Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A hybrid ensemble and AHP approach for resilient supplier selection

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Suppliers play a crucial role in achieving the supply chain goals. In the context of risk management, suppliers are the most common source of external risks in modern supply chains. The recognition that continuity of supply chain flow under disruptive event is a critical issue has brought the attention of companies to the selection of resilient suppliers. In contrast to the extensive number of researches on traditional and green criteria of supplier selection, the criteria associated with resilient supplier selection are not well explored yet. This paper first seeks to explore the resilience criteria for supplier selection based on the notion of resilience capacities which can be divided into three categories: absorptive capacity, adaptive capacity, and restorative capacity. Absorptive capacity refers to the capability of system to withstand against disruptive event in prior or called as preparedness of supplier, while adaptive and restoration capacities imply the capability of supplier to adopt itself and restore from disruption or recoverability of supplier. We identified eight effective elements for resilience capacities which contribute to the resilience of suppliers. Advanced data mining approaches like predictive analytics models are used to predict the resilience value of each supplier. We applied ensemble methods by combining binomial logistics regression, classification and regression trees, and neural network to obtain better predictive performance than individual algorithm from the historical data to predict individual supplier’s resiliency. This resilience value, obtained from ensemble methods, is coupled with additional four variables to assess the suppliers’ overall performance and rank them using different supplier selection models. Finally, a case study has been performed on international plastic raw material suppliers for a U.S. based manufacturer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdollahi, M., Arvan, M., & Razmi, J. (2015). An integrated approach for supplier portfolio selection: Lean or agile? Expert Systems with Applications., 42, 679–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al Khaled, A., & Hosseini, S. (2015). Fuzzy adaptive imperialist competitive algorithm for global optimization. Neural Computing and Applications, 26(4), 813–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). (2009). Innovative Technological Institute (ITI). Washington, D.C.: ASME ITI LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arikan, F. (2013). A fuzzy solution approach for multi objective supplier selection. Expert Systems with Applications., 40, 947–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhamra, R., Dani, S., & Burnard, K. (2011). Resilience: The concept, a literature review and future directions. International Journal of Production Research., 49(18), 5375–5393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buyukozkan, G., & Cifci, G. (2012). A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers. Expert System with Applications, 39, 3000–3011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, F. T. S., Chan, H. K., & IP, R. W. L., & Lau, H. C. W., (2007). A decision support system for supplier selection in the airline industry. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacturer, 221(4), 741–758.

  • Chen, C. H., Tan, H. K., Liao, L. R., Chen, H. H., Chan, C. C., Cheng, J. J., et al. (2007). Long-term psychological outcome of 1999 Taiwan earthquake survivors: A survey of a high-risk sample with property damage. Comprehensive Psychiatry., 48(3), 269–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiou, C., Hsu, C., & Hwang, W. (2008). Comparative investigation on green supplier selection of the America, Japanese and Taiwanese electronics industry in China. IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, IEEM, 2008, (pp. 1909–1914).

  • Cho, G., Kim, J., Ho Park, H., Noh, C.-S., So, S.-H., Park, Y. S., & Jung, K.H. (2008). An optimal decision making model for supplier and buyer’s win-win strategy in a two echelon supply chain. Proceeding of the \(41^{\rm st}\) Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 7–10 January 2008 (pp. 1–12). Big Island, HI, USA: Waikoloa.

