Abstract
Although a few studies have focused on mobile value from the distinctive feature of a mobile technology perspective, limited attempts have been made from a mobile user’s value tendency perspective. In this study, building upon prior research on productivity-oriented and pleasure-oriented nature of systems, we categorize mobile values as having utilitarian and hedonic use. Based on these two values, we conceptualize types of tendency of mobile users’ application use namely utilitarian tendency and hedonic tendency. The goal of this study is to examine the relationships between mobile consumers’ value tendency and their perceptions of mobile Internet service quality in terms of three different mobile quality dimensions (i.e., connection quality, design quality, and information quality). In addition, drawing upon the “digital divide” literature, the relationships between mobile users’ personal dispositions (i.e., maturity and socio-economic status) and their mobile value tendency are also tested. The empirical results of the study, the interpretation of the results, research contributions, and limitations are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Even though mobile Internet service and wireless Internet service are used interchangeably in many cases, they are different. Wireless Internet service can be defined to a Radio Frequency (RF)-based Internet service. Some of wireless Internet services such as Wi-Fi, Local Multipoint Distribution Service (LMDS), Multi-point Multi-channel Distribution Service (MMDS), and fixed wireless LAN, have limited or low mobility—i.e., they are mobile stationary services within a restricted area (e.g., a building). In this study, mobile Internet service is defined as the narrow wireless Internet service provides high mobility in a wide area (e.g., a city-wide) through portable mobile devices such as a cell phone, a PDA, and a handheld computer. The mobile Internet service provides connectivity to the Internet while moving (i.e., mobile connectivity), whereas fixed types of wireless Internet service have a limited mobile connectivity.
Please note that in this study we are not proposing any theories that address the causal relationship between mobile value tendency and users’ perceptions on service quality. In this study, what we are proposing is the association between mobile value tendency and perceptions on service quality.
The fourteen choices were available mobile applications at that time the survey was conducted.
Common method bias refers to error that is attributable to the measurement method rather than to the construct of interest. It is one of the main sources of measurement error which threatens the validity of the conclusions about the relationships between measures.
References
Anckar, B., & D’Incau, D. (2002). Value creation in mobile commerce: findings from a consumer survey. The Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application (JITTA), 4(1), 43–64.
Atkin, C. (1973). Instrumental utilities and information seeking. In P. Clarke (Ed.), New models for mass communication research (pp. 205–242). London: Sage.
Baldi, S., & Thaung, H. (2002). The entertaining way to M-Commerce: Japan's approach to the mobile internet—A model for Europe? Electronic Markets 12(1).
Barzilai-Nahon, K. (2006). Gaps and bits: conceptualizing measurements for digital divide/s. Information Society, 22, 269–278.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246.
Bentler, P. M., & Chou, C. P. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods & Research, 16(1), 78–117.
Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1997). Listening to the customer—the concept of a service-quality information system. Sloan Management Review, 38, 65–76.
Bikson, T., & Panis, C. (1999). Citizens, computers, and connectivity. Santa Monica: RAND.
Boneva, B., Kraut, R., & Frohlich, D. (2001). Using e-mail for personal relationships: the difference gender makes. The American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 530–549.
Booz-Allen&Hamilton (2000). The wireless internet revolution. In Insights: Communications, Media & Technology Group.
Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Carpenter, J. M., Moore, M., & Fairhurst, A. E. (2005). Consumer shopping value for retail brands. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 9(1), 43–53.
Chen, W., Boase, J., & Wellman, B. (2002). The global villagers: Comparing internet users and uses around the world. In B. Wellman & C. Haythomthwaite (Eds.), The internet in everyday life (pp. 74–113). Blackwell.
Cheong, J. H., & Park, M.-C. (2005). Mobile internet acceptance in Korea. Internet Research, 15(2), 125–140.
Chin, W. W. (1998). Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), 7–16.
Ching, C. C., Basham, J. D., & Jang, E. (2005). The legacy of the digital divide: gender, socioeconomic status, and early exposure as predictors of full-spectrum techonology use among young adults. Urban Education, 40(4), 394–411.
Chinn, M. D., & Fairlie, R. W. (2004). The determinants of the global digital divide: A cross-country analysis of computer and internet penetration. In Department of Economics. University of Wisconsin.
