Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A conceptual framework for quality healthcare accessibility: a scalable approach for big data technologies

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Commentary to this article was published on 08 February 2018

Abstract

Healthcare accessibility research has been of growing interest for scholars and practitioners. This manuscript classifies prior studies on the Floating Catchment Area methodologies, a prevalent class of methodologies that measure healthcare accessibility, and presents a framework that conceptualizes accessibility computation. We build the Floating Catchment Method General Framework as an IT artifact, following best practices in Design Science Research. We evaluate the utility of our framework by creating an instantiation, as an algorithm, and test it with large healthcare data sets from California. We showcase the practical application of the artifact and address the pressing issue of access to quality healthcare. This example also serves as a prototype for Big Data Analytics, as it presents opportunities to scale the analysis vertically and horizontally. In order for researchers to perform high impact studies and make the world a better place, an overarching framework utilizing Big Data Analytics should be seriously considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www.healthit.gov/providers-professionals/how-attain-meaningful-use, accessed on August 18, 2016

  2. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/06000.html, accessed on August 18, 2016

  3. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/06000.html, accessed on August 18, 2016

  4. http://www.oshpd.ca.gov/, accessed on August 18, 2016

  5. https://www.walkscore.com/, accessed on August 18, 2016

  6. http://www.sunnumber.com/, accessed on August 18, 2016

  7. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/06000.html, accessed on August 18, 2016

References

  • Aday, L. A., & Andersen, R. (1974). A framework for the study of access to medical care. Health Services Research, 9(3), 208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, M. A., Humblet, O., Hiatt, R. A., & Adler, N. E. (2013). Big data and disease prevention: from quantified self to quantified communities. Big Data, 1(3), 168–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canlas, R. (2009). Data mining in healthcare: Current applications and issues. School of Information Systems & Management: Carnegie Mellon University, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Agostino, R. (1971). An omnibus test of normality for moderate and large size samples. Biometrika, 58(2), 341–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • d’Agostino, R., & Pearson, E. S. (1973). Tests for departure from normality. Empirical results for the distributions of b2 and√b1. Biometrika, 60(3), 613–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delamater, P. L. (2013). Spatial accessibility in suboptimally configured health care systems: a modified two-step floating catchment area (M2SFCA) metric. Health & Place, 24, 30–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dony, C. C., Delmelle, E. M., & Delmelle, E. C. (2015). Re-conceptualizing accessibility to parks in multi-modal cities: a variable-width floating catchment area (VFCA) method. Landscape and Urban Planning, 143, 90–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESRI (2016a). OD cost matrix analysis. http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/extensions/network-analyst/od-cost-matrix.htm. Accessed 18 Aug 2016.

  • ESRI (2016b). Optimized hot spot analysis. http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/10.3/tools/spatial-statistics-toolbox/optimized-hot-spot-analysis.htm. Accessed 20 Aug 2016.

  • Fransen, K., Neutens, T., De Maeyer, P., & Deruyter, G. (2015). A commuter-based two-step floating catchment area method for measuring spatial accessibility of daycare centers. Health & Place, 32, 65–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, M., & Shelton, T. (2013). Geography and the future of big data, big data and the future of geography. Dialogues in Human Geography, 3(3), 255–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groves, P., Kayyali, B., Knott, D., & Van Kuiken, S. (2013). The ‘big data’ revolution in healthcare. http://www.mckinsey.com/industries/healthcare-systems-and-services/our-insights/the-big-data-revolution-in-us-health-care. Accessed 16 Nov 2016.

  • Guagliardo, M. F. (2004). Spatial accessibility of primary care: concepts, methods and challenges. International Journal of Health Geographics, 3(1), 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hevner, A., & Chatterjee, S. (2010). Design research in information systems: theory and practice (Vol. 22): Springer.

