Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Generalized cell formation: iterative versus simultaneous resolution with grouping genetic algorithm

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For each industrial, lean manufacturing is “The method” to improve productivity and reduce cost. One of the tools for lean is cellular manufacturing. This technique reduces the factory to several small entities which are easier to manage. The algorithm proposed in this paper is based on a simultaneous resolution of two interdependent problems. These two problems emerge when the flexibility is used during the production process. This paper proves the efficiency of the simultaneous resolution comparing to the sequential resolution with iterations. To compare only the resolution method, a unique grouping genetic algorithm is adapted to be used in both cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. PFA provides well-established, efficient and analytical engineering method for planning the change from process organization to product organization.

  2. The reviews of Mansouri et al. (2000) and Defersha and Chen (2006) incorporate a wider range of input data and cell formation criteria.

  3. The complete case can available by email.

References

  • Adenso-Diaz, B., Lozano, S., Racero, J., & Guerrero, F. (2001). Machine cell formation in generalized group technology. Computers & Operations Research, 41(2), 227–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akturk, M., & Turkcan, A. (2000). Cellular manufacturing system design using a holonistic approach. International Journal of Production Research, 38(1), 2327–2347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Askin, R., Selim, H., & Vakharia, A. (1997). A methodology for designing flexible cellular manufacturing systems. IIE Transactions, 29(7), 599–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baykasoglu, A., & Gindy, N. (2000). Mocacef 1.0: Multiple objective capability based approach to form part-machine groups for cellular manufacturing application. International Journal of Production Research, 38(5), 1133–1161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baykasoglu, A., Gindy, N., & Cobb, R. (2001). Capability based formulation and solution of multiple objective cell formation problems using simulated annealing. Integrated Manufacturing System, 12, 258–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjaafar, S., & Ramakrishnan, R. (1996). Measurement and evaluation of sequencing flexibility in manufacturing systems. International Journal of Production Research, 34, 1195–1220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caux, C., Bruniaux, R., & Pierreval, H. (2000). Cell formation with alternative process plans and machine capacity constraints: A new combined approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 64(1–3), 279–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekharan, M., & Rajagopalan, R. (1986). An ideal seed non-hierarchical clustering algorithm for cellular manufacturing. International Journal of Production Research, 24(2), 451– 464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., & Heragu, S. (1999). Stepwise decomposition approaches for large scale cell formation problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 113, 64–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choobineh, F. (1988). A framework for the design of cellular manufacturing systems. International Journal of Production Research, 26(7), 1161–1172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Defersha, F., & Chen, M. (2006). A comprehensive mathematical model for the design of the cellular manufacturing systems. International Journal of Production Economics, 103, 767–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diallo, M., Pierreval, H., & Quilliot, A. (2001). Manufacturing cells design with flexible routing capability in presence of unreliable machines. International Journal of Production Economics, 74(1), 175–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falkenauer, E. (1998). Genetic algorithms for grouping problem. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goncalves, J., & Resende, M. (2002). A hybrid genetic algorithm for manufacturing cell formation. Tech. rep., Rapport.

  • Gravel, M., Nsakanda, A., & Price, W. (1998). Efficient solutions to the cell-formation problem with multiple routings via a double-loop genetic algorithm. European Journal of Operational Research, 109, 286–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, T. (1993). Design of manufacturing cells for flexible environment considering alternative routeing. International Journal of Production Research, 31, 1259–1273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heragu, S., & Chen, J. (1998). Optimal solution of cellular manufacturing system design: Benders’ decomposition approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 107, 175–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. (1975). Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Yasuda, K. (2006). Application of genetic algorithm for bin packing. International Journal of Production Research, 44(11) 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, H., & Ree, P. (1996). Routes selection for the cell formation problem with alternative part process plans. Computers & Operations Research, 30(3), 423–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayaswal, S., & Adil, G. (2004). An efficient algorithm for cell formation with sequence data, machine replications and alternative process routings. International Journal of Production Research, 42(12), 2419–2433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeon, G., & Leep, H. (2006). Forming part families by using genetic algorithm and designing machine cells under demand changes. Computers & Operations Research, 33(1), 263–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joines, J., Culbreth, C., & King, R. (1996a). Manufacturing cell design: An integer programming model employing genetic algorithms. IEE Transactions, 28, 69–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joines, J., King, R., & Culbreth, C. (1996b). A comprehensive review of production-orien manufacturing cell formation techniques. International Journal of Factory Automation and Information Management, 3(3–4), 225–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, S., & Wemmerlov, U. (1993a). A work load-oriented heuristic methodology for manufacturing cell formation allowing reallocation of operations. European Journal of Operational Research, 69, 292–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, S., & Wemmerlov, U. (1993b). A work load-oriented heuristic methodology for manufacturing cell formation allowing reallocation of operations. European Journal of Operational Research, 69(3), 292–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazerooni, M., Luong, H., & Abhary, K. (1997). A genetic algorithm based cell design considering alternative routing. Computer-Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 10(2), 93–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kima, Y., Park, K., & Ko, J. (2003). A symbiotic evolutionary algorithm for the integration of process planning and job shop scheduling. Computers & Operations Research, 30, 1151–1171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusiak, A. (1987). The generalized group technology concept. International Journal of Production Research, 25, 561–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusiak, A., & Cho, M. (1992). Similarity coefficient algorithm for solving the group technology problem. International Journal of Production Research, 30(11), 2633–2646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C., Lei, L., & Pinedo, M. (1997). Current trends in deterministic scheduling. Annals of Operations Research, 70, 1–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Y., & Solberg, J. (1991). Effectiveness of flexible routing control. The International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, 3, 189–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logendran, R., Ramakrishna, P., & Srikandarajah, C. (1994). Tabu search-based heuristics for cellular manufacturing systems in the presence of alternative process plans. European Journal of Operational Research, 32(2), 273–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lozano, S., Guerrero, F., Eguia, I., & Onieva, L. (1999). Cell design and loading in the presence of alternative routing. International Journal of Operational Research, 37(14), 3289–3304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahdavi, I., Rezaeian, J., Shanker, K., & Amari, Z. (2006). A set partitioning based heuristic procedure for incremental cell formation with routing flexibility. International Journal of Production Research, 44(24), 5343–5361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahesh, O., & Srinivasan, G. (2002). Incremental cell formation considering alternative machines. International Journal of Operational Research, 40(14), 3291–3310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansouri, S., Moattar-Husseini, S., & Newman, S. (2000). A review of the modern approaches to multi-criteria cell design. International Journal of Production Research, 38(5), 1201–1218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohamed, Z. (1996). A flexible approach to (re)configure flexible manufacturing cells. European Journal of Operational Research, 95, 566–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, C., & Gen, M. (1999). A genetic algorithm-based approach for design of independent manufacturing cells. International Journal of Production Economics, 20(60–1), 421–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mungwattana, A. (2000). Design of cellular manufacturing systems for dynamic and uncertain production requirements with presence of routing flexibility. Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.