Chiu, C.-M., Chiu, C.-S., & Chang, A.-C. (2007). Examining the integrated influence of fairness and quality on learners’ satisfaction and web-based learning continuance intention. Information Systems Journal, 17, 271–287.
Cho, J., ZuniGa, H. G. D., Rojas, H., & Shah, D. V. (2003). Beyong access: the digital divide and internet uses and gratifications. IT & Society, 1(4), 46–72.
Churchill, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64–73.
Clarke, I. (2001). Emerging value propositions for M-Commerce. Journal of Business Strategies, 18(2), 133–148.
Collier, J. E., & Bienstock, C. C. (2006). Measuring service quality in E-Retailing. Journal of Service Research, 8(3), 260–275.
Cronin, J. J., Brady, M. K., Brand, R. R., Hightower, R. J., & Shemwell, D. J. (1997). A cross-sectional test of the effect and conceptualization of service value. The Journal of Services Marketing, 11(6), 375.
Cronin, J. J. J., Brady, M. K., & Hult, G. T. M. (2000). Assessing the effects of quality, value, and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioural intentions in service environments. Journal of Retailing, 76(2), 193–218.
Dabolkar, P. A., Shepard, D. D., & Thorpe, D. I. (2000). A comprehensive framework for service quality: an investigation of critical conceptual and measurement issues through a longitudinal study. Journal of Retailing, 76(2), 139–173.
Dyer, J. H. (1997). Effective interfirm collaboration: how firms minimize transaction cost and maximize transaction value. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 535–556.
Dyke, V. P. T., Kappelman, L. A., & Prybutok, V. R. (1997). Measuring information systems service quality: concerns on the use of the SERVQUAL questionnaire. MIS Quarterly, 21(2), 195–208.
Dyke, V. P. T., Prybutok, V. R., & Kappelman, L. A. (1999). Cautions on the use of the SERVQUAL measure to assess the quality of information systems services. Decision Sciences, 30(3), 877–890.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
Grewal, D., Monroe, K. B., & Krishnan, R. (1998). The effect of price-comparison advertising on buyers’ perceptions of acquisition value, transaction value, and behavioral intentions. Journal of Marketing, 62(2), 46–59.
Gronroos, C. (1984). A service quality model and its marketing implications. European Journal of Marketing, 18(4), 36–44.
Heinonen, K., & Strandvik, T. (2005). Communication as an element of service value. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 16(2), 186.
Hirschman, E. C., & Holbrook, M. B. (1982). Hedonic consumption: emerging concepts, methods and propositions. Journal of Marketing, 46(3), 92–101.
Holbrook, M. B. (1999). Introduction to consumer value. In M. B. Holbrook (Ed.), Consumer value: A framework for analysis and research. New York: Routledge.
Holsapple, C. W. (2007). User acceptance of virtual worlds: the hedonic framework. Database for Advances in Information Systems, 38(4), 86–89.
Hong, S.-J., Thong, J. Y. L., & Tam, K. Y. (2006). Understanding continued information technology usage behavior: a comparison of three models in the context of mobile internet. Decision Support Systems, 42, 1819–1834.
Howard, P., Rainie, L., & Jones, S. (2001). Days and nights on the internet: the impact of a diffusing technolgoy. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 383–404.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.
ITU-T (1994). Terms and definitions related to quality of service and network performance including dependability. Recommendation (E.800).
Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1988). LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications. Chicago: SPSS Inc.
Kannan, P., Chang, A., & Whinston, A. (2001). Wireless commerce: marketing issues and possibilities, The 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-34). Maui: IEEE Computer Society Press.
Katz, E., Blumler, G., & Gurevich, M. (1974). Utilization of mass communication by the individual. In J. G. Blumler & E. Katz (Eds.), The use of mass communication: Current perspectives on gratifications research (pp. 19–32). Beverly Hills: Sage.
Katz, J. E., & Rice, R. E. (2002). Social consequences of internet use: access, involvement and interaction. Cambridge: MIT.