  • Hevner, A., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgs, G. (2004). A literature review of the use of GIS-based measures of access to health care services. Health Services & Outcomes Research Methodology, 5(2), 119–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jee, K., & Kim, G.-H. (2013). Potentiality of big data in the medical sector: focus on how to reshape the healthcare system. Healthcare informatics research, 19(2), 79–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, A. A. (1992). An integrated approach to measuring potential spatial access to health care services. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 26(4), 275–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langford, M., Higgs, G., & Fry, R. (2016). Multi-modal two-step floating catchment area analysis of primary health care accessibility. Health & Place, 38, 70–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, J. (2014). Integrating the huff model and floating catchment area methods to analyze spatial access to healthcare services. Transactions in GIS, 18(3), 436–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, W., & Qi, Y. (2009). An enhanced two-step floating catchment area (E2SFCA) method for measuring spatial accessibility to primary care physicians. Health & Place, 15(4), 1100–1107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, W., & Wang, F. (2003). Measures of spatial accessibility to health care in a GIS environment: synthesis and a case study in the Chicago region. Environment and Planning. B, Planning & Design, 30, 865–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, W., & Whippo, T. (2012). Variable catchment sizes for the two-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) method. Health & Place, 18(4), 789–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mao, L., & Nekorchuk, D. (2013). Measuring spatial accessibility to healthcare for populations with multiple transportation modes. Health & Place, 24, 115–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrail, M. R., & Humphreys, J. S. (2014). Measuring spatial accessibility to primary health care services: Utilising dynamic catchment sizes. Applied Geography, 54, 182–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, T. B., & Detsky, A. S. (2013). The inevitable application of big data to health care. JAMA, 309(13), 1351–1352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musa, G. J., Chiang, P.-H., Sylk, T., Bavley, R., Keating, W., Lakew, B., et al. (2013). Use of GIS mapping as a public health tool—from cholera to cancer. Health Services Insights, 6, 111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngui, A. N., & Apparicio, P. (2011). Optimizing the two-step floating catchment area method for measuring spatial accessibility to medical clinics in Montreal. BMC Health Services Research, 11(1), 166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polzin, P., Borges, J., & Coelho, A. (2014). An extended kernel density two-step floating catchment area method to analyze access to health care. Environment and Planning. B, Planning & Design, 41(4), 717–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radke, J., & Mu, L. (2000). Spatial decompositions, modeling and mapping service regions to predict access to social programs. Geographic Information Sciences, 6(2), 105–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raghupathi, W., & Raghupathi, V. (2014). Big data analytics in healthcare: promise and potential. Health Information Science and Systems, 2(1), 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, M., & Clegg, J. (2005). Improved determination of Q-factor and resonant frequency by a quadratic curve-fitting method. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 47(2), 399–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, N., & Pathak, J. (2014). Why health care may finally Be ready for big data. Harvard Business Review.

  • Siegel, M., Koller, D., Vogt, V., & Sundmacher, L. (2016). Developing a composite index of spatial accessibility across different health care sectors: a German example. Health Policy, 120(2), 205–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soliman, S., Christensen, G., & Rouhi, A. (1988). A new technique for curve fitting based on minimum absolute deviations. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 6(4), 341–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vo, A., Plachkinova, M., & Bhaskar, R. (2015). Assessing healthcare accessibility algorithms: A comprehensive investigation of two-step floating catchment methodologies family.

  • Wan, N., Zou, B., & Sternberg, T. (2012). A three-step floating catchment area method for analyzing spatial access to health services. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 26(6), 1073–1089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, F., & Luo, W. (2005). Assessing spatial and nonspatial factors for healthcare access: towards an integrated approach to defining health professional shortage areas. Health & Place, 11(2), 131–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miloslava Plachkinova.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Plachkinova, M., Vo, A., Bhaskar, R. et al. A conceptual framework for quality healthcare accessibility: a scalable approach for big data technologies. Inf Syst Front 20, 289–302 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9726-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9726-y

Keywords

Navigation