Abstract
This paper investigates a less-than-truckload dynamic pricing decision-making problem in the context of the Physical Internet (PI). The PI can be seen as the interconnection of logistics networks via open PI-hubs. In terms of transport, PI-hubs can be considered as spot freight markets where LTL requests with different volumes/destinations continuously arrive over time and only remain for short periods. Carriers can bid for these requests using short-term contracts. In a dynamic, stochastic environment like this, a major concern for carriers is how to propose prices for requests to maximise their revenue. The latter is determined by the proposed price and the probability of winning the request at that price. This paper proposes a dynamic pricing model based on an auction mechanism to optimise the carrier’s bid price. An experimental study is conducted in which two pricing strategies are proposed and assessed: a unique bidding price (one unique price for all requests at an auction), and a variable bidding price (price for each request at an auction). Three influencing factors are also investigated: quantity of requests, carrier capacity, and cost. The experimental results provide insightful conclusions and useful guidelines for carriers regarding pricing decisions in PI-hubs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amaruchkul, K., Cooper, W. L., & Gupta, D. (2007). Single-leg air-cargo revenue management. Transportation Science, 41(4), 457–469.
Ballot, E., Montreuil, B., & Meller, R. (2014). The physical internet: The network of logistics networks. Paris: La documentation Française.
Coşgun, Ö., Ekinci, Y., & Yanık, S. (2014). Fuzzy rule-based demand forecasting for dynamic pricing of a maritime company. Knowledge-Based Systems, 70, 88–96.
Crevier, B., Cordeau, J.-F., & Savard, G. (2012). Integrated operations planning and revenue management for rail freight transportation. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 46(1), 100–119.
Dai, B., & Chen, H. (2011). A multi-agent and auction-based framework and approach for carrier collaboration. Logistics Research, 3(2–3), 101–120. doi:10.1007/s12159-011-0046-9.
Di, L., & Hualong, Y. (2012). Dynamic pricing model of container sea-rail intermodal transport on single OD line. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 12(4), 122–127.
Douma, A., Schuur, P., & van der Heijden, M. (2006). Applying revenue management to agent-based transportation planning. Beta Working Paper Series, WP-169, University of Twente.
Figliozzi, M., Mahmassani, H., & Jaillet, P. (2006). Quantifying opportunity costs in sequential transportation auctions for truckload acquisition. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1964, 247–252.
Figliozzi, M. A., Mahmassani, H. S., & Jaillet, P. (2007). Pricing in dynamic vehicle routing problems. Transportation Science, 41(3), 302–318.
Huang, K., & Chang, K.-C. (2010). An approximate algorithm for the two-dimensional air cargo revenue management problem. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 46(3), 426–435.
Huang, G. Q., & Xu, S. X. (2013). Truthful multi-unit transportation procurement auctions for logistics e-marketplaces. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 47, 127–148.
Kasilingam, R. G. (1997). Air cargo revenue management: Characteristics and complexities. European Journal of Operational Research, 96(1), 36–44. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(95)00329-0.
Klemperer, P. (1999). Auction theory: A guide to the literature. Journal of Economic Surveys, 13(3), 227–286.
Kraft, E. R. (2002). Scheduling railway freight delivery appointments using a bid price approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 36(2), 145–165.
Kuyzu, G., Akyol, Ç. G., Ergun, Ö., & Savelsbergh, M. (2015). Bid price optimization for truckload carriers in simultaneous transportation procurement auctions. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 73, 34–58.
Li, L., Lin, X., Negenborn, R. R., & De Schutter, B. (2015). Pricing intermodal freight transport services: A cost-plus-pricing strategy. In F. Corman, S. Voß, & R. R. Negenborn (Eds.), Computational logistics (pp. 541–556). Springer.
Lin, K. Y. (2006). Dynamic pricing with real-time demand learning. European Journal of Operational Research, 174(1), 522–538. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.01.041.
Lin, Y.-H., Meller, R. D., Ellis, K. P., Thomas, L. M., & Lombardi, B. J. (2014). A decomposition-based approach for the selection of standardized modular containers. International Journal of Production Research, 52(15), 4660–4672. doi:10.1080/00207543.2014.883468.
Mervis, J. (2014). The information highway gets physical: The physical internet would move goods the way its namesake moves data. Science, 344(6188), 1057–1196.
Mes, M., & Van der Heijden, M. (2007). Pricing and scheduling strategies for carriers and shippers in sequential transportation auctions. In Proceedings of the sixth triennial symposium on transportation analysis. Phuket Island.
Mes, M. R. K., van der Heijden, M. C., & Schuur, P. C. (2006). Opportunity costs calculation in agent based vehicle routing and scheduling. Beta Working Paper Series, WP-168.
Montreuil, B., Meller, R. D., & Ballot, E. (2013). Physical internet foundations. In T. Borangiu, A. Thomas, & D. Trentesaux (Eds.), Service orientation in holonic and multi agent manufacturing and robotics (pp. 151–166). Springer.
Montreuil, B. (2011). Toward a physical internet: Meeting the global logistics sustainability grand challenge. Logistics Research, 3(2–3), 71–87. doi:10.1007/s12159-011-0045-x.
Munari, F. (2012). Competition in liner shipping. In J. Basedow, U. Magnus, & R. Wolfrum (Eds.), The Hamburg lectures on maritime affairs 2009 and 2010 (pp. 3-27). Springer.
Pan, S., Xu, X., & Ballot, E. (2014). Auction-based transport services allocation in physical internet: A simulation framework. In 5th international conference on information systems, logistics and supply chain.
Sallez, Y., Pan, S., Montreuil, B., Berger, T., & Ballot, E. (2016). On the activeness of intelligent physical internet containers. Computers in Industry, 81, 96–104. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2015.12.006.
Sarraj, R., Ballot, E., Pan, S., Hakimi, D., & Montreuil, B. (2014a). Interconnected logistic networks and protocols: Simulation-based efficiency assessment. International Journal of Production Research, 52(11), 3185–3208.
Sarraj, R., Ballot, E., Pan, S., & Montreuil, B. (2014b). Analogies between internet network and logistics service networks: Challenges involved in the interconnection. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 25(6), 1207–1219. doi:10.1007/s10845-012-0697-7.
Talluri, K. T., & Van Ryzin, G. J. (2006). The theory and practice of revenue management (Vol. 68). New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
Ting, S.-C., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2004). An optimal containership slot allocation for liner shipping revenue management. Maritime Policy & Management, 31(3), 199–211.
Toptal, A., & Bingöl, S. O. (2011). Transportation pricing of a truckload carrier. European Journal of Operational Research, 214(3), 559–567.
Uğurlu, S., Coşgun, Ö., & Ekinci, Y. (2012). A dynamic pricing model for a maritime transportation service provider. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 5(6), 1109–1119.
Wang, X., & Kopfer, H. (2011). Collaborative transportation planning of less-than-truckload freight: Request exchange through a route-based combinatorial auction. Bremen: Faculty 7.
Xu, S. X., & Huang, G. Q. (2013). Transportation service procurement in periodic sealed double auctions with stochastic demand and supply. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 56, 136–160.
Zhou, W.-H., & Lee, C.-Y. (2009). Pricing and competition in a transportation market with empty equipment repositioning. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 43(6), 677–691.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 4.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Qiao, B., Pan, S. & Ballot, E. Dynamic pricing model for less-than-truckload carriers in the Physical Internet. J Intell Manuf 30, 2631–2643 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-016-1289-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-016-1289-8