Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

CONWIP based control of a lamp assembly production line

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Efficient and effective production control systems are very important for manufacturing plants. CONWIP, one of these production control systems, has a high potential of becoming the best one available because it suits a variety of production environments and is easy to implement. In the following paper, we compare the single-loop and multi-loop CONWIP production control systems for an actual lamp assembly production line producing different kinds of products with discrete distribution processing time and demand. A model is formulated with respect to total cost and service level. A novel rule-based genetic algorithm (GA) approach is proposed for the multi-loop CONWIP system to find the optimum parameter setting. The results have shown that the single-loop CONWIP production control system is more efficient than the multi-loop system. It can greatly decrease the total cost and the WIP (Work-In-Process) with zero shortage probability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ayhan H., & Wortman M.A. (1999). Approximation for computing the throughput of closed assembly-type queueing networks. European Journal of Operational Research, 112(1): 107–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkley B.J. (1992). A review of the kanban production control research literature. Production and Operations Management, 1(3): 393–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonvik A.M., Couch C.E., & Gershwin S.B. (1997). Comparison of production-line control mechanisms. International Journal of Production Research, 35: 789–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonvik A.M., Dallery Y., & Gershwin S.B. (2000). Approximate analysis of production systems operated by a CONWIP/finite buffer hybrid control policy. International Journal of Production Research, 38: 2845–2869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang T.M., & Yih Y. (1994). Generic kanban systems for dynamic environments. International Journal of Production Research, 32: 889–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dallery, Y., & Liberopoulos, G. (1995). A new Kanban-type pull control mechanism for multi-stage manufacturing systems. Proceedings of the 3rd European Control Conference, Rome, September 5–8, 4(2), 3543–3548

  • Di Mascolo M., Frein Y., & Dalley Y. (1996). An analytical method for performance evaluation of kanban controlled production systems. Operations Research, 44: 50–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Duenyas I. (1994). Estimating the throughput of a cyclic assembly system. International Journal of Production Research, 32(6):1403–1419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duenyas I., & Hopp W.J. (1992a). Estimating the throughput of an exponential CONWIP Assembly system. Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, 14: 135–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duenyas I., & Hopp W.J. (1992b). CONWIP assembly with deterministic process and random outages. IIE Transactions, 24(3): 97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duenyas I., Hopp W.J., & Spearman M.L. (1993). Characterizing the output process of a CONWIP line with deterministic processing and random outages. Management Science, 39(6): 975–988

    Google Scholar 

  • Duri C., Frein Y., & Lee H.-S. (2000). Performance evaluation and design of a CONWIP system with inspections. International Journal of Production Economics, 64(1): 219–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ettl, M., & Schwehm, M. (1994). A design methodology for Kanban-controlled production lines using queueing networks and genetic algorithms. Proceedings of tenth international conference on systems engineering, ICSE‘94 in Coventry, UK, Coventry University Press, pp. 307–314.

  • Gen M., & Cheng R. (1996). Genetic algorithms and engineering design. New York: John Wiley & Son Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Golany B., Dar-El E. M., & Zeev N. (1999). Controlling shop floor operations in a multi-family, multi-cell manufacturing environment through constant work-in-process. IIE Transactions, 31(8): 771–781

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg D.E. (1989). Genetic algorithm in search, optimization & Machine learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley

    Google Scholar 

  • Gstettner S., & Kuhn H. (1996). Analysis of production control systems kanban and CONWIP. International Journal of Production Research, 34: 3253–3273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall W.R. (1981). Driving the productivity machine: production planning and control in Japan. Falls Church, Virginia: American Production and Inventory Control Society

    Google Scholar 

  • Herer Y.T., & Masin M. (1997). Mathematical programming formulation of CONWIP based production lines; and relationships to MRP. International Journal of Production Research, 35(4): 1067–1076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland J.H. (1975). Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopp W.J., & Roof M.L. (1998). Setting WIP levels with statistical throughput control (STC) in CONWIP production lines. International Journal of Production Research, 36: 867–882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopp W.J., & Spearman M.L. (1991). Throughput of a constant work in process manufacturing line subject to failures. International Journal of Production Research, 29(3): 635–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopp W.J., & Spearman M.L. (1996). Factory physics: Foundations of manufacturing management. Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang C.-C., & Kusiak A. (1996). Overview of Kanban system. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 9: 169–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang M., Wang D., & Ip W.H. (1998). Simulation and comparative study of the CONWIP, kanban and MRP production control systems in a cold rolling plant. Production Planning and Control, 9: 803–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura O., & Terada H. (1981). Design and analysis of push system, a method of multi-stage production controls. International Journal of Production Research, 19: 26–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee Ch.-E., & Chen Ch.-W. (1997). Dispatching scheme involving move control and weighted due date for wafer foundries. IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing Technology Part C: Manufacturing, 20(4): 268–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luh P.B., Zhou X., & Tomastik R.N. (2000). Effective method to reduce inventory in job shops. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 16(4): 420–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalewicz Z. (1996). Genetic algorithms + data structure = evolution programs (thirded). New York: Springer-Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Muckstadt J.A., & Tayur S.R. (1995a). Comparison of alternative kanban control mechanisms. I. Background and structural results. IIE Transactions, 27: 140–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muckstadt J.A., & Tayur S.R. (1995b). Comparison of alternative kanban control mechanisms II Experimental results. IIE Transactions, 27: 151–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostermark R. (1999). Solving a nonlinear non-convex trim loss problem with a genetic hybrid algorithm. Computers & Operations Research, 26(6): 623–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price W., Gravel M., & Nsakanda A.L. (1994). A review of optimization models of kanban-based production systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 75: 1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roderick L.M., Toland J., & Rodriguez P. (1994). A simulation studies of CONWIP versus MRP at Westinghouse. Computer Industrial Engineering, 26: 237–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spearman M.L. (1992). Customer service in pull production systems. Operations Research, 40: 948–958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spearman M.L., Woodruff D.L., & Hopp W.J. (1990). CONWIP: A pull alternative to kanban. International Journal of Production Research, 28: 879–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spearman M.L., & Zazanis M.A. (1992). Push and pull production systems: Issue and comparison. Operations Research, 40: 521–532

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugimori Y., Kusunoki K., Cho F., & Uchikawa S. (1977). Toyota production system and kanban system materialization of just-in-time and respect-for-human system. International Journal of Production Research, 15: 553–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh K., Zhou M.C., Kaighobadi M., & Caudill R. (1996). A petri net approach to investigating push and pull paradigms in flexible factory automated systems. International Journal of Production Research, 34, 595–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min Huang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ip, W.H., Huang, M., Yung, K.L. et al. CONWIP based control of a lamp assembly production line. J Intell Manuf 18, 261–271 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-007-0021-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-007-0021-0

Keywords

Navigation