Abstract
The early processing of sensory information by neuronal circuits often includes a reshaping of activity patterns that may facilitate further processing in the brain. For instance, in the olfactory system the activity patterns that related odors evoke at the input of the olfactory bulb can be highly similar. Nevertheless, the corresponding activity patterns of the mitral cells, which represent the output of the olfactory bulb, can differ significantly from each other due to strong inhibition by granule cells and peri-glomerular cells. Motivated by these results we study simple adaptive inhibitory networks that aim to separate or even orthogonalize activity patterns representing similar stimuli. Since the animal experiences the different stimuli at different times it is difficult for the network to learn the connectivity based on their similarity; biologically it is more plausible that learning is driven by simultaneous correlations between the input channels. We investigate the connection between pattern orthogonalization and channel decorrelation and demonstrate that networks can achieve effective pattern orthogonalization through channel decorrelation if they simultaneously equalize their output levels. In feedforward networks biophysically plausible learning mechanisms fail, however, for even moderately similar input patterns. Recurrent networks do not have that limitation; they can orthogonalize the representations of highly similar input patterns. Even when they are optimized for linear neuronal dynamics they perform very well when the dynamics are nonlinear. These results provide insights into fundamental features of simplified inhibitory networks that may be relevant for pattern orthogonalization by neuronal circuits in general.











Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arevian, A. C., Kapoor, V., & Urban, N. N. (2008). Activitydependent gating of lateral inhibition in the mouse olfactory bulb. Nature Neuroscience, 11(1), 80–87.
Atick, J. J., & Redlich, A. N. (1993). Convergent algorithm for sensory receptive-field development. Neural Computation, 5(1), 45–60.
Barlow, H. B. (1989). Unsupervised learning. Neural Computation, 1, 295.
Barlow, H. (2001). Redundancy reduction revisited. Netw.-Comput. Neural Syst., 12(3), 241–253.
Bazhenov, M., Stopfer, M., Rabinovich, M., Huerta, R., Abarbanel, H. D. I., Sejnowski, T. J., et al. (2001). Model of transient oscillatory synchronization in the locust antennal lobe. Neuron, 30(2), 553–567.
Bell, A. J., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1997). The “independent components” of natural scenes are edge filters. Vision Research, 37(23), 3327–3338.
Bhandawat, V., Olsen, S. R., Gouwens, N. W., Schlief, M. L., & Wilson, R. I. (2007). Sensory processing in the drosophila antennal lobe increases reliability and separability of ensemble odor representations. Nature Neuroscience, 10(11), 1474–1482.
Cecchi, G. A., Petreanu, L. T., Alvarez-Buylla, A., & Magnasco, M. O. (2001). Unsupervised learning and adaptation in a model of adult neurogenesis. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 11(2), 175–182.
Cleland, T. A., & Sethupathy, P. (2006). Non-topographical contrast enhancement in the olfactory bulb. BMC Neuroscience, 7, 7.
Dimitrov, A., & Cowan, J. D. (1998). Spatial decorrelation in orientation-selective cortical cells. Neural Computation, 10(7), 1779–1795.
French, R. M. (1999). Catastrophic forgetting in connectionist networks. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(4), 128–135.
Friedrich, R. W., & Korsching, S. I. (1997). Combinatorial and chemotopic odorant coding in the zebrafish olfactory bulb visualized by optical imaging. Neuron, 18, 737.
Friedrich, R. W., & Laurent, G. (2001). Dynamic optimization of odor representations by slow temporal patterning of mitral cell activity. Science, 291, 889.
Friedrich, R. W., & Laurent, G. (2004). Dynamics of olfactory bulb input and output activity during odor stimulation in zebrafish. Journal of Neurophysiology, 91, 2658.
Friedrich, R. W., Habermann, C. J., & Laurent, G. (2004). Multiplexing using synchrony in the zebrafish olfactory bulb. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 862.
Gao, Y., & Strowbridge, B. B. (2008). Long-term potentiation of cortical feedback input to granule cells in the olfactory bulb. In Annual meeting of the society for neuroscience (pp. 434.22). Poster
Goodall, M. C. (1960). Performance of a stochastic net. Nature, 185(4712), 557–558.
Gutierrez-Galvez, A., & Gutierrez-Osuna, R. (2006). Increasing the separability of chemosensor array patterns with hebbian/anti-hebbian learning. Sensors and Actuators B, 116(1–2), 29–35.
Hertz, J., Krogh, A., & Palmer, R. G. (1991). Introduction to the theory of neural computation. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Jurs, P. C., Bakken, G. A., & McClelland, H. E. (2000). Computational methods for the analysis of chemical sensor array data from volatile analytes. Chemical Reviews, 100(7), 2649–2678.
