Skip to main content
Log in

Leveraging temporal and spatial separations with the 24-hour knowledge factory paradigm

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The 24-H Knowledge Factory facilitates collaboration between geographically and temporally distributed teams. The teams themselves form a strategic partnership whose joint efforts contribute to the completion of a project. Project-related tasks are likewise distributed, allowing tasks to be completed on a continuous basis, regardless of the constraints of any one team’s working hours. However, distributing a single task between multiple teams necessitates a handoff process, where one team’s development efforts and task planning are communicated from one team ending their shift to the next that will continue the effort. Data management is, therefore, critical to the success of this business model. Efficiency in data management is achieved through a strategic leveraging of key tools, models, and concepts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahituv, N., Igbaria, M., & Sella, A. (1998). “The effects of time pressure and completeness of information on decision making”. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(2), 153–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battin, R., Crocker, D., Kreidler, J. & Subramanian, K. (2001) “Leveraging Resources in Global Software Development”, IEEE Software, Vol. 18, Issue 2

  • Beck, K. (2000) “Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change”, Addison Wesley

  • Berger, S. (2006). How we compete: What companies around the world are doing to make it in today's global economy. New York and London: Currency Doubleday.

  • Birkinshaw, J., & Sheehan, T. (2002). Managing the knowledge life cycle. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(1), 75–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks Jr, F. P. (1995) “The Mythical Man-Month”, Addison-Wesley

  • Carmel, E. & Agarwal, R. (2002) “The Maturation of Offshore Sourcing of Information Technology Work”, MIS Quarterly Executive, Volume 1, Issue 2

  • Crk, I., Sorensen, D., & Mitra, A. (2008). “Leveraging Knowledge Reuse and System Agility in the Outsourcing Era”. Journal of Information Technology Research, 1(2), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekleva, S. (1992). Delphi study of software maintenance problems. Conference on Software Maintenance Proceedings, 9(12), 10–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denny, N., Crk, I., & Seshu, R. (2008a). “Agile Software Processes for the 24-Hour Knowledge Factory Environment”. Journal of Information Technology Research, 1(1), 57–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denny, N., Mani, S., Seshu, R., Swaminathan, M., & Samdal, J. (2008b). “Hybrid Offshoring: Composite Personae and Evolving Collaboration Technologies”. Journal of Information Technology Review, 21(1), 89–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, E. & Gelernter, D. (1996) “Lifestreams: A Storage Model for Personal Data”, ACM SIGMOD Record

  • Gao, J. Z., Chen, C., Toyoshimo, Y., & Leung, D. K. (1999). “Engineering on the Internet for Global Software Production”. IEEE Computer, 32(5), 38–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. (2001) “A Four-Faceted Knowledge Based Approach to Surmounting National and Other Borders.” The Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 5, No. 4, 2001

  • Gupta, A. & Seshasai, S. (2007) “24-Hour Knowledge Factory: Using Internet Technology to Leverage Spatial and Temporal Separations”, ACM Transactions on Internet Technology, Vol. 7, No. 3, Article 14

  • Knuth, D. (1984). “Literate Programming”. The Computer Journal, 27(2), 97–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myopolous, J. (1998). “Information Modeling in the Time of Revolution”. Information Systems, 23(3), 127–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1994). “A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation”. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, K., Subramanian, S., & Denny, N. (2008). “Voice-Based Approach for Surmounting Spatial and Temporal Separations”. Journal of Information Technology Research, 1(2), 54–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. B. (1999). “Strategic Outsourcing: Leveraging Knowledge Capabilities”. Sloan Management Review, 40(4), 9–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quintas, J. B., Anderson, P., & Finkelstein, S. (1996). ``Managing professional intellect: making the most of the best''. Harvard Business Review, 74, 71–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwhaj, A., & Grover, V. (2003). “Shaping Agility through Digital Options: Reconceptualizing the Role of Information Technology in Contemporary Firms,”. MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 237–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarbrough, H. (1998). “BPR and the knowledge-based view of the firm”. Knowledge and Process Management, 5(3), 192–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J.R. (1975) “A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts. Language, Mind and Knowledge”, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, pgs 344-369

  • Seshasai, S. & Gupta, A. (2007) "Harbinger of the 24-Hour Knowledge Factory" Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1020423

  • Schwaber, K., & Beedle, M. (2002). Agile Software Development with Scrum. Series in Agile Software Development, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spender, J. C. (1996). “Organizational knowledge learning and memory: three concepts in search of a theory”. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 9(1), 63–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchan, J. & Hayzak, G. (2001) “The communication characteristics of virtual teams: a case study”, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, Vol. 44, No. 3

  • Todd, P., & Benbasat, I. (1991). “An experimental investigation of the impact of computer-based decision aids on decision making strategies”. Information Systems Research, 2(2), 87–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vessey, I., & Sravanapudi, A. P. (1995). “Case Tools as Collaborative Support Technologies”. Communications of the ACM, 38(1), 83–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, H. L. (1995). “Information/knowledge acquisition methods for decision support systems and expert systems”. Information Processing and Management, 31(1), 47–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, E. J. (1997) “World Wide Web Distributed Authoring and Versioning (WebDAV): An Introduction”, StandardView 5, pgs 1, 3–8

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the following current and former members of the 24-Hour Knowledge Factory Research Group at the University of Arizona for their research ideas: Nathan Denny, Kate O’Toole, Shivaram Mani, Ravi Seshu, Manish Swaminathan, and Jamie Samdal

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amar Gupta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gupta, A., Crk, I. & Bondade, R. Leveraging temporal and spatial separations with the 24-hour knowledge factory paradigm. Inf Syst Front 13, 397–405 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-009-9226-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-009-9226-4

Keywords

Navigation