Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling and measuring the structural complexity in assembly supply chain networks

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Complexity of assembly supply chains (ASCs) is a challenge for designers and managers, especially when ASC systems become increasingly complex due to technological developments and geographically various sourcing arrangements. One of the major challenges at the early design stage is to make decision about an appropriate configuration of ASC. This paper addresses modeling and measuring the structural complexity of ASC networks in order to establish a framework obtaining the optimal ASC configuration. Considering relationship between supply chains and assembly systems, structural complexity measures for ASC network and assembly lines inside the network are developed based on Shannon’s information entropy. This complexity model can be used to configure supply chain networks and assembly systems with robust performance. In order to generate different feasible configurations of ASCs, a four-step algorithm is proposed considering assembly sequence constraint. Finally, the optimal ASC network is obtained by comparing the total complexity values of the feasible configurations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baud-Lavigne, B., Bassetto, S., & Agard, B. (2014). A method for a robust optimization of joint product and supply chain design. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. doi:10.1007/s10845-014-0908-5.

  • Blecker, T., Kersten, W., Meyer, C.M. (2005). Development of an approach for analyzing supply chain complexity. In Mass Customization: Concepts–Tools–Realization. Proceedings of the International Mass Customization Meeting (pp. 47–59).

  • Borda, M. (2011). Fundamentals in information theory and coding (Vol. 6). New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, M.-C., & Okudan, G. (2014). An investigation on the impact of product modularity level on supply chain performance metrics: An industrial case study. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 25(1), 129–145. doi:10.1007/s10845-012-0680-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deshmukh, A. V., Talavage, J. J., & Barash, M. M. (1998). Complexity in manufacturing systems, Part 1: Analysis of static complexity. IIE Transactions, 30(7), 645–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • ElMaraghy, W., ElMaraghy, H., Tomiyama, T., & Monostori, L. (2012). Complexity in engineering design and manufacturing. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 61(2), 793–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frizelle, G., & Woodcock, E. (1995). Measuring complexity as an aid to developing operational strategy. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15(5), 26–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, K., Amaya, H., & Akai, R. (2013). Mathematical model for simultaneous design of module commonalization and supply chain configuration toward global product family. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 24(5), 991–1004. doi:10.1007/s10845-012-0641-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamta, N., Akbarpour Shirazi, M., & Fatemi Ghomi, S. M. T. (2015). A bi-level programming model for supply chain network optimization with assembly line balancing and push–pull strategy. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture. doi:10.1177/0954405414564406.

  • Hu, S. J., Zhu, X., Wang, H., & Koren, Y. (2008). Product variety and manufacturing complexity in assembly systems and supply chains. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 57(1), 45–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • İnkaya, T., & Akansel, M. (2015). Coordinated scheduling of the transfer lots in an assembly-type supply chain: A genetic algorithm approach. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. doi:10.1007/s10845-015-1041-9.

  • Milgate, M. (2001). Supply chain complexity and delivery performance: An international exploratory study. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 6(3), 106–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modrak, V., & Marton, D. (2012). Modelling and complexity assessment of assembly supply chain systems. Procedia Engineering, 48, 428–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modrak, V., & Marton, D. (2013). Structural complexity of assembly supply chains: A theoretical framework. Procedia CIRP, 7, 43–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papakostas, N., Efthymiou, K., Mourtzis, D., & Chryssolouris, G. (2009). Modelling the complexity of manufacturing systems using nonlinear dynamics approaches. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 58(1), 437–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuh, G., Monostori, L., Csáji, B. C., & Döring, S. (2008). Complexity-based modeling of reconfigurable collaborations in production industry. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 57(1), 445–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C. E. (2001). A mathematical theory of communication. ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review, 5(1), 3–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivadasan, S., Efstathiou, J., Calinescu, A., & Huatuco, L. H. (2006). Advances on measuring the operational complexity of supplier-customer systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 171(1), 208–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suh, N. P. (1999). A theory of complexity, periodicity and the design axioms. Research in Engineering Design, 11(2), 116–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suh, N. P. (2005). Complexity in engineering. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 54(2), 46–63.

  • Su, J. P., Lin, Y., & Lee, V. (2012). Component commonality in closed-loop manufacturing systems. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23(6), 2383–2396. doi:10.1007/s10845-010-0485-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A. E. (1952). L’Hospital’s rule. The American Mathematical Monthly, 59(1), 20–24.

  • Wang, H., Ko, J., Zhu, X., & Hu, S. J. (2010). A complexity model for assembly supply chains and its application to configuration design. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 132(2), 21005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., Zhu, X., Wang, H., Hu, S. J., Lin, Z., & Chen, G. (2011). Multi-objective optimization of product variety and manufacturing complexity in mixed-model assembly systems. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 30(1), 16–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webbink, R. F., & Hu, S. J. (2005). Automated generation of assembly system-design solutions. Automation Science and Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 2(1), 32–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiendahl, H.-P., & Scholtissek, P. (1994). Management and control of complexity in manufacturing. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 43(2), 533–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilding, R. D. (1998). Chaos theory: Implications for supply chain management. International Journal of Logistics Management, The, 9(1), 43–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeltzer, L., Limère, V., Van Landeghem, H., Aghezzaf, E.-H., & Stahre, J. (2013). Measuring complexity in mixed-model assembly workstations. International Journal of Production Research, 51(15), 4630–4643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, X., Hu, S. J., Koren, Y., & Marin, S. P. (2008). Modeling of manufacturing complexity in mixed-model assembly lines. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 130(5), 51013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Akbarpour Shirazi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hamta, N., Akbarpour Shirazi, M., Behdad, S. et al. Modeling and measuring the structural complexity in assembly supply chain networks. J Intell Manuf 29, 259–275 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-015-1106-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-015-1106-9

Keywords

Navigation