Laurent, G. (1996). Dynamical representation of odors by oscillating and evolving neural assemblies. Trends in Neurosciences, 19(11), 489–496.
Laurent, G., Wehr, M., & Davidowitz, H. (1996). Temporal representations of odors in an olfactory network. Journal of Neuroscience, 16(12), 3837–3847.
Linster, C., Sachse, S., & Galizia, C. G. (2005). Computational modeling suggests that response properties rather than spatial position determine connectivity between olfactory glomeruli. Journal of Neurophysiology, 93(6), 3410–3417.
Linster, C., Johnson, B. A., Morse, A., Yue, E., & Leon, M., (2002). Spontaneous versus reinforced olfactory discriminations. Journal of Neuroscience, 22(16), 6842–6845.
Linster, C., Johnson, B. A., Yue, E., Morse, A., Xu, Z., Hingco, E., et al. (2001). Perceptual correlates of neural representations evoked by odorant enantiomers. Journal of Neuroscience, 21(24), 9837–9843
Lledo, P. M., Alonso, M., & Grubb, M. S. (2006). Adult neurogenesis and functional plasticity in neuronal circuits. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 7(3), 179–193.
Mazor, O., & Laurent, G. (2005). Transient dynamics versus fixed points in odor representations by locust antennal lobe projection neurons. Neuron, 48(4), 661–673.
Meister, M., & Berry, M. J. (1999). The neural code of the retina. Neuron, 22(3), 435–450.
Muezzinoglu, M. K., Huerta, R., Abarbanel, H. D. I., Ryan, M. A., & Rabinovich, M. I. (2009). Chemosensor-driven artificial antennal lobe transient dynamics enable fast recognition and working memory. Neural Computation, 21(4), 1018–1037.
Nadal, J. P., & Parga, N. (1994). Nonlinear neurons in the low-noise limit—a factorial code maximizes information-transfer. Netw.-Comput. Neural Syst., 5(4), 565–581.
Olshausen, B. A., & Field, D. J. (1996). Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images. Nature, 381(6583), 607–609.
Rodieck, R. W., & Stone, J. (1965). Response of cat retinal ganglion cells to moving visual patterns. Journal of Neurophysiology, 28(5), 819–832.
Satou, M., Anzai, S., & Huruno, M. (2005). Long-term potentiation and olfactory memory formation in the carp (cyprinus carpio l.) olfactory bulb. Compar, J., Physiol A, 191(5), 421–434.
Satou, M., Hoshikawa, R., Sato, Y., & Okawa, K. (2006). An in vitro study of long-term potentiation in the carp (cyprinus carpio l.) olfactory bulb. Compar, J., Physiol A, 192(2), 135–150.
Schmuker, M., & Schneider, G. (2007). Processing and classification of chemical data inspired by insect olfaction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(51), 20285–20289.
Soucy, E. R., Albeanu, D. F., Fantana, A. L., Murthy, V. N., & Meister, M. (2009). Precision and diversity in an odor map on the olfactory bulb. Nature Neuroscience, 12(2), 210–220.
Srivastava, V., Parker, D. J., & Edwards, S. F. (2008). The nervous system might ‘orthogonalize’ to discriminate. Journal on Theoretical Biology, 253(3), 514–517.
Stopfer, M., Jayaraman, V., & Laurent, G. (2003). Intensity versus identity coding in an olfactory system. Neuron, 39(6), 991–1004.
Tabor, R., & Friedrich, R. W. (2008). Pharmacological analysis of ionotropic glutamate receptor function in neuronal circuits of the zebrafish olfactory bulb. PLoS ONE, 3(1), e1416.
Yaksi, E., Judkewitz, B., & Friedrich, R. W. (2007). Topological reorganization of odor representations in the olfactory bulb. PLOS Biology, 5(7), e178.
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge stimulating discussions with T. Bozza, J. Cang, and S.A. Solla. HR gratefully acknowledges support by the Alexander-von-Humboldt Foundation, NIH (1F33DC8064-1), and NSF (DMS-9804673 and DMS-0719944). HR also expresses his appreciation for the hospitality of the Aspen Center for Physics, where the foundation for this research was laid. The research of RWF and MTW was supported by the Max-Planck-Society, the Novartis Research Foundation and by grants from the EU and the DFG.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Action Editor: C. Linster
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wick, S.D., Wiechert, M.T., Friedrich, R.W. et al. Pattern orthogonalization via channel decorrelation by adaptive networks. J Comput Neurosci 28, 29–45 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10827-009-0183-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10827-009-0183-1