Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-criteria decision making for assembly line balancing

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Assembly line balancing often has significant impact on performance of manufacturing systems, and is usually a multiple-objective problem. Neither an algorithmic nor a procedural assembly line balancing methodology is usually effective in solving these problems. This article proposes a data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach to solve an assembly line balancing problem. A computer-aided assembly line balancing tool as Flexible Line Balancing software is used to generate a considerable number of solutions alternatives as well as to generate quantitative decision-making unit outputs. The quantitative performance measures were considered in this article. Then DEA was used to solve the multiple-objective assembly line balancing problem. An illustrative example shows the effectiveness of the proposed methodology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arcus A. L. (1966) COMSOAL: a computer method of sequencing operations for assembly lines. International Journal of Production Research 30: 259–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Banker R.D., Charnes A., Cooper W.W. (1984) Some models for the estimation of technical and scale inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science 30: 1078–1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker C., Scholl A. (2006) A survey on problems and methods in generalized assembly line balancing. European Journal of Operational Research 168(3): 694–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baybars I. (1986) A survey of exact algorithms for the simple assembly line balancing problem. Management Science 32: 909–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boysen N., Fliedner M., Scholl A. (2007) A classification of assembly line balancing problems. European Journal of Operational Research 183(2): 674–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Rhodes E. (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2: 429–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dar-El E.M. (1975) Solving large single-model assembly line balancing problems—A comparative study. AIIE Transactions 7: 302–310

    Google Scholar 

  • DePuy G.W., Whitehouse G.E. (2000) Applying the COMSOAL computer heuristic to the constrained resource allocation problem. Computers & Industrial Engineering 38: 413–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolgui A., Guschinsky N., Levin G., Proth J.M. (2008) Optimisation of multi-position machines and transfer lines. European Journal of Operational Research 185(3): 1375–1389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll J., Thilakawardana D. (2001) The definition of assembly line balancing difficulty and evaluation of balance solution quality. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing 17: S81–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erel E., Sarin S.C. (1998) A survey of the assembly line balancing procedures. Production Planning and Control 9: 414–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R., Knox Lovell C.A. (1978) Measuring the technical efficiency of production. Journal of Economic Theory 19(1): 150–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flexible Line Balancing software (FLB) (2001). Production Technology Engineering and Management Services, Tampa, FL: LG Electronics Inc.

  • Gokcen H., Agpak K., Benzer R. (2006) Balancing of parallel assembly lines. International Journal of Production Economics 103: 600–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kildbridge M.D., Wester L. (1961) A Heuristic method of assembly line balancing. Journal of Industrial Engineering 12(4): 292–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein R., Scholl A. (1999) Computing lower bounds by destructive improvement—An application to resource-constrained project scheduling. European Journal of Operational Research 112: 322–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lapierre S.D., Ruiz A., Soriano P. (2006) Balancing assembly lines with Tabu search. European Journal of Operational Research 168(3): 826–837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMullen P.R., Frazier G.V. (1998) Using simulation and data envelopment analysis to compare assembly line balancing solutions. Journal of Productivity Analysis 11: 149–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moodie C.L., Young H.H. (1965) A heuristic method of assembly line balancing for assumptions of constant or variable work element times. Journal of Industrial Engineering 16: 23–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Osman, R., & Shing, O. N. (1986). Assembly line conference proceedings. Computers Industrial Engineering, 94–99.

  • Rekiek B., Doigui A., Delchambre A., Bratcu A. (2002) State of art of optimization methods for assembly line design. Annual Reviews in Control 26: 163–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacerdoti E. (1977) A structure for plans and behavior. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholl A. (1999) Balancing and sequencing assembly lines (2nd ed). Physica, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholl A., Becker C. (2006) State-of-the-art exact and heuristic solution procedures for simple assembly line balancing. European Journal of Operational Research 168(3): 666–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Jahangoshai Rezaee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jolai, F., Jahangoshai Rezaee, M. & Vazifeh, A. Multi-criteria decision making for assembly line balancing. J Intell Manuf 20, 113–121 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-008-0107-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-008-0107-3

Keywords

Navigation