  • Choudhary, D., & Shankar, R. (2013). Joint decision of procurement lot-size, supplier selection, and carrier selection. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 19, 16–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, M., & Lee, H. (2004). Mitigating supply chain risk through improved confidence. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics management, 34(5), 388–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalalah, D., Hayajneh, M., & Batieha, F. (2011). A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making model for supplier selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(7), 8384–8391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, X., Hu, Y., Deng, Y., & Mahadevan, S. (2014). Supplier selection using AHP methodology extended by D numbers. Expert Systems with Applications, 41, 156–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Y., & Chen, F. T. S. (2011). A new fuzzy dempster MCDM method and its application in supplier selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(8), 9854–9861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, B., Guo, S., Huang, X., & Guo, J. (2015). A Pareto supplier selection algorithm for minimum the life cycle cost of complex product system. Expert Systems with Applications, 42, 4253–4264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazlollahtabar, H., Mahdavi, I., Talebi Ashoori, M., Kaviani, S., & Mahdavi-Amiri, N. (2011). A multi-objective decision making process of supplier selection and order allocation for multi-period scheduling in an electronic market. International Journal of Advanced manufacturing Technology, 52, 1039–1052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farzipoor Saen, R. (2007). Suppliers selection in the presence of both cardinal and ordinal data. European Journal of Operational Research, 183, 741–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gencer, C., & Gurpinar, D. (2007). Analytic network process in supplier selection: A case study in an electronic firm. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 31, 2475–2486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grisi, R. M., Guerra, L., & Naviglio, G. (2010). Supplier performance evaluation for green supply chain management. In T. Paolo (Ed.), Business performance measurement and management (pp. 149–163). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Guneri, A. F., Ertay, T., & Yucel, A. (2011). An approach based on ANFIS input selection and modeling for supplier selection problem. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 14907–14917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hang Hong, G., Chan Park, S., Sik Jang, D., & Min Rho, H. (2005). An effective supplier selection method for constructing a competitive supply-relationship. Expert Systems with Applications, 28, 629–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong-jun, L., & Bin., L. (2010). A research on supplier assesment indices system of green purchasing. 2010 International Conference on E-Business and E-government (ICEE). (pp 3335–3338) IEEE.

  • Hosseini, S., & Al Khaled, A. (2014). A survey on the imperialist competitive algorithm metaheuristic: Implementation in engineering domain and directions for future research. Applied Soft Computing, 24, 1078–1094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, C.-W., Kuo, T.-C., Chen, S.-H., & Hu, A. H. (2013). Using DEMATEL to develop a carbon management model of supplier selection in green supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner production, 56, 164–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, S. H., & Keskar, H. (2007). Comprehensive and configurable metrics for supplier selection. International Journal of Production Economics, 105, 510–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, Y. W. (2003). Integrating environmental criteria into supplier selection process. Journal of Mechanical Processing Technology, 138, 349–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Igarashi, M., De Boer, L., & Magerholm Fet, A. (2013). What is required for greener supplier selection? A literature review and conceptual model development. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 19, 247–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Igoulalene, I., Benyoucef, L., & Kumar Tiwari, M. (2015). Novel fuzzy hybrid multi-criteria decision making approaches for the strategic supplier selection problem. Expert Systems with Applications, 42, 3342–3356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahraman, C., & Kaya, I. (2010). Supplier selection in agile manufacturing using fuzzy AHP. In L. Wang & S. C. L. Koh (Eds.), Enterprise networks and logistics for agile manufacturing (pp. 155–190). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, H.-Y., Lee, A. H. I., & Yang, C.-Y. (2010). A fuzzy ANP model for supplier selection as applied to IC packing. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23, 1477–1488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karsak, E. E., & Dursun, M. (2014). An integrated supplier selection methodology incorporating QFD and DEA with imprecise data. Expert Systems with Applications, 41, 6995–7004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilincci, O., & Onal, S. A. (2011). Fuzzy AHP approach for supplier selection in a washing machine company. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 9656–9664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koivo, H. N. (2008). Neural Networks: Basic using MATLAB Neural Network Toolbox. http://staff.ttu.ee/~jmajak/Neural_networks_basics_.pdf.

