Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Velocity-Based Planning of Rapid Elbow Movements Expands the Control Scheme of the Equilibrium Point Hypothesis

  • Published:
Journal of Computational Neuroscience Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

According to the equilibrium point hypothesis of voluntary motor control, control action of muscles is not explicitly computed, but rather arises as a consequence of interaction between moving equilibrium position, current kinematics and stiffness of the joint. This approach is attractive as it obviates the need to explicitly specify the forces controlling limb movements. However, many debatable aspects of this hypothesis remain in the manner of specification of the equilibrium point trajectory and muscle activation (or its stiffness), which elicits a restoring force toward the planned equilibrium trajectory. In this study, we expanded the framework of this hypothesis by assuming that the control system uses the velocity measure as the origin of subordinate variables scaling descending commands. The velocity command is translated into muscle control inputs by second order pattern generators, which yield reciprocal command and coactivation commands, and create alternating activation of the antagonistic muscles during movement and coactivation in the post-movement phase, respectively. The velocity command is also integrated to give a position command specifying a moving equilibrium point. This model is purely kinematics-dependent, since the descending commands needed to modulate the visco-elasticity of muscles are implicitly given by simple parametric specifications of the velocity command alone. The simulated movements of fast elbow single-joint movements corresponded well with measured data performed over a wide range of movement distances, in terms of both muscle excitations and kinematics. Our proposal on a synthesis for the equilibrium point approach and velocity command, may offer some insights into the control scheme of the single-joint arm movements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barto AG, Fagg AH, Stikoff N, Houk JC (1999) A cerebellar model of timing and prediction in the control of reaching. Neural. Comp. 11: 565–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennet DJ (1993) Torques generated at the human elbow joint in response to constant position errors imposed during voluntary movements. Exp. Brain Res. 95: 488–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berardelli A, Hallet M, Rothwell JC, Agostino R, Manfredi M, Thompson PD, Marsden CD (1996) Single-joint rapid arm movements in normal subjects and in patients with motor disorder. Brain 119(2): 661–674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berardelli A, Rothwell JC, Day BL, Kachi T, Marsden CD (1984) Duration of the first agonist EMG burst in ballistic arm movements. Brain Res. 304: 183–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bizzi E, Accornero N, Chapple W, Hogan N (1984) Posture control and trajectory formation during arm movement. J. Neurosci. 4(11): 2738–2744.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bizzi E, Hogan N, Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Giszter S (1992) Does the nervous system use equilibrium-point control to guide single- and multiple joint movements? Behav. Brain Sci. 15: 603–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braitenberg V, Heck D, Sultan F (1997) The detection and generation of sequences as a key to cerebellar function: Experiments and theory. Behav. Brain Sci. 20(2): 229–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks VB, Thach WT, (1981) Cerebellar control of posture and movement. In: Brooks VB, ed. Handbook of Physiology. The Nervous System. Motor Control. Am. Physiol. Soc., Bethesda, MD, Sect. 1, Vol II, pp. 877–946.

  • Burdet E, Osu R, Franklin DW, Milner TE, Kawato M, (2001) The central nervous system stabilizes unstable dynamics by learning optimal impedance. Nature 414: 446–449.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon SC, Zahalak GI, (1982) The mechanical behavior of active human skeletal muscle in small oscillation. J. Biomech. 15: 111–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheron C, Godaux E, (1986) Self-terminated fast movement of the forearm in man: Amplitude dependence of the triple burst pattern. J. Biophys. Biomech. 10: 109–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corcos DM, Gottlieb GL, Agarwal GC, (1989) Organizing principle for single-joint movements. II. A speed-sensitive strategy. J. Neurophysiol. 62: 358–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLuca CJ, Mambrito B, (1987) Voluntary control of motor units in human antagonist muscles: Coactivation and reciprocal activation. J. Neurophysiol. 58: 525–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evinger C, Fuchs AF, (1978) Saccadic, smooth pursuit and optokinetic eye movements of the trained cat. J. Physiol., (Lond.) 285: 209–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman AG, Adamovich SV, Ostry DJ, Flanagan JR, (1990) The origin of electromyogram- Explanation based on the equilibrium point hypothesis. In: JM Winter, SL-Y Woo,(eds) Multiple Muscle Systems: Biomechanics and Movement Organization. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 195–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flash T, (1987) The control of hand equilibrium trajectories in multi-joint arm movements. Biol. Cybern. 57: 257–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freund H-J, Büdingen HJ, (1978) The relationships between speed and amplitude of fast voluntary contraction of human arm muscle. Exp. Brain Res. 31: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frysinger RC, Bourbonnais D, Kalaska JJ, Smith AM, (1984) Cerebeller cortical activity during antagonist cocontraction and reciprocal inhibition of fore-arm muscles. J. Neurophysiol. 51: 32–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs AF, Luschei ES, (1970) Firing patterns of abducens neurons of alert monkeys in relationship to horizontal eye movement. J. Neurophysiol. 33: 382–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghez C, (1979) Contributions of central programs to rapid limb movement in the cat. In: H Asanuma, VJ Wilson,(eds) Integration in the nervous system. Igaku-Shoin, Tokyo, pp. 305–320.