  • Nagi, R., Harhalakis, G., & Proth, J. (1990). Multiple routings and capacity considerations in group technology applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 28(12), 2243–2257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nsakanda, A., Diaby, M., & Price, W. (2006). Hybrid genetic approach for solving large-scale capacitated cell formation problems with multiple routings. European Journal of Operational Research, 171(3), 1051–1070.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajamani, D., Singh, N., & Aneja, Y. (1992). Selection of parts and machines for cellularization: A mathematical programming approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 62(1), 47–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramabhatta, V., & Nagi, R. (1998). An integrated formulation of manufacturing cell formation with capacity planning and multiple routings. Annals of Operations Research, 77, 79–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sankaran, S., & Kasilingam, G. (1990). An integrated approach to cell formation and part routing in group technology manufacturing systems. Engineering Optimization, 16, 235–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sofianopoulou, S. (1999). Manufacturing cells design with alternative process plans and/or replicate machines. International Journal of Production Research, 37(3), 707–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solimanpur, M., Vrat, P., & Shankar, R. (2004). A multi-objective genetic algorithm approach to the design of cellular manufacturing systems. International Journal of Production Research, 42(7), 1419–1441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stawowy, A. (2006). Evolutionary strategy for manufacturing cell design. OMEGA. The International Journal of Management Science, 34(1), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suresh, N., & Slomp, J. (2001). A multi-objective procedure for labor assignments and grouping in capacitated cell formation problems. International Journal of Production Research, 39(18), 4103–4131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uddin, M., & Shanker, K. (2002). Grouping of parts and machines in presence of alternative process routes by genetic algorithm. International Journal of Production Economics, 76(3), 219–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vin, E. (2010). Genetic algorithms applied to generalized cell formation problem. Ph.D. thesis, Ecole Polytechnique de Bruxelles, Universit Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium.

  • Vin, E., DeLit, P., & Delchambre, A. (2003). Une approche intgre pour rsoudre le problme de formation des cellules de production avec des routages alternatifs. In MOSIM03 world symposium, April 23–25, 2003, France.

  • Vin, E., Francq, P., & Delchambre, A. (2006). A grouping genetic algorithm (simoggas) simultaneously to solve two grouping problems applied to the cell formation problem with alternative process plans. In Group technology/cellular manufacturing (GTCM06).

  • Vivekanand, P., & Narendran, T. (1998). Logical cell formation in fms, using flexibility-base criteria. International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, 10, 163–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Won, Y. (2000). New p-median approach to cell formation with alternative process plans. International Journal of Production Research, 38(1), 229–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, T., Chen, J., & Yeh, J. (2004). A decomposition approach to the cell formation problem with alternative process plans. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 24(11/12), 834–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, T., Chung, S., & Chang, C. (2009). Hybrid simulated annealing algorithm with mutation operator to the cell formation problem with alternative process routing. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 3652–3661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, Y., & Yasuda, K. (2002). Manufacturing cells’ design in consideration of various production factors. International Journal of Production Research, 40(4), 885–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, C., & Wu, Z. (2000). A genetic algorithm for manufacturing cell formation with multiple routes and multiple objectives. International Journal of Production Research, 38(2), 385–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emmanuelle Vin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vin, E., Delchambre, A. Generalized cell formation: iterative versus simultaneous resolution with grouping genetic algorithm. J Intell Manuf 25, 1113–1124 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-013-0749-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-013-0749-7

Keywords

Navigation