Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Smart Institutional Intervention in the Adoption of Digital Infrastructure: The Case of Government Cloud Computing in Oman

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cloud computing technology presents a case of centralised digital infrastructure that requires adherence to standards and planned approach for its adoption and implementation. There is little knowledge on how institutions could influence the successful migration to the cloud considering the known challenges of adopting technology infrastructure. This research questions: How can institutions positively influence the adoption of cloud computing services? It examines the case of adopting government cloud computing in Sultanate of Oman. It adopts concepts from institutional theory as a theoretical lens to synthesis and explains empirical results. The study shows the practices that exerted institutional forces and the role they play in the successful adoption and migration to cloud services. It reveals that not all institutional forces carry equal weight in their influence, and this depends on the context of adoption. In the case study, we found that both coercive and mimetic forces to be playing prominent roles in pushing the adoption and migration to the cloud forward easing potential resistance from normative forces. We conceptualise this as a smart intervention that took the context of adoption seriously into consideration and was tailored accordingly. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For a list of ODA recipients see: https://www.oecd.org/dac/financing-sustainable-development/development-finance-standards/DAC_List_ODA_Recipients2018to2020_flows_En.pdf

References

  • Adler-Milstein, J., McAfee, A. P., Bates, D. W., & Jha, A. K. (2008). The state of regional health information organizations: current activities and financing. Health Affairs, 27(1), 60–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ang, S., & Cummings, L. L. (1997). Strategic response to institutional influences on information systems outsourcing. Organization Science, 8(3), 235–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armbrust, M., Fox, A., Griffith, R., Joseph, A. D., Katz, R., Konwinski, A., Lee, G., Patterson, D., Rabkin, A., & Stoica, I. (2010). A view of cloud computing. Communications of the ACM, 53(4), 50–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avgerou, C. (2000). IT and organizational change: an institutionalist perspective. Information Technology & People, 13(4), 234–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baptista, J., Newell, S., & Currie, W. (2010). Paradoxical effects of institutionalisation on the strategic awareness of technology in organisations. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 19(3), 171–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benders, J., Batenburg, R., & Van der Blonk, H. (2006). Sticking to standards; technical and other isomorphic pressures in deploying ERP-systems. Information & Management, 43(2), 194–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, J.M. (2013). Adoption of cloud computing by SMEs in India: a study of the institutional factors, Proceedings of the Nineteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems.

  • Braa, J., Hanseth, O., Heywood, A., Mohammed, W., & Shaw, V. (2007). Developing health information systems in developing countries: the flexible standards strategy. MIS Quarterly, 31(2), 381–402.

  • Brown, D. H., & Thompson, S. (2011). Priorities, policies and practice of e-government in a developing country context: ICT infrastructure and diffusion in Jamaica. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(3), 329–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buyya, R., Broberg, J., & Goscinski, A. M. (2010). Cloud Computing: Principles and Paradigms. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, V., & Ramachandran, M. (2016). Towards achieving data security with the cloud computing adoption framework. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 9(1), 138–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiasson, M. W., & Davidson, E. (2005). Taking industry seriously in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 591–605.

  • Ciborra, C. U., & Hanseth, O. (1998). From tool to to Gestell: Agendas for managing the information infrastructure. Information Technology & People, 11(4), 305–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantinides, P., & Barrett, M. (2014). Information infrastructure development and governance as collective action. Information Systems Research, 26(1), 40–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creeger, M. (2009). Cloud computing: an overview. ACM Queue, 7(5), 626–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative and mixed methods approaches. London and Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, W. (2009). Contextualising the IT artefact: towards a wider research agenda for IS using institutional theory. Information Technology & People, 22(1), 63–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, W. L. (2012). Institutional isomorphism and change: the national programme for IT–10 years on. Journal of Information Technology, 27(3), 236–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, W. L., & Guah, M. W. (2007). Conflicting institutional logics: a national programme for IT in the organisational field of healthcare. Journal of Information Technology, 22(3), 235–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, W.L., and Swanson, E.B. (2009). Special issue on institutional theory in information systems research: Contextualizing the IT artefact. Journal of Information Technology, 24(4), 283–285. Springer.

  • Davidson, E. J., & Chismar, W. G. (2007). The interaction of institutionally triggered and technology-triggered social structure change: an investigation of computerized physician order entry. MIS Quarterly, 31(4), 739–758.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vaujany, F. X., Fomin, V. V., Haefliger, S., & Lyytinen, K. (2018). Rules, Practices, and Information Technology: A Trifecta of Organizational Regulation. Information Systems Research, 29(3), 755–773.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 147–160.

