Abstract
Folate receptor α (FRα) is a cell surface, glycophosphatidylinositol-anchored protein which has focussed attention as a therapeutic target and as a marker for the diagnosis of cancer. It has a high affinity for the dietary supplemented folic acid (FOL), carrying out endocytic transport across the cell membrane and delivering the folate at the acidic pH of the endosome. Starting from the recently reported X-ray structure at pH 7, 100 ns classical molecular dynamics simulations have been carried out on the FRα-FOL complex; moreover, the ligand dissociation process has been studied by metadynamics, a recently reported method for the analysis of free-energy surfaces (FES), providing clues on the intermediate states and their energy terms. Multiple dissociation runs were considered to enhance the configurational sampling; a final clustering of conformations within the averaged FES provides the representative structures of several intermediate states, within an overall barrier for ligand escape of about 75 kJ/mol. Escaping of FOL to solvent occurs while only minor changes affect the FRα conformation of the binding pocket. During dissociation, the FOL molecule translates and rotates around a turning point located in proximity of the receptor surface. FOL at this transition state assumes an “L” shaped conformation, with the pteridin ring oriented to optimize stacking within W102 and W140 residues, and the negatively charged glutamate tail, outside the receptor, interacting with the positively charged R103 and R106 residues, that contrary to the bound state, are solvent exposed. We show that metadynamics method can provide useful insights at the atomistic level on the effects of point-mutations affecting functionality, thus being a very promising tool for any study related to folate-targeted drug delivery or cancer therapies involving folate uptake.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Antony AC (1992) Blood 79:2807–2820
Chancy CD, Kekuda R, Huang W, Prasad PD, Kuhnel JM, Sirotnak FM, Roon P, Ganapathy V, Smith SB (2000) J Biol Chem 275:20676–20684
Clifton GT, Sears AK, Clive KS, Holmes JP, Mittendorf EA, Ioannides CG, Ponniah S, Peoples GE (2011) Hum Vaccin 7:183–90
Solanky N, Requena Jimenez A, D’Souza SW, Sibley CP, Glazier JD (2010) Placenta 31:134–43
Weitman SD, Lark RH, Coney LR, Fort DW, Frasca V, Zurawski VR Jr, Kamen BA (1992) Cancer Res 52:3396–3401
Matherly LH, Goldman DI (2003) Vitam Horm 66:403–456
Dosio F, Milla P, Cattel L (2010) Curr Opin Investig Drugs 11:1424–1433
Maeng JH, Lee DH, Jung KH, Bae YH, Park IS, Jeong S, Jeon YS, Shim CK, Kim W, Kim J, Lee J, Lee YM, Kim JH, Kim WH, Hong SS (2010) Biomaterials 31:4995–5006
Monaco HL (1997) EMBO J 16:1475–1483
Della-Longa S, Arcovito A (2013) J Mol Graph Model 44:197–207
Chen C, Ke J, Zhou XE, Yi W, Brunzelle JS, Li J, Yong EL, Xu HE, Melcher K (2013) Nature 500:486–489
Berendsen HJC, van der Spoel D, van Drunen R (1995) Comput Phys Commun 91:43–56
Hess B, Kutzner C, Lindhal E (2008) J Chem Theory Comput 4:435–447
Hornak V, Abel R, Okur A, Strockbine B, Roitberg A, Simmerling C (2006) Proteins 65:712–725
Klamt A, Schuurmann G (1993) J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 2:799–805
Breneman CM, Wiberg KB (1990) J Comput Chem 11:361–373
Neese F University of Bonn, Germany
Bussi G, Donadio D, Parrinello M (2007) J Chem Phys 126:014101
Berendsen HJC, Postma JPM, van Gunsteren WF, Di Nola A, Haak JR (1984) J. Chem. Phys. 81:3684–3690
Laio A, Parrinello M (2002) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:12562–12566
Tribello GA, Bonomi M, Branduardi D, Camilloni C, Bussi G (2014) Comput Phys Commun 185:604–613
Laio A, Rodriguez-Fortea A, Gervasio FL, Ceccarelli M, Parrinello M (2005) J Phys Chem B 109:6714–6721
Vargiu AV, Ruggerone P, Magistrato A, Carloni P (2008) Nucleic Acids Res 36:5910–5921
Daura X, Gademann K, Jaun B, Seeback D, van Gusteren WF, Mark AE (1999) Angew Chem Int Ed 38:236–240
Wibowo AS, Singh M, Reeder KM, Carter JJ, Kovach AR, Meng W, Ratnam M, Zhang F, Dann CE III (2013) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:15180–15188
Maziarz KM, Monaco HL, Shen F, Ratnam M (1999) J Biol Chem 274:11086–11091
Acknowledgments
Thanks are due to Prof. P. D’ Angelo and Dr. V. Migliorati for stimulating discussions and their help in comparing results from different quantum chemistry methods used to build-up the FOL partial charges. Financial support by the Italian Ministry of University and Research [Linea D1 Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore] is gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary material 1 (MOV 14790 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (AVI 4840 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Della-Longa, S., Arcovito, A. Intermediate states in the binding process of folic acid to folate receptor α: insights by molecular dynamics and metadynamics. J Comput Aided Mol Des 29, 23–35 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-014-9801-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-014-9801-8