Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Process planning optimization for parallel drilling of blind holes using a two phase genetic algorithm

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Determining the optimal process parameters and machining sequence is essential in machining process planning since they significantly affect the cost, productivity, and quality of machining operations. Process planning optimization has been widely investigated in single-tool machining operations. However, for the research reported in process planning optimization of machining operations using multiple tools simultaneously, the literature is scarce. In this paper, a novel two phase genetic algorithm (GA) is proposed to optimize, in terms of minimum completion time, the process parameters and machining sequence for two-tool parallel drilling operations with multiple blind holes distributed in a pair of parallel faces and in multiple pairs of parallel faces. In the first phase, a GA is used to determine the process parameters (i.e., drill feed and spindle speed) and machining time for each hole subject to feed, spindle speed, thrust force, torque, power, and tool life constraints. The minimum machining time is the optimization criterion. In the second phase, the GA is used to determine the machining sequence subject to hole position constraints (i.e., the distribution of the hole locations on each face is fixed). The minimum operation completion time is the optimization criterion in this phase. Simulation results are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm in solving the process planning optimization problem for parallel drilling of blind holes on multiple parallel faces. In order to evaluate the performance of proposed algorithm, the simulation results are compared to a methodology that utilizes the exhaustive method in the first phase and a sorting algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agapiou J. S. (1992) The optimization of machining operations based on a combined criterion, part 1: The use of combined objectives in single pass operations. ASME Journal Engineering for Industry 114(4): 500–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen M. C., Tsai D. M. (1996) A simulated annealing approach for optimization of multi-pass turning operations. International Journal of Production Research 34(10): 2803–2825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg D. E. (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing, Inc, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopalakrishnan, G., & Kota, S. (1998). A parallely actuated work support module for reconfigurable machining systems. In ASME design engineering technical conference, Atlanta, Georgia, September 13–16.

  • Gopalakrishnan V., Fedewa D., Mehrabi M. G., Kota S., Orlandea N. (2002) Parallel structures and their applications in reconfigurable machining systems. ASME Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering 124(2): 483–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ihsan S. A., Adil B., Turkay D., Huseyin F. I. (1999) Dynamic optimization of multipass milling operations via geometric programming. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacturing 39(2): 297–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kachitvichyanukul V., Sitthitham S. (2011) A two-stage genetic algorithm for multi-objective job shop scheduling problems. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 22(3): 355–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koren Y., Heisel U., Jovane F., Moriwoki T., Pritschow G., Ulosy A. G., Brussel H. (1999) Reconfigurable manufacturing systems. CIRP Annals 48(2): 1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutz, M. (2006). Mechanical engineers’ handbook, manufacturing and management, Book 3, New York: Wiley.

  • Levin J., Dutta D. (1992) Computer-aided process planning for parallel machines. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 11(2): 79–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li S. J., Li Y., Hong W. (2000) Study of multi-process tolerance synthetic optimization. Journal of Xi’an University of Technology 16(1): 88–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Li S. J., Li Y., Liu Y. (2007) A GA-based NN approach for makespan estimation. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computation 185(2): 1003–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabi M. G., Ulsoy A. G., Koren Y. (2000) Reconfigurable manufacturing systems: Key to future manufacturing. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 11(4): 403–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabi M. G., Ulsoy A. G., Koren Y., Heytler P. (2002) Trends and perspectives in flexible and reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 13(2): 135–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon Y., Kota S. (1998) Generalized kinematic modeling method of reconfigurable machine tools. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design 124(1): 47–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salehi M., Bahreininejad A. (2011) Optimization process planning using hybrid genetic algorithm and intelligent search for job shop machining. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 22(4): 643–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su C. T., Chen M. C. (1999) Computer-aided optimization of multi-pass turning operations for continuous forms on CNC Lathes. IIE Transactions 31(7): 583–596

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang L., Landers R. G., Balakrishnan S. N. (2008) Parallel turning process parameter optimization based on a novel heuristic approach. ASME Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering 130(3): 031002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tandon V., El-Mounayri H., Kishawy H. (2002) NC end milling optimization using evolutionary computation. International Journal Machine Tools and Manufacturing 42(5): 595–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, L. W., Walsh, G. C., & Stamper, R. E. (1996). Kinematics of a novel three DOF translational platform. In IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (Vol. 4, pp. 3446–3451). Minneapolis, Minnesota, April 22–28.

  • Wang X. J., Da Z., Balaji A. K., Jawahir I. S. (2002) Performance-based optimal selection of cutting conditions and cutting tools in multipass turning operations using genetic algorithms. International Journal of Production Research 40(9): 2053–2065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wick, D. (1983). Tool and manufacturing engineers handbook (Vol. 1). Dearborn, Michigan: Machining, SME.

  • Wilson F. W. (1963) Manufacturing Planning and estimating handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Yip-Hoi D., Dutta D. (1995) Data extraction from geometric models for process planning for parallel machines. Journal of Manufacturing System 14(5): 307–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert G. Landers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, S., Liu, Y., Li, Y. et al. Process planning optimization for parallel drilling of blind holes using a two phase genetic algorithm. J Intell Manuf 24, 791–804 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-012-0628-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-012-0628-7

Keywords

Navigation