Skip to main content
Log in

Soft Fault Diagnosis of Analog Circuits via Frequency Response Function Measurements

  • Published:
Journal of Electronic Testing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper provides a novel method for single and multiple soft fault diagnosis of analog circuits. The method is able to locate the faulty elements and evaluate their parameters. It employs the information contained in the frequency response function (FRF) measurements and focuses on finding models of the circuit under test (CUT) as exact as possible. Consequently, the method is capable of getting different sets of the parameters which are consistent with the diagnostic test, rather than only one specific set. To fulfil this purpose, the local plolynomial approach is applied and the associated normalized FRF is developed.The proposed method is especially suitable at the pre-production stage, where corrections of the technological design are important and the diagnostic time is not crucial. Two experimental examples are presented to clarify the proposed method and prove its efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aminian F, Aminian M, Collins H (2002) Analog fault diagnosis of actual circuits using neural networks. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 51(3):544–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bandler J, Salama A (1985) Fault diagnosis of analog circuits. Proc IEEE 73:1279–1325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bercher JF, Vignat C (2009) On minimum Fisher information distributions with restricted support and fixed variance. Inf Sci 179:3832–3842

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Butcher S, Sheppard J (2009) Distributional smoothing in bayesian fault diagnosis. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 58(2):342–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Flego SP, Plastino A, Plastino AR (2011) Fisher information, the Hellman-Feynman theorem, and the Jaynes reciprocity relations. Annals Phys 326:2533–2543

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Frieden BR (1998) Physics from Fisher information measure. Cambridge Univeresity Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Iuculano G, Nielsen L, Zanobini A, Pellegrini G (2007) The principle of maximum entropy applied in the evaluation of the measurement uncertainty. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 56(3):717–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Starzyk JA, Liu D, Liu Z-H, Nelson DE, Rutkowski JO (2004) Entropy-based optimum test points delection for analog fault dictionary techniques. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 53(3):754–761

  9. Kavithamani A, Manikandan V, Devarajan N (2012) Fault detection of analog circuits using network parameters. Int J Electron Test Theory Appl 28:257–261. Springer

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaminska B, Arabi K, Bell I, Goteti P, Huertas JL, Kin B, Rueda A, Soma M (1997) Analog and mixed-signal benchmark circuits - first release. Proc IEEE Int Test Conf:183–190

  11. Lataire J, Louarroudi E, Pintelon R (2012) Detecting a time-varying behavior in frequency response function measureemnts. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 61(8):2132–2143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li XF, Xie YL (2013) Analog circuits fault detection using cross-entropy approach. Int J Electron Test Theory Appl 29:115–120. Springer

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Papakostas D, Hatzopoulos A (1993) Correlation-based comparison of analog signatures for identification and fault diagnosis. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 42(4):860–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Papoulis A (1965) Probability, random variables and stochastic processes, ch.10. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pintelon R, Schoukens J, Vandersteen G, Barbe K (2010) Estimation of nonparametric noise and FRF models for multivariable systems-Part I: Theory. Mech Sys Signal Process 24(3):573–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Stefan V, Omar E, Colin T, Frank O (2011) Challenges for semiconductor test engineering: a review paper. JETTA 28(3):365–374. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stoica P, Selen R (2004) A review of information criterion rules. Signal Process Mag IEEE 21(4):36–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sindia S, Agrawal VD, Singh V (2012) Parametric fault testing of non-linear analog circuits based on polynomial and V-transform coefficients. Int J Electron Test Theory Appl 28:757–771. Springer

  19. Yang T, Yi H, Chun C, Guan Q (2008) A novel method for analog fault diagnosis based on neural netwoks and genetic algorithms. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 57(11):2631–2639

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 61371049), the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program)(Grant no. 2014CB744206), the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of High Education of China (Grant no. 20120185110013) and Sichuan Province Applied Basic Research Project (Grant no. 2013JY0058) for their support of this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yongle Xie.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: K. Saluja

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xie, Y., Li, X., Xie, S. et al. Soft Fault Diagnosis of Analog Circuits via Frequency Response Function Measurements. J Electron Test 30, 243–249 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10836-014-5445-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10836-014-5445-9

Keywords

Navigation