Kelloway, E. K. (1998). Using LISREL for structural equation modeling: A researcher’s guide. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Kim, H.-W., Chan, H. C., & Gupta, S. (2007). Value-based adoption of mobile internet: an empirical investigation. Decision Support Systems, 43(1), 111–126.
Kim, H., Kim, J., & Lee, Y. (2005). An empirical study of use contexts in the mobile internet, focusing on the usability of information architecture. Information Systems Frontiers, 7(2), 175–186.
King, W. R., & Epstein, B. J. (1983). Assessing information system value: an experimental study. Decision Sciences, 14(1), 34.
Kline, R. G. (1998). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.
Koivisto, M., & Urbaczewski, A. (2004). The relationship between quality of service perceived and delivered in mobile Internet communications. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 2, 309–323.
Kraut, R., Mukhopadhyay, T., Szczypula, J., Kiesler, S., & Scherlis, B. (1999). Information and communication: alternative uses of the Internet in households. Information Systems Research, 10(4), 287–303.
Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. P. (2005). Essentials of business information systems: managing the digital firm. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Leung, L., & Wei, R. (1998). The gratifications of pager use: sociability, information-seeking, entertainment, utility, and fashion and Status. Telematics and Informatics, 15, 253–264.
Leung, L., & Wei, R. (2000). More than just talk on the move: uses and gratifications of the cellular phone. J&MC Quarterly, 77, 308–320.
Mookerjee, V. S., & Dos Santos, B. L. (1993). Inductive expert system design: maximizing system value. Information Systems Research, 4(2), 111.
Mundorf, N., & Bryant, J. (2002). Realizing the social and commercial potential of interactive technologies. Journal of Business Research, 55, 665–670.
Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing Management, 49, 41–50.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring customer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.
Pienaar, A., Kruger, P. S., & Adendorff, K. (1986). An evaluation model for quantifying system value. IIE Transactions, 18(1), 10.
Pitt, L. F., Watson, R. T., & Kavan, C. B. (1995). Service quality: a measure of information systems effectiveness. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 173–187.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
Rao, H. R., & Lynch, B. D. (1993). Hedonic price analysis of workstation attributes. Communication of ACM, 36(12), 95–102.
Rice, R. E., & Katz, H. E. (2003). Comparing internet and mobile phone usage: digital divides of usage, adoption, and dropouts. Telecommunications Policy, 27, 597–623.
Rosengren, E. (1974). Uses and gratifications: a paradigm outlined. In J. G. Blumler & E. Katz (Eds.), The use of mass communication: Current perspectives on gratifications research (pp. 269–286). Beverly Hills: Sage.
Sadeh, N. (2002). M-Commerce: Technologies, services, and business models. Boston: Wiley.
Sheehan, K. B. (2002). Of surfing, searching, and newshounds: a typology of Internet users’ online sessions. Journal of Advertising Research, 42(5), 62–71.
Siau, K., Lim, E., & Shen, Z. (2001). Mobil commerce: promises, challenges, and research agenda. Journal of Database Management, 12(3), 4–13.
Siau, S., & Shen, Z. (2003). Building customer trust in mobile commerce. Communication of ACM, 46(4), 91–94.
Van Der Heijden, H. (2004). User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly, 28(4), 695–704.
Wakefield, R. L., & Whitten, D. (2006). Mobile computing: a user study on hedonic/utilitarian mobile device usage. European Journal of Information Systems, 15, 292–300.
Wood, S., & Chatterjee, S. (2002). Network quality of service for the enterprise: a broad overview. Information Systems Frontiers, 4(1), 63–84.
Woodruff, R. B. (1997). Customer value: the next source for competitive edge. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 25(2), 139–153.
Young, L. F. (1984). Justifying information systems: value acquisition versus cost reduction. The Journal of Information Systems Management, 1(3), 93.
Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A., & Malhotra, A. (2000). A conceptual framework for understanding E-service quality: Implications for future research and managerial practice, Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA.
Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A., & Malhotra, A. (2002). Service quality delivery through web sites: a critical review of extant knowledge. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 30(4), 362–375.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, D.J., Hwang, Y. A study of mobile internet user’s service quality perceptions from a user’s utilitarian and hedonic value tendency perspectives. Inf Syst Front 14, 409–421 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-010-9267-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-010-9267-8