Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Decision making process: typology, intelligence, and optimization

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Decision making is concerned with evaluating and/or ranking possible alternatives of action. In this paper, we develop a model for the process of decision making. Understanding the decision process can provide insights into how humans make decisions, understand their decision making approaches, and how they differ from each other. We believe that decision makers who are conscious of their decision process types can make more effective and balanced decisions. In this paper, we present a new decision process model based on the following four dimensions where each dimension is defined by two opposing types: Information Processing (Concrete and Abstract), Alternative Generation (Adaptive and Constructive), Alternative Evaluation (Moderate and Bold), and Decision Closure (Organized and Flexible). Furthermore, an approach for assessing each of the four decision process types by a mathematical function is presented. In a much boarder scope than decision making, these assessed functions can be used to evaluate and rank alternatives. The decision process model can also be used in conjunction with multiple criteria decision making and multiple objective optimization. The model can also be used to explain the reasons that the classical decision making models fail to describe real decision makers’ behavior, and mistakenly label such behavior as irrational. The proposed decision process model can be used for developing new behavioral, rational, and intelligent decision making theories and approaches. Extensions of this work may include group decision making, organizational decision making, team formation, and risk behavior analysis. Experimental results of over four hundred engineering students are reported. A web site has been developed for users (http://car.cwru.edu/decision/).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams J. (1995) Risk. UCL Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansell, J., Wharton, F. (eds) (1992) Risk analysis, assessment and management. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow K. J. (1971) Essays on the theory of risk-bearing. Markham Publishing Company, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Azuma, R., Daily. M., & Furmanski. C. (2006). A review of time critical decision making models and human cognitive processes. In Aerospace Conference 2006 IEEE, March 2006, pp. 4–11.

  • Bell D. E. (1983) Risk premiums for decision regret. Management Science 29(10): 1156–1166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergquist, W. H., Phillips, S. R. (eds) (1975) A handbook for faculty development, Vol. 1. Council for the Advancement of Small Colleges, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Betsch C., Kunz J. J. (2008) Individual strategy preferences and decisional fit. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 21: 532–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böhm G., Brun W. (2008) Intuition and affect in risk perception and decision making. Judgment and Decision Making 3(1): 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan F. T. S., Chung S. H., Choy K. L. (2006) Optimization of order fulfillment in distribution network problems. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 17: 307–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekaran, B. (2007). Multi-criterial decision-making and the cognitive architecture of problem solving. In Computational Intelligence in Multicriteria Decision Making, IEEE Symposium on, No. 1–5, Apr 2007, pp. 235–235.

  • Cloninger C. R. et al. (1991) The tridimensional personality questionnaire: U.S. normative data. Psychological Reports 69: 1047–1057

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloninger C. R. (1994) Temperament and personality. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 4(2): 266–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dagdeviren M. (2008) Decision making in equipment selection: An integrated approach with AHP and PROMETHEE. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 19(4): 397–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endsley M. R., Hoffman R., Kaber D., Roth E. (2007) Cognitive engineering and decision making: An overview and future course. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making 1(1): 1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felder R., Soloman M., & Barbara A. (2000). “Learning styles and strategies.” Online article. http://www.crc4mse.org/ILS/ILS_explained.html, 2000, Dec 15

  • Ferrari J. R., Dovidio J. F. (2000) Examining behavioral processes in indecision: Decisional procrastination and decision-making style. Journal of Research in Personality 34: 127–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman M., Savage L. J. (1948) The utility analysis of choices involving risk. Journal of Political Economy 56(4): 279–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galotti K. M. (2001) Helps and hindrances for adolescents making important real-life decisions. Applied Developmental Psychology 22: 275–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollier C., Lindsey J., Zeckhauser R. J. (1997) Investment flexibility and the acceptance of risk. Journal of Economic Theory 76: 219–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guang Y., Zhong Z. W., Ding Z (2004) Optimization of tool change timing in a nut forming process using genetic algorithms. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 15(5): 693–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes S.N., O’Brien W.H. (2007) Principles and practice of behavioral assessment, 1st edn. Springer, Berline

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull R. F. C., Baynes H. G. (1990) Psychological types: C.G. Jung, 9th Edn. Princeton University Press, Kluwer/Plenum Academic Publishers, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D., Tversky A. (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2): 263–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaneko M., Suzuki N. (2001) Bounded interpersonal inferences and decision making. Economic Theory 19: 63–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney R.L., Raiffa H. (1993) Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Keirsey D. (1998) Please understand me II: Temperament, character, intelligence. Del Mar, CA, Prometheus Nemesis

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim C. N., Yang K. H., Kim J. (2008) Human decision-making behavior and modeling effects. Decision Support Systems 45(3): 517–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb D. (1984) Eperiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeger O., & Thuesen J. M. (2002). Type talk at work: How the 16 personality types determine your success on the job. Delta; Revised edition, July 30, 2002.

  • Kull T. J., Talluri S. (2008) A supply risk reduction model using integrated multicriteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 55(3): 409–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard N. H., Scholl R. W., Kowalski K. B. (1999) Information processing style and decision making. Journal of Organizational Behavior 20: 407–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loo R. (2000) A psychometric evaluation of the general decision-making style Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences 29: 895–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopes L. L. (1997) Between hope and fear: The psychology of risk. In: Goldstein W. M., Hogarth R. M. (eds) Research of judgement and decision making. Cambridge Press, New York, pp 681–717

    Google Scholar 

  • Maggini C., Ampollini P., Marchesi C., Gariboldi S., Cloninger C. R. (2000) Relationships between tridimensional personality questionnaire dimensions and DSM-III-R personality traits in Italian adolescents. Comprehensive Psychiatry 41(6): 426–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malakooti B., Zhou Y. (1994) An adaptive feedforward artificial neural network with application to multiple criteria decision making. Management Science 40(11): 1542–1561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malakooti B., Zhou Y., Tandler E. C. (1995) In-process regressions and adaptive neural networks for monitoring and Supervising machining operations. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 6: 53–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malakooti B., Raman V. (2000a) An interactive multi-objective artificial neural network approach for machine setup optimization. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 11(1): 41–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malakooti B., Raman V. (2000b) Clustering and selection of multiple criteria alternatives using unsupervised and supervised neural networks. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 11(5): 435–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland D. (1961) The achieving society. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller C. C. (2008) Decisional comprehensiveness and firm performance: Towards a more complete understanding. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 21: 598–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, I. (1962). The Myers-briggs type indicator, 1962.

  • Neumann, J. V., & Morgenstern, O. (2007). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 60 Anv. edn, Mar 19, 2007.

  • Parker A. M., Fischhoff B. (2005) Decision-making competence: External validation through an Individual-differences Approach. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 18: 1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power D.J., Sharda R. (2007) Model-driven decision support systems: Concepts and research directions. Decision Support Systems, Integrated Decision Support 43(3): 1044–1061

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt J.W. (1964) Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica 32(1/2): 122–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raiffa H. (1968) Decision analysis: Introductory lectures on choice under uncertainty. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva F. (1993) Psychometric foundations and behavioral assessment. Sage Publications Inc., Newbury Park, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith C.W. Jr. (1995) Corporate risk management: Theory and practice. Journal of Derivatives 2: 21–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith M. (1999) Gender, cognitive style, personality and management decision making. Management Accounting 7(77): 18–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamura H. (2005) Behavioral models for complex decision analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 166(3): 655–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, J., Wang, X., Kaku, I., & Yung, K.-l. (2009). Optimization of parts scheduling in multiple cells considering intercell move using scatter search approach. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. doi:10.1007/s10845-008-0236-8.

  • Tchangani A. P. (2004) Decision-making with uncertain data: Bayesian linear programming approach. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 15: 17–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsaousis I. (1999) The traits personality questionnaire (TPQue): A Greek measure for the five factor model. Personality and Individual Differences 26: 271–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky A., Kahneman D. (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211: 453–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. The Journal of Business, 59, No. 4, Part 2: The Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory, S251–S278.

  • Zeelenberg M. (1999) Anticipated regret, expected feedback and behavioral decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 12: 93–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q., Chen J. C. H., Chong P. P. (2004) Decision consolidation: Criteria weight determination using multiple preference formats. Decision Support Systems 38(2): 247–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Systems Engineering, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA

    Behnam Malakooti

Authors
  1. Behnam Malakooti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Behnam Malakooti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Malakooti, B. Decision making process: typology, intelligence, and optimization. J Intell Manuf 23, 733–746 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-010-0424-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-010-0424-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation