Skip to main content
Log in

Factors affecting phase synchronization in integrate-and-fire oscillators

  • Published:
Journal of Computational Neuroscience Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Step changes in input current are known to induce partial phase synchrony in ensembles of leaky integrate-and-fire neurons operating in the oscillatory or “regular firing” regime. An analysis of this phenomenon in the absence of noise is presented based on the probability flux within an ensemble of generalized integrate-and-fire neurons. It is shown that the induction of phase synchrony by a step input can be determined by calculating the ratio of the voltage densities obtained from fully desynchronized ensembles firing at the pre and post-step firing rates. In the limit of low noise and in the absence of phase synchrony, the probability density as a function of voltage is inversely proportional to the time derivative along the voltage trajectory. It follows that the magnitude of phase synchronization depends on the degree to which a change in input leads to a uniform multiplication of the voltage derivative over the range from reset to spike threshold. This analysis is used to investigate several factors affecting phase synchronization including high firing rates, inputs modeled as conductances rather than currents, peri-threshold sodium currents, and spike-triggered potassium currents. Finally, we show that without noise, the equilibrium ensemble density is proportional to the phase response curve commonly used to analyze oscillatory systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amari S (1974) A method of statistical neurodynamics. Kybernetik 14(4): 201–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown E, Moehlis J, Holmes P (2004a) On the phase reduction and response dynamics of neural oscillator populations. Neural Comput. 16(4): 673–715.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown E, Moehlis J, Holmes P, Clayton E, Rajkowski J, Aston-Jones G (2004b) The influence of spike rate and stimulus duration on noradrenergic neurons. J. Comput. Neurosci. 17(1): 13–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunel N (2000) Dynamics of sparsely connected networks of excitatory and inhibitory spiking neurons. J. Comput. Neurosci. 8(3): 183–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ermentrout B (1996) Type I membranes, phase resetting curves, and synchrony. Neural Comput. 8(5): 979–1001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ermentrout B, Kopell N (1986) Symmetry and phaselocking in chains of weakly coupled oscillators. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 39(5): 623–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fourcaud-Trocme N, Brunel N (2005) Dynamics of the instantaneous firing rate in response to changes in input statistics. J. Comput. Neurosci. 18(3): 311–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fourcaud-Trocme N, Hansel D, van Vreeswijk C, Brunel N (2003) How spike generation mechanisms determine the neuronal response to fluctuating inputs. J. Neurosci. 23(37): 11628–11640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerstner W (2000) Population dynamics of spiking neurons: Fast transients, asynchronous states, and locking. Neural Comput. 12(1): 43–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerstner W, Kistler W (2002) Spiking Neuron Models. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK.

  • Gutkin B, Ermentrout G, Reyes A (2005) Phase-response curves give the responses of neurons to transient inputs. J. Neurophysiol. 94: 1623–1635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansel D, Mato G, Meunier C (1995) Synchrony in excitatory neural networks. Neural Comput. 7(2): 307–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermann A, Gerstner W (2001) Noise and the PSTH response to current transients: I. General theory and application to the integrate-and-fire neuron. J. Comput. Neurosci. 11(2): 135–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoppensteadt F, Izhikevich E (1997) Weakly Connected Neural Networks. Springer, New York.

  • Izhikevich E (2003) Simple model of spiking neurons. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 14: 1569–1572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight B (1972) Dynamics of encoding in a population of neurons. J. Gen. Physiol. 59(6): 734–766.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight B, A, A. O, Sirovich L (2000) The approach of a neuron population firing rate to a new equilibrium: An exact theoretical result. Neural Comput. 12(5): 1045–1055.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latham P, Richmond B, Nelson P, Nirenberg S (2000) Intrinsic dynamics in neuronal networks. I. Theory. J. Neurophysiol. 83: 808–827.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madison D, Nicoll R (1984) Control of the repetitive discharge of rat CA1 pyramidal neurones in vitro. J. Physiol. 354: 319–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Bote R, Parga N (2005) Membrane potential and response properties of populations of cortical neurons in the high conductance state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94: 088103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naundorf B, Geisel T, Wolf F (2005) Action potential onset dynamics and the response speed of neuronal populations. J. Comput. Neurosci. 18(3): 297–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nykamp D, Tranchina D (2000) A population density approach that facilitates large-scale modeling of neural networks: Analysis and an application to orientation tuning. J. Comput. Neurosci. 8(1): 19–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omurtag A, Knight B, Sirovich L (2000) On the simulation of large populations of neurons. J. Comput. Neurosci. 8(1): 51–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riccardi L (1977) Diffusion Processes and Related Topics in Biology. Springer-Verlag.

  • Salinas E, Sejnowski T (2001) Correlated neuronal activity and the flow of neural information. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2(8): 539–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein R (1965) A theoretical analysis of neuronal variability. Biophys. J. 91: 173–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson H, Cowan J (1972) Excitatory and inhibitory interactions in localized populations of model neurons. Biophys. J. 12(1): 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Todd W. Troyer.

Additional information

Action Editor: John Rinzel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Troyer, T.W. Factors affecting phase synchronization in integrate-and-fire oscillators. J Comput Neurosci 20, 191–200 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10827-006-6174-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10827-006-6174-6

Keywords

Navigation