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: Chicago University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkee, D. (2010a). Why cloud computing will never be free. Communications of the ACM, 53(5), 62–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkee, D. (2010b). Why cloud computing will never be free, in ACM Queue, pp. 01–10.

  • Easterby-Smith, M., Lyles, M., & Tsang, E. (2008b). Inter-organisational knowledge transfer: Current themes and future prospects. Journal of Management Studies, 45(4), 677–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagin, A. J. (2000). Social pressures on organizational website adoption. Human Communication Research, 26(4), 618–646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flick, U. (2008). Designing qualitative research. Massachusett: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fossey, E., Harvey, C., McDermott, F., et al. (2002). Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 36, 717–732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gangwar, H., Date, H., & Ramaswamy, R. (2015). Understanding determinants of cloud computing adoption using an integrated TAM-TOE model. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(1), 107–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • GCC (2015). Foundations and Objectives of GCC.

  • Goode, S., Lin, C., Tsai, J. C., & Jiang, J. J. (2015). Rethinking the role of security in client satisfaction with Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) providers. Decision Support Systems, 70, 73–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosain, S. (2004). Enterprise information systems as objects and carriers of institutional forces: the new iron cage? Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 5(4), 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gozman, D., & Currie, W. (2014). The role of investment management systems in regulatory compliance: a post-financial crisis study of displacement mechanisms. Journal of Information Technology, 29(1), 44–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gratner 2014. Predicts (2014): Cloud Computing Affects All Aspects of IT.

  • Gregor, S. (2006). The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 30(3), 611–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, D., & Miozzo, M. (2006). Institutional effects on the IT outsourcing market: Analysing clients, suppliers and staff transfer in Germany and the UK. Organization Studies, 27(9), 1229–1259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Güner, E. O., & Sneiders, E. (2014). Cloud computing adoption factors in Turkish large scale enterprises. In Proceedings of Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS) 2014 (pp. 353–361).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanseth, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010). Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: the case of building internet. Journal of Information Technology, 25(1), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanseth, O., & Monteiro, E. (1997). Inscribing behaviour in information infrastructure standards. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 7(4), 183–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanseth, O., and Monteiro, E. (1998) Year. Changing irreversible networks, ECIS, http://www.idi.ntnu.no/~ericm/ecis.html, pp. 1123–1139. Accessed 15 Jan 2018.

  • Hanseth, O., Monteiro, E., & Hatling, M. (1996). Developing information infrastructure: The tension between standardization and flexibility. Science, Technology & Human Values, 21(4), 407–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanseth, O., & Aanestad, M. (2003). Design as Bootstrapping. On the Evolution of Ict Networks in Health Care. Methods of Information in Medicine, 42(4), 384–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanseth, O., Jacucci, E., Grisot, M., & Aanestad, M. (2006). Reflexive standardization: side effects and complexity in standard making. MIS Quarterly, 30(Special Issue), 563–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herath, T., & Rao, H. R. (2009). Encouraging information security behaviors in organizations: role of penalties, pressures and perceived effectiveness. Decision Support Systems, 47(2), 154–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoberg, P., Wollersheim, J., and Krcmar, H. (2012). The Business Perspective on Cloud Computing-A Literature Review of Research on Cloud Computing, AMCIS, AISeL2012.

  • Hoffman, A. J. (1999). Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the US chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 351–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Q., Hart, P., & Cooke, D. (2007). The role of external and internal influences on information systems security–a neo-institutional perspective. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 16(2), 153–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iannacci, F. (2010). When is an information infrastructure? Investigating the emergence of public sector information infrastructures. European Journal of Information Systems, 19(1), 35–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • ITA. (2015). ITA G-cloud overview, ITA.

  • ITA (2018). Information Technology Authority.

  • Jepperson, R. L. (1991). Institutions, Institutional Effects, and Institutionalism. In W. W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 143–163). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jouini, M., and Rabai, L.B.A. (2019). A security framework for secure cloud computing environments, In Cloud security: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications, IGI Global, (pp. 249–263).