  • Ghez C, Martin JH, (1982) The control of rapid limb movement in the cat. III. Agonist-antagonist coupling. Exp. Brain Res. 45: 115–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gielen CCAM, Houk JC, (1984) Nonliner viscosity of human wrist. J. Neurophysiol. 52: 553–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomi H, Kawato M, (1997) Equilibrium-point control hypothesis examined by measured arm stiffness during multijoint movement. Science 272: 117–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb GL, (1996) On the voluntary movement of compliant, (inertial-visco-elastic) loads by percellated control mechanics. J. Neurophysiol. 76: 3207–3229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb GL, Agarwal GC, (1980) Response to sudden torques about ankle in man. III. Suppression of stretch evoked responses during phasic contraction. J. Neurophysiol. 44: 233–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb GL, Chen C-H, Corcos DM, (1996) Nonlinear control of movement distance at the human elbow. Exp. Brain Res. 112: 289–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb GL, Corcos DM, Agarwal GC, (1989) Organizing principle for single-joint movements. I. A speed-insensitive strategy. J. Neurophysiol. 62: 342–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gribble PL, Ostry DJ, (1998) Independent coactivation of shoulder and elbow muscles. Exp. Brain Res. 123: 355–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gribble PL, Ostry DJ, Sanguineti V, Laboissière R, (1998) Are complex control signals required for human arm movement. J. Neurophysiol. 79: 1409–1424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grillner S, (1981) Control of locomotion in bipeds, tetrapods, and fish. In: VB Brooks, ed. Handbook of Physiology. The Nervous System. Motor Control. Am. Physiol. Soc., Bethesda, MD, Sect. 1, Vol II, pp. 1171–1236.

  • Hainaut K, Duchateau J, Desmedt J, (1981) Differential effects on slow and fast motor units of different programs of brief daily muscle training in man. In: Desmedt ed. Progress in Clinical Neurophysiology. Motor unit Types, Recruitment and Plasticity in Health and Disease, Karger, Basel, Vol 9, pp. 241–249.

  • Hallet M, Marsden CD, (1979) Ballistic flexion movements of the human thumb. J. Physiol., (Lond) 294: 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallet M, Shahani BT, Young RR, (1975) EMG analysis of stereotyped voluntary movements in man. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 38: 1154–1162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinricks RN, (1985) Regression equations to predict segmental moments of inertia from anthropometric measurements: An extension of the data of Chandler et al., (1975). J. Biomech. 23: 949–951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman DS, Strick PL, (1990) Step-tracking movements of the wrist in humans. II. EMG analysis. J. Neurosci. 10: 142–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman DS, Strick PL, (1993) Step-tracking movements of the wrist in humans. III. Influence of changes in load on patterns of muscle activity. J. Neurosci. 13: 5212–5227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan N, (1985) The mechanics of multi-joint posture and movement control. Biol. Cybern. 52: 315–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan N, Bizzi E, Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Flash T, (1987) Controlling multijoint motor behaviors. Exer. Sport Sci. Rev. 15: 153–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hore J, Wild B, Diener H-C, (1991) Cerebellar Dysmetria at the elbow, wrist and fingers. J. Neurophysiol. 65: 563–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey DR, Reed DJ, (1981) Separate cortical systems for control of joint movement and joint stiffness: reciprocal activation and co-activation of antagonist muscles. In: JE Desmedt ed. Advances in Neurology. Motor Control Mechanisms in Health and Disease. Raven, New York, Vol 39, pp. 347–372.

  • Jankowska E, Padel Y, Tanaka R, (1976) Disynaptic inhibition of spinal motoneurons from the motor cortex in the monkey. J. Physiol., (Lond) 258: 467–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearnery RE, Hunter IW, (1990) System identification of human joint dynamics. CRC Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 18: 55–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacquaniti F, Moioli C, (1989) The role of preparation in tuning anticipatory and reflex responses during catching. J. Neurosci. 9: 134–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lan N, Crago PE, (1994) Optimal control of antagonist muscle stiffness during voluntary movements. Biol. Cybern. 71: 123–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latash ML, Gottlieb GL, (1991) Reconstruction of elbow joint compliant characteristics during fast and slow voluntary movements. Neuroscience 43: 697–712.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Latash ML, Goodman SR, (1994) An equilibrium-point model of electromyographic patterns during single-joint movements based on experimentally reconstructed control signals. J. Electromyog. Kinesiol. 4: 230–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner TE, (2002) Adaptation to destabilizing dynamics by means of muscle cocontraction. Exp. Brain Res. 143: 406–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner TE, Cloutier C, (1993) Compensation for mechanically unstable loading in voluntary wrist movement. Exp. Brain Res. 94: 522–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner TE, Cloutier C, (1998) Damping of the wrist joint during voluntary movement. Exp. Brain Res. 122: 309–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mussa-Ivaldi, Bizzi E, (2000) Motor learning through the combination of primitives. Phil. Trans R. Soc. Lond. 355: 1755–1769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osu R, Franklin DW, Kato H, Gomi H, Domen K, Yoshioka T, Kawato M, (2001) Short- and long-term changes in joint co-contraction associated with motor learning as revealed from surface EMG. J. Neurophysiol. 88: 991–1004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osu R, Gomi H, (1999) Multi-joint muscle regulation mechanism examined by measured human-arm stiffness and EMG signals. J. Neurophysiol. 81: 1458–1468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfann KD, Hoffman DS, Gottlieb GL, Strick PL, Corcos DM, (1998) Common principles underlying the control of rapid single degree-of-freedom movements at different joints. Exp. Brain Res. 118: 35–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rack PMH, (1981) Limitations of somatosensory feedback in control of posture and movement. In: VB Brooks, ed. Handbook of Physiology. The Nervous System. Motor Control. Am. Physiol. Soc., Bethesda, MD, Sect. 1, Vol. II, pp. 229–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rack PMH, Westbury DR, (1969) The effects of length and stimulus rate on tension in the isometric cat soleus muscle. J. Physiol., (Lond.) 204: 443–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson DA, (1970) Oculomotor unit behavior in the monkey. J Neurophysiol 33: 393–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson DA, (1986) Is the oculomotor system a cartoon of motor control. Progress in Brain Res. 64: 411–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson DA, (1989) Integration with neurons. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 13: 33–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell JC, Day BL, Berardelli A, Marsden CD, (1984) Effects of motor cortex stimulation on spinal interneurons in man. Exp. Brain Res. 54: 382–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seki K, Perlmutter SI, Fetz EE, (2003) Sensory input to primate spinal cord is presynaptically inhibited during voluntary movement. Nature Neurosci. 6: 1309–1016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soechting JF, Dufrensne JR, Lacquaniti F, (1981) Time-varying properties of myotatic responses in man during some simple motor tasks. J. Neurophysiol. 46: 1226–1243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki M, Shiller DM, Gribble PL, Ostry DJ, (2001) Relationship between cocontraction, movement kinematics and phasic muscle activity in single-joint arm movement. Exp. Brain Res. 140: 171–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki M, Yamazaki Y, Matsunami K, (1994) Relationship between force and electromyographic activity during rapid isometric contraction in power grip. Electroencephalog. clinical Neurophysiol. 93: 218–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoroughman KA, Shadmehr R, (1999) Electromyographic correlates of learning model of reaching movements. J. Neurosci. 19(9): 8573–8588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topka H, Mescheriakov S, Boose A, Kuntz R, Hertrich I, Seydel L Dichgans J, Rothwell J, (1999) A cerebellar-like terminal and postural tremor induced in normal man by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain 122: 1551–1562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadman WJ, Denier van der Gon JJ, Geuze RH, Mol CR, (1979) Control of fast goal-directed arm movements. J. Hum. Mov. Stud. 5: 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf SL, Segal RL, (1996) Reducing human biceps brachii spinal stretch reflex magnitude. J. Neurophysiol. 75: 1637–1646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu CH, Houk JC, Young KY, Miller LE, (1990) Nonlinear damping of limb motion. In: JM Winter, SL-Y Woo,(eds) Multiple Muscle Systems. Biomechanics and Movement Organization. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 214–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamazaki Y, Ohkuwa T, Itoh H, Suzuki M, (1994) Reciprocal activation and coactivation in antagonistic muscles during rapid goal-directed movements. Brain Res. Bull. 34: 587–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamazaki Y, Suzuki M, Mano T, (1993) Control of rapid elbow extension movement. Brain Res. Bull. 30: 11–19.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Kinjo Gakuin University, Nagoya, 463-8521, Japan

    Masataka Suzuki

  2. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Nagoya, 466-8555, Japan

    Yoshihiko Yamazaki

Authors
  1. Masataka Suzuki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yoshihiko Yamazaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masataka Suzuki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Suzuki, M., Yamazaki, Y. Velocity-Based Planning of Rapid Elbow Movements Expands the Control Scheme of the Equilibrium Point Hypothesis. J Comput Neurosci 18, 131–149 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10827-005-6555-2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10827-005-6555-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation