Abstract
Consumer preferences and information on product choice behavior can be of significant value in the development processes of innovative products. In this paper, product customization evaluation and selection model is introduced to support imprecision inherent of qualitative inputs from customers and designers in the decision making process. Focusing on customer utility generation, an optimum design selection approach based on fuzzy set decision-making is proposed, where design attributes priority is identified from customer preferences using an analytical hierarchy process. A multi-attribute analysis diagram is developed to visualize the preference of each attribute from the expert’s group decision. Conjoint analysis is used in the product customization to focus on customer utility generation in terms of multiple criteria. The use of the decision-making method is illustrated with a case example that highlights the utility of the proposed method.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albayrak E., Erensal Y. C. (2004) Using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to improve human performance: An application of multiple criteria decision making problem. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 15: 491–503
Ayag Z. (2005) A fuzzy AHP-based simulation approach to concept evaluation in a NPD environment. IIE Transactions 37(9): 827–842
Besharati B., Azarm S., Kannan P. (2006) A decision support system for product design selection: A generalized purchase modeling approach. Decision Support Systems 42(1): 333–350
Büyüközkan G., Feyziǒlu O., Ruan D. (2007) Fuzzy group decision-making to multiple preference formats in quality function deployment. Computers in Industry 58(5): 392–402
Chen C., Khoo L., Yan W. (2005) PDCS-a product definition and customisation system for product concept development. Expert Systems with Applications 28(3): 591–602
Chen S. (1985) Ranking fuzzy numbers with maximizing set and minimizing set. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 17(2): 113–129
Chiang D., Guo R., Pai F. (2008) Improved customer satisfaction with a hybrid dispatching rule in semiconductor back-end factories. International Journal of Production Research 46(17): 4903–4923
Farquhar P. (1977) A survey of multiattribute utility theory and applications. TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences 6: 59–89
Green P., Srinivasan V. (1978) Conjoint analysis in consumer research: issues and outlook. Journal of consumer research 5(2): 103–123
Jiao J., Tseng M. (1998) Fuzzy ranking for concept evaluation in configuration design for mass customization. Concurrent Engineering 6(3): 189–206
Kwong C. K., Bai H. (2002) A fuzzy AHP approach to the determination of importance weights of customer requirements in quality function deployment. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 13: 367–377
Louviere J., Hensher D., Swait J. (2000) Stated choice methods: analysis and applications. Cambridge University Press
Liu, C., Ramirez-Serrano, A., & Yin, G. F. (2009). Customer-driven product design and evaluation method for collaborative design environments. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. doi:10.1007/s10845-009-0334-2.
Saaty T. L. (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York
Shao X. Y., Wang Z. H., Li P. G., Feng X. J. (2006) Integrating data mining and rough set for customer group-based discovery of product configuration rules. International Journal of Production Research 44(14): 2789–2811
Thurston D., Crawford C. (1994) A method for integrating end-user preferences for design evaluation in rule-based systems. Journal of Mechanical Design 116(2): 522–530
Tsai H., Hsiao S. (2004) Evaluation of alternatives for product customization using fuzzy logic. Information Sciences 158: 233–262
Vanegas L., Labib A. (2005) Fuzzy approaches to evaluation in engineering design. Journal of mechanical design 127(1): 24–33
Xu L., Li Z., Li S., Tang F. (2007) A decision support system for product design in concurrent engineering. Decision Support Systems 42(4): 2029–2042
Zadeh L. (1965) Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8: 338–353
Zha X., Sriram R., Lu W. (2005) Evaluation and selection in product design for mass customization: A knowledge decision support approach. AI EDAM 18(01): 87–109
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, C., Ramirez-Serrano, A. & Yin, G. An optimum design selection approach for product customization development. J Intell Manuf 23, 1433–1443 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-010-0473-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-010-0473-5