Skip to main content
Log in

Why relevant chemical information cannot be exchanged without disclosing structures

  • Published:
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Both society and industry are interested in increasing the safety of pharmaceuticals. Potentially dangerous compounds could be filtered out at early stages of R&D by computer prediction of biological activity and ADMET characteristics. Accuracy of such predictions strongly depends on the quality & quantity of information contained in a training set. Suggestion that some relevant chemical information can be added to such training sets without disclosing chemical structures was generated at the recent ACS Symposium. We presented arguments that such safety exchange of relevant chemical information is impossible. Any relevant information about chemical structures can be used for search of either a particular compound itself or its close analogues. Risk of identifying such structures is enough to prevent pharma industry from relevant chemical information exchange.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. http://www.cas.org

  2. http://www.mdl.com/products/knowledge/crossfire_beilstein/

  3. http://www.chemfinder.com

  4. Bohacek R.S., McMartin C., Guida W.C., (1996) Med. Res. Rev. 16:3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pirmohamed M., Park B.K.. (2001) Trends Pharm. Sci. 22:298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Poroikov V.V., Filimonov D.A.J., 2002 Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 16:819

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Poroikov, V. and Filimonov, D. In Christoph Helma (Ed.), Predictive Toxicology, Taylor & Francis, 2005, pp. 459–478

  8. Van de Waterbeemd H., De Groot M., 2003 Nat. Rev. Drug. Discov. 2:192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Safe exchange of chemical information: can relevant chemical information be exchanged without disclosing chemical structures. Symposium in the framework of 229th␣National Spring ACS Meeting, San Diego, CA (March 13–17, 2005)

  10. http://www.mdl.com

  11. Filimonov D., Poroikov V., Borodina Yu., Gloriozova T., (1999) J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 39:666

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. http://cactus.nci.nih.gov

  13. Sadowski J., (1997) J. Comput. Aided. Mol. Des. 11:53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Baurin N., Mozziconacci J.-C., Arnoult E., Chavatte P., Marot C., Morin-Allory L., (1997) J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 44:276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fang X., Shao L., Zhang H., Wang S., (1997) J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 44:249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. http://www.prestwickchemical.com

  17. Poroikov V.V., Filimonov D.A., Ihlenfeldt W.-D., Gloriozova T.A., Lagunin A.A., Borodina Yu.V., Stepanchikova A.V., Nicklaus M.C., 2003 J. Chem. Inform. Comput. Sci. 43:228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Schneier, B. Secrets and Lies: Digital Security in a Networked World. John Wiley & Sons, 2000, p. 432

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dmitry Filimonov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Filimonov, D., Poroikov, V. Why relevant chemical information cannot be exchanged without disclosing structures. J Comput Aided Mol Des 19, 705–713 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-005-9014-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-005-9014-2

Kew words

Navigation