  • Katzan, H., Jr. (2010). On the privacy of cloud computing. International Journal of Management and Information Systems, 14(2), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, R. J., Ma, D., & Yu, M. (2018). A metrics suite of cloud computing adoption readiness. Electronic Markets, 28(1), 11–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, J. L., Gurbaxani, V., Kraemer, K. L., McFarlan, F. W., Raman, K., & Yap, C.-S. (1994). Institutional factors in information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 5(2), 139–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondra, A. Z., & Hurst, D. C. (2009). Institutional processes of organizational culture. Culture and Organization, 15(1), 39–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostova, T., Roth, K., & Dacin, M. T. (2008). Institutional theory in the study of multinational corporations: a critique and new directions. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 994–1006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, K.-H., Wong, C. W., & Cheng, T. E. (2006). Institutional isomorphism and the adoption of information technology for supply chain management. Computers in Industry, 57(1), 93–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lannacci, F. (2014). Routines, artefacts and technological change: Investigating the transformation of criminal justice in England and Wales. Journal of Information Technology, 29(4), 294–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. C. (2019). Adoption intention of cloud computing at the firm level. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 59(1), 61–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leimeister, S., Böhm, M., Riedl, C., and Krcmar, H. (2010). The business perspective of cloud computing: actors, roles and value networks, in ECIS Proceedings, AISeL, (pp. 1-12).

  • Liang, H., Saraf, N., Hu, Q., & Xue, Y. (2007). Assimilation of enterprise systems: the effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management. MIS Quarterly, 31(1), 59–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, C., Chen, Y., & Wu, M. (2011). Understanding the determinants of cloud computing adoption. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 111(7), 1006–1023.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood, M.A., Arslan, F., Dandu, J., and Udo, G. (2014). Impact of cloud computing adoption on firm stock Price–an empirical research, in AMCIS.

  • Marshall, B., Cardon, P., Poddar, A., & Fontenot, R. (2013). Does sample size matter in qualitative research?: a review of qualitative interviews in IS research. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 54(1), 11–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marston, S., Li, Z., Bandyopadhyay, S., Zhang, J., & Ghalsasi, A. (2011). Cloud computing—The business perspective. Decision Support Systems, 51(1), 176–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mell, P., & Grance, T. (2011a). The NIST definition of cloud computing (draft). NIST Special Publication, 800(145), 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mell, P., and Grance, T. (2011b). The NIST definition of cloud computing: Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, The National Institute of Standards and Technology - The US department of Commerce.

  • Meulen, R.V.D. (2017). Understanding Cloud Adoption in Government, in Gartner: https://www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/understanding-cloud-adoption-in-government/. Accessed 17 Jan 2018.

  • Mignerat, M., & Rivard, S. (2009). Positioning the institutional perspective in information systems research. Journal of Information Technology, 24(4), 369–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis : an expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). California: London, England.

  • Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. California: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • MoHOman (2013). MoH portal project summary, I. Department (ed.), ICT health: MoH OMan.

  • Monteiro, E., & Rolland, K. H. (2012). Trans-situated use of integrated information systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 21(6), 608–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteiro, E., Pollock, N., & Williams, R. (2014). Innovation in information infrastructures: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 15(4), 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, M. D. (1997). Qualitative research in information systems. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 21(2), 241–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, M. (2009). Qualitative Research in Business and Management. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, M. (2010). Qualitative research in information systems, Association for Information Systems, Available at: http://www.qual.auckland.ac.nz/). Accessed 20 Jan 2018.

  • Nielsen, P., & Aanestad, M. (2006). Control Devolution as Information Infrastructure Design Strategy: A Case Study of a Content Service Platform for Mobile Phones in Norway. Journal of Information Technology, 21(3), 85–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • NIST (2009). Working definition of cloud computing, in US government.

  • Oliveira, T., Thomas, M., & Espadanal, M. (2014). Assessing the determinants of cloud computing adoption: an analysis of the manufacturing and services sectors. Information & Management, 51(5), 497–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J., & Baroudi, J. J. (1991). Studying information technology in organizations: Research approaches and assumptions. Information Systems Research, 2(1), 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petkovic, I. (2010). CRM in the cloud (pp. 365–370). Subotica: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pipek, V., & Wulf, V. (2009). Infrastructuring: toward an integrated perspective on the design and use of information technology. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10(5), 447–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, D. (2016). Cloud adoption decisions: Benefitting from an integrated perspective. Electronic Journal Information Systems Evaluation, 19(1).

