlson, J., & Zmud, R. (1999). Channel expansion theory and the experiential nature of media richness perceptions. Academy of Management Journal, 42(2), 153–170.
Daft, R., & Lengel, R. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571.
Dennis, A., & Kinney, S. (1998). Testing media richness theory in the new media: the effects of cues, feedback, and task equivocality. Information Systems Research, 9(3), 256–274.
Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 327–358.
Fulk, J. (1993). Social construction of communication technology. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 921–950.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor.
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual. New York: Anchor.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: As essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper & Row.
Griffiths, M., & Light, B. (2008). Social networking and digital gaming media convergence: classification and the consequences for appropriation. Information Systems Frontiers, 10(4), 447–459.
Haerem, T., & Rau, D. (2007). The influence of degree of expertise and objective task complexity on perceived task complexity and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1320–1331.
Herring, S. C. (ed). (2003). Computer-mediated discourse. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Hill, T., & Roldan, M. (2005). Toward third generation threaded discussions for mobile learning: opportunities and challenges for ubiquitous collaborative environments. Information Systems Frontiers, 7(1), 55–70.
Kishore, R., & McLean, E. (2002). The next generation enterprise: a CIO perspective on the vision, its impacts, and implementation challenges. Information Systems Frontiers, 4(1), 121.
Madden, M., & Jones, S. (2008). Networked workers. Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project.
Meyrowitz, J. (1985). No sense of place. New York: Oxford.
Orlikowski, W. (1992). The duality of technology: rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398–427.
Reinsch, L. N., Jr., Turner, J. W., & Tinsley, C. (2008). Multicommunicating: a practice whose time has come? Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 391–403.
Rice, R. (1992). Task analyzability, use of new media, and effectiveness: a multi-site exploration of media richness. Organization Science, 3(4), 475–500.
Rice, R., & Gattiker, U. (2001). New media and organizational structuring. In F. Jablin & L. Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods, pp. 544–581. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Scott, W. A. (1953). Reliability of content analysis: the case of nominal scale coding. Public Opinion Quarterly, 19, 321–325.
Trevino, L., Webster, J., & Stein, E. (2000). Making connections: complementary influences on communication media choice, attitudes, and use. Organization Science, 11(2), 163–182.
Turner, J. W., & Reinsch, L. N., Jr. (2004). Except when it’s my boss: Predictors of intent to communicate polychronically. Paper presented at the The Academy of Management, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Turner, J. W., & Reinsch, L. N., Jr. (2007). The business communicator as presence allocator: multicommunicating, equivocality, and status at work. Journal of Business Communication, 44(1), 36–58.
Turner, J. W., & Tinsley, C. (2002). Polychronic Communication: Managing Multiple Conversations at Once. Paper presented at the Academy of Management, Denver, Colorado.
Turner, J. W., Grube, J., Tinsley, C., Lee, C., & Opell, C. (2006). Exploring the dominant media: does media use reflect organizational norms and impact performance. Journal of Business Communication, 43(3), 1–31.
Venkatesh, A. (2008). Digital home technologies and transformation of households. Information Systems Frontiers, 10(4), 391–395.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Turner, J.W., Reinsch, N.L. Successful and unsuccessful multicommunication episodes: Engaging in dialogue or juggling messages?. Inf Syst Front 12, 277–285 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-009-9175-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-009-9175-y