Skip to main content
Log in

Ligand-based virtual screening under partial shape constraints

  • Published:
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ligand-based virtual screening has proven to be a viable technology during the search for new lead structures in drug discovery. Despite the rapidly increasing number of published methods, meaningful shape matching as well as ligand and target flexibility still remain open challenges. In this work, we analyze the influence of knowledge-based sterical constraints on the performance of the recently published ligand-based virtual screening method mRAISE. We introduce the concept of partial shape matching enabling a more differentiated view on chemical structure. The new method is integrated into the LBVS tool mRAISE providing multiple options for such constraints. The applied constraints can either be derived automatically from a protein–ligand complex structure or by manual selection of ligand atoms. In this way, the descriptor directly encodes the fit of a ligand into the binding site. Furthermore, the conservation of close contacts between the binding site surface and the query ligand can be enforced. We validated our new method on the DUD and DUD-E datasets. Although the statistical performance remains on the same level, detailed analysis reveal that for certain and especially very flexible targets a significant improvement can be achieved. This is further highlighted looking at the quality of calculated molecular alignments using the recently introduced mRAISE dataset. The new partial shape constraints improved the overall quality of molecular alignments especially for difficult targets with highly flexible or different sized molecules. The software tool mRAISE is freely available on Linux operating systems for evaluation purposes and academic use (see http://www.zbh.uni-hamburg.de/raise).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lavecchia A, Di Giovanni C (2013) Virtual screening strategies in drug discovery: a critical review. Curr Med Chem 20(23):2839–2860

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Schomburg KT, Bietz S, Briem H, Henzler AM, Urbaczek S, Rarey M (2014) Facing the challenges of structure-based target prediction by inverse virtual screening. J Chem Inf Model 54:1676–1686

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Henzler AM, Urbaczek S, Hilbig M, Rarey M (2014) An integrated approach to knowledge-driven structure-based virtual screening. J Comput Aided Mol Des 28:927–939

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. von Behren MM, Bietz S, Nittinger E, Rarey M (2016) mRAISE: an alternative algorithmic approach to ligand-based virtual screening. J Comput Aided Mol Des 30:583–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Grant JA, Gallardo MA, Pickup BT (1996) A fast method of molecular shape comparison: a simple application of a gaussian description of molecular shape. J Comput Chem 17(14):1653–1666

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Vainio MJ, Puranen JS, Johnson MS (2009) ShaEP: molecular overlay based on shape and electrostatic potential. J Chem Inf Model 49:492–502

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Vaz de Lima LA, Nascimento AS (2013) MolShaCS: a free and open source tool for ligand similarity identification based on Gaussian descriptors. Eur J Med Chem 59:296–303

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Roy A, Skolnick J (2015) LIGSIFT: an open-source tool for ligand structural alignment and virtual screening. Bioinformatics 31:539–544

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Taminau J, Thijs G, De Winter H (2008) Pharao: pharmacophore alignment and optimization. J Mol Graph Model 27:161–169

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nittinger E, Schneider N, Lange G, Rarey M (2015) Evidence of water molecules-a statistical evaluation of water molecules based on electron density. J Chem Inf Model 55:771–783

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. von Behren MM, Volkamer A, Henzler AM, Schomburg KT, Urbaczek S, Rarey M (2013) Fast protein binding site comparison via an index-based screening technology. J Chem Inf Model 53(2):411–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kitchen DB, Decornez H, Furr JR, Bajorath J (2004) Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications. Nat Rev Drug Discov 3:935–949

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wei DQ, Zhang R, Du QS, Gao WN, Li Y, Gao H, Wang SQ, Zhang X, Li AX, Sirois S, Chou KC (2006) Anti-SARS drug screening by molecular docking. Amino Acids 31:73–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Barreiro G, Guimaraes CR, Tubert-Brohman I, Lyons TM, Tirado-Rives J, Jorgensen WL (2007) Search for non-nucleoside inhibitors of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase using chemical similarity, molecular docking, and MM-GB/SA scoring. J Chem Inf Model 47(6):2416–2428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tikhonova IG, Sum CS, Neumann S, Engel S, Raaka BM, Costanzi S, Gershengorn MC (2008) Discovery of novel agonists and antagonists of the free fatty acid receptor 1 (FFAR1) using virtual screening. J Med Chem 51:625–633

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lin TW, Melgar MM, Kurth D, Swamidass SJ, Purdon J, Tseng T, Gago G, Baldi P, Gramajo H, Tsai SC (2006) Structure-based inhibitor design of AccD5, an essential acyl-CoA carboxylase carboxyltransferase domain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:3072–3077

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Vidal D, Thormann M, Pons M (2006) A novel search engine for virtual screening of very large databases. J Chem Inf Model 46(2):836–843

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mestres J, Knegtel RM (2000) Similarity versus docking in 3d virtual screening. Perspect Drug Discov Des 20(1):191–207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Huang N, Shoichet Brian K, Irwin JJ (2006) Benchmarking sets for molecular docking. J Med Chem 49(23):6789–6801

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mysinger MM, Carchia M, Irwin JJ, Shoichet BK (2012) Directory of useful decoys, enhanced (DUD-E): better ligands and decoys for better benchmarking. J. Med. Chem. 55:6582–6594

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wu K (2005) Fastbit: an efficient indexing technology for accelerating data-intensive science. J Phys 16(1):556

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bietz S, Rarey M (2016) SIENA: efficient compilation of selective protein binding site ensembles. J Chem Inf Model 56:248–259

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hilbig M, Rarey M (2015) MONA 2: a light cheminformatics platform for interactive compound library processing. J Chem Inf Model 55:2071–2078

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthias Rarey.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (pdf 11076 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

von Behren, M.M., Rarey, M. Ligand-based virtual screening under partial shape constraints. J Comput Aided Mol Des 31, 335–347 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-017-0011-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-017-0011-z

Keywords

Navigation