  • Kumar Kar, A. (2014). Revisiting the supplier selection problem: An integrated approach for group decision support. Expert Systems with Applications, 41, 2762–2771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., Cho, H., & Kim, Y. S. (2014). Assessing business impacts of agility criterion and order allocation strategy in multi-criteria supplier selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(3), 1136–1148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, G.-D., Yamaguchi, D., & Nagai, M. (2008). A grey-based decision-making approach to supplier selection. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 36, 1032–1040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, C.-N., & Kao, H.-P. (2011). An integrated fuzzy TOPSIS and MCGP approach to supplier selection in supply chain management. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 10803–10811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lienland, B., Baumgartner, A., & Kunbben, E. (2013). The undervaluation of corporate reputation as a supplier selection factor: An analysis of ingredient branding of complex products in the manufacturing industry. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 19, 84–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, X., Rosenber, D., & Barnes, D. (2009). Supplier selection in agile supply chains: An information-processing model and illustration. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 15, 249–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masi, D., Micheli, G. J. L., & Cagno, E. (2013). A meta-model for choosing a supplier selection technique within an EPC company. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 19, 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manual, J. (2013). The long road to recovery: Environmental health impacts on hurricane sandy. Environmental Health Perspectives., 212, 152–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozkok, B. A., & Tiryaki, F. (2011). A compensatory fuzzy approach to multi-objective supplier selection problem with multiple-item. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 11363–11368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papadakis, I. S. (2006). Financial performance of supply chains after disruptions: An event study. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 11(1), 25–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, T. J., Fiksel, J., & Croxton, K. L. (2011). Ensuring supply chain resilience: Development of a conceptual framework. Journal of Business Logistics, 31, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pi, W.-N., & Low, C. (2005). Supplier evaluation and selection using Taguchi loss functions. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 26, 155–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajesh, R., & Ravi, V. (2015). Supplier selection in resilient supply chains: A grey relational analysis approach. Journal of Cleaner production, 86, 343–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei, J., & Ortt, R. (2013). Supplier segmentation using fuzzy logic. Industrial Marketing Management, 42, 507–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytical hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resources allocation. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanayei, A., Mousavi, S. F., Abdi, M. R., & Mohaghar, A. (2008). An integrated group decision-making process for supplier selection and order allocation using multi-attribute utility theory and linear programming. Journal of the Franklin Institute., 345, 731–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawik, T. (2013). Selection of resilient supply portfolio under disruption risks. Omega, 41, 259–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S., Basligil, H., Sen, C. G., & Barali, H. (2008). A framework for defining both qualitative and quantitative supplier selection criteria considering the buyer-supplier integration strategies. International Journal of production Research, 46(7), 1825–1845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, C. G., Basligil, H., Sen, S., & Baracli, H. (2009). An integrated decision support system dealing with qualitative and quantitative objectives for enterprise software selection. Expert Systems with Application, 36(3), 5272–5283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheffi, Y. (2006). Resilience reduces risk. Logistics Quarterly, 12(1), 12–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A. (2014). Supplier evaluation and demand allocation among suppliers in a supply chain. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 20, 167–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stueland, V.J. (2004). Supplier evaluations: best practices and creating or improving your own evaluation, Wells Fargo Services Company. Proceeding of 89th Annual International Supply Management Conference.

  • Torabi, S. A., Baghersad, M., & Mansouri, S. A. (2015). Resilient supplier selection and order allocation under operational and disruption risks. Transportation Research Part E, 79, 22–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toloo, M., & Nalchigar, S. (2011). A new DEA method for supplier selection in presence of both cardinal and ordinal data. Expert Systems with Applications., 38, 14726–14731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H. S., & Che, Z. H. (2007). An integrated model for supplier selection decisions in configuration changes. Expert Systems with Applications, 32, 1132–1140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, D. D., Zhang, Y., Wu, D., & Olson, D. L. (2010). Fuzzy multiobjective programming for supplier selection and risk modeling: A possibility approach. European Journal of Operational Research., 200(3), 774–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WWW resource 1. http://www.plasticsindustry.org/

  • WWW resource 2. http://www.alibaba.com

  • You, X.-Y., You, J.-X., Liu, H.-C., & Zhen, L. (2015). Group multi-criteria supplier selection using an extended VIKOR method with interval 2-tuple linguistic information. Expert Systems with Applications, 42, 1906–1916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zsidisin, G. A., & Smith, M. E. (2005). Managing supply risk with early supplier involvement: A case study and research propositions. Journal of Supply Chain Management., 41(4), 44–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions which notably helped to improve the quality of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA

    Seyedmohsen Hosseini

  2. Influence Health, Birmingham, AL, USA

    Abdullah Al Khaled

Authors
  1. Seyedmohsen Hosseini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abdullah Al Khaled
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seyedmohsen Hosseini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hosseini, S., Khaled, A.A. A hybrid ensemble and AHP approach for resilient supplier selection. J Intell Manuf 30, 207–228 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-016-1241-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-016-1241-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation