Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Docking and multivariate methods to explore HIV-1 drug-resistance: a comparative analysis

  • Published:
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we describe a comparative analysis between multivariate and docking methods in the study of the drug resistance to the reverse transcriptase and the protease inhibitors. In our early papers we developed a simple but efficient method to evaluate the features of compounds that are less likely to trigger resistance or are effective against mutant HIV strains, using the multivariate statistical procedures PCA and DA. In the attempt to create a more solid background for the prediction of susceptibility or resistance, we carried out a comparative analysis between our previous multivariate approach and molecular docking study. The intent of this paper is not only to find further support to the results obtained by the combined use of PCA and DA, but also to evidence the structural features, in terms of molecular descriptors, similarity, and energetic contributions, derived from docking, which can account for the arising of drug-resistance against mutant strains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

NNRTIs:

Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors

PIs:

Protease inhibitors

PR:

Protease

RT:

Reverse transcriptase

References

  1. Hammer S, Vaida F, Bennett K, Holohan M, Sheiner L, Eron J, Wheat L, Mitsuyasu R, Gulick R, Valentine F, Aberg J, Rogers M, Karol C, Saah A, Lewis R, Bessen L, Brosgart C, DeGruttola V, Mellors J (2002) J Am Med Assoc 288:169

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gallant J (2000) J Am Med Assoc 283:1329

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Carpenter C, Cooper D, Fischl M, Gatell J, Gazzard B, Hammer S, Hirsch M, Jacobsen D, Katzenstein D, Montaner J, Richman D, Saag M, Schechter M, Schooley R, Thompson M, Vella S, Yeni P, Volberding P (2000) J Am Med Assoc 283:381

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hirsch M, Richman D (2000) J Am Med Assoc 284:1649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rusconi S, La Seta Catamancio S, Sheridan F, Parker D (2000) J Clin Virol 19:135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Holodniy M, Katzenstein D, Winters M, Montoya J, Shafer R, Kozal M, Ragni M, Merigan T (1993) J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 6:366

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Schuurman R, Demeter L, Reichelderfer P, Tijnagel J, de Groot T, Boucher C (1999) J Clin Microbiol 37:2291

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Race E, Gilbert S, Sheldon J, Rose J, Moffatt A, Sitbon G, Dissanayeke S, Cammack N, Duncan I (1998) AIDS 12:1465

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Shafer R (2002) Clin Microbiol Rev 15:247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Schinazi R, Larder B, Mellors J (2000) Int Antiv News 8:65

    Google Scholar 

  11. Baxter J, Mayers D, Wentworth D, Neaton J, Hoover M, Winters M, Mannheimer S, Thompson M, Abrams D, Brizz B (2000) AIDS 14:F83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Holloway M, Wai J, Halgren T, Fitzgerald P, Vacca J, Dorsey B, Levin R, Thompson W, Chen L, deSolms S (1995) J Med Chem 38:305

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nair A, Jayatilleke P, Wang X, Miertus S, Welsh W (2002) J Med Chem 45:973

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Perez C, Pastor M, Ortiz A, Gago F (1998) J Med Chem 41:836

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Shenderovich M, Kagan R, Heseltine P, Ramnarayan K (2003) Protein Sci 12:1706

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jenwitheesuk E, Samudrala R (2005) Antivir Ther 10:157

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Almerico AM, Lauria A, Tutone M, Diana P, Barraja P, Montalbano A, Cirrincione G, Dattolo G (2003) QSAR Comb Sci 22:984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Almerico AM, Tutone M, Lauria A, Diana P, Barraja P, Montalbano A, Cirrincione G, Dattolo G (2006) J Chem Inf Model 46:168

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. http://www.niaid.nih.gov/daids/dtpdb

  20. http://www.rcsb.org/pdb

  21. All of the calculations were run on a Silicon Graphics Indigo II workstation using the software TSAR 3.2 (Tools for Structure Activity Relationships), VAMP 6.0, and ASP 3.2 (Automated Similarity Packages) (Oxford Molecular-Accelrys). Molecular descriptors were derived according to the method and assumptions reported in the TSAR 3.2 Reference Guide, Oxford Molecular Limited (1998)

  22. Ligandfit User Manual, Accelrys Inc (2003)

  23. Venkatachalam C, Jiang X, Oldfield T, Waldman M (2003) J Mol Graph Model 21:289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Böhm H (1998) J Comput Aided Mol Des 12:309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Verkhivker G, Bouzida D, Gehlhaar D, Rejto P, Arthurs S, Colson A, Freer S, Larson V, Luty B, Marrone T, Rose P (2000) J Comput Aided Mol Des 14:731

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gehlhaar D, Verkhivker G, Rejto P, Sherman C, Fogel D, Fogel L, Freer S (1995) Chem Biol 2:317

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Muegge I, Martin Y (1999) J Med Chem 42:791

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Maria Almerico.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Almerico, A.M., Tutone, M. & Lauria, A. Docking and multivariate methods to explore HIV-1 drug-resistance: a comparative analysis. J Comput Aided Mol Des 22, 287–297 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-008-9186-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-008-9186-7

Keywords

Navigation