  • Ribes, D., & Finholt, T. A. (2009). The long now of technology infrastructure: articulating tensions in development. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10(5), 375–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson, C. (2002). Real World Research. A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers. MA. Boston: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabi, H. M., Uzoka, F.-M. E., Langmia, K., & Njeh, F. N. (2016). Conceptualizing a model for adoption of cloud computing in education. International Journal of Information Management, 36(2), 183–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabi, H. M., Uzoka, F. M. E., Langmia, K., Njeh, F. N., & Tsuma, C. K. (2018). A cross-country model of contextual factors impacting cloud computing adoption at universities in sub-Saharan Africa. Information Systems Frontiers, 20(6), 1381–1404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahay, S., Monteiro, E., & Aanestad, M. (2009). Configurable politics and asymmetric integration: Health e-infrastructures in India. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10(5), 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, M. N., Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2007). Research methods for business students, 4/e. Essex: Pearson Education Iimited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S., & Sunyaev, A. (2014). Determinant factors of cloud-sourcing decisions: reflecting on the IT outsourcing literature in the era of cloud computing. Journal of Information Technology, 31(1), 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, R. W. (2001). Institutions and organizations. London: Thousand Oaks Sage Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (2008). Approaching adulthood: The maturing of institutional theory. Theory and Society, 37(5), 427–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senarathna, I., Yeoh, W., Warren, M., & Salzman, S. (2016). Security and privacy concerns for australian smes cloud adoption: empirical study of metropolitan vs regional smes. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, (20).

  • Senyo, P. K., Addae, E., & Boateng, R. (2018). Cloud computing research: A review of research themes, frameworks, methods and future research directions. International Journal of Information Management, 38(1), 128–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silsand, L., & Ellingsen, G. (2014). Generification by Translation: Designing Generic Systems in Context of the Local. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 15(4), 177–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S. K., Al-Badi, A. H., Govindaluri, S. M., & Al-Kharusi, M. H. (2016). Predicting motivators of cloud computing adoption: A developing country perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 61–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L., & Ruhleder, K. (1996). Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: design and access for large information spaces. Information Systems Research, 7(1), 111–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svantesson, D., & Clarke, R. (2010). Privacy and consumer risks in cloud computing. Computer Law and Security Review, 26(4), 391–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teo, H. H., Wei, K. K., & Benbasat, I. (2003). Predicting intention to adopt Interorganizational linkages: an institutional perspective. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 19–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilson, D., Lyytinen, K., and Sorensen, C. (2010a). Desperately seeking the infrastructure in IS research: conceptualization of" digital convergence" as co-evolution of social and technical infrastructures. System Sciences (HICSS), 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on, IEEE2010a, 1–10.

  • Tilson, D., Lyytinen, K., & Sørensen, C. (2010b). Digital infrastructures: The missing IS research agenda 20th anniversary special issue of emerging challenges. Information Systems Research, 21(5), 748–759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolbert, P. S., & Zucker, L. G. (1994). Institutional Analyses of Organizations: Legitimate but Not Institutionalized. Institute for Social Science Research, Working Paper 1994-95, No.5, University of California, Los Angeles.

  • UNDP. (2015). Human development report 2015. United Nations Development Programme: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ure, J., Procter, R., Lin, Y.-W., Hartswood, M., Anderson, S., Lloyd, S., Wardlaw, J., Gonzalez-Velez, H., & Ho, K. (2009). The development of data infrastructures for ehealth: a socio-technical perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10(5), 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsham, G. (1995). Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems, 4(2), 74–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, N., Liang, H., Jia, Y., Ge, S., Xue, Y., & Wang, Z. (2016). Cloud computing research in the IS discipline: A citation/co-citation analysis. Decision Support Systems, 86, 35–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, E. (2000). Software and qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilczek, M. (2018). IT governance critical as cloud adoption soars to 96 percent in 2018, in CIO.

  • Yang, H., & Tate, M. (2012). A descriptive literature review and classification of cloud computing research. CAIS, (31), 2.

  • Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Washington: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youseff, L., Butrico, M., and Da Silva, D. (2008). Toward a unified ontology of cloud computing, Grid Computing Environments Workshop. GCE'08, IEEE2008, pp. 1–10.

  • Yuan, D., Yang, Y., Liu, X., & Chen, J. (2010). A data placement strategy in scientific cloud workflows. Future Generation Computer Systems, 26(8), 1200–1214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, D., Yang, Y., Liu, X., & Chen, J. (2011). On-demand minimum cost benchmarking for intermediate dataset storage in scientific cloud workflow systems. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 71(2), 316–332.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Muscat Municipality, P.O.Box 79, PC, 100, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman

    Khalid Alzadjali

  2. School of Management, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey, TE200EX, UK

    Amany Elbanna

Authors
  1. Khalid Alzadjali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amany Elbanna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khalid Alzadjali.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alzadjali, K., Elbanna, A. Smart Institutional Intervention in the Adoption of Digital Infrastructure: The Case of Government Cloud Computing in Oman. Inf Syst Front 22, 365–380 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09918-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09918-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation