Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic pricing model for less-than-truckload carriers in the Physical Internet

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates a less-than-truckload dynamic pricing decision-making problem in the context of the Physical Internet (PI). The PI can be seen as the interconnection of logistics networks via open PI-hubs. In terms of transport, PI-hubs can be considered as spot freight markets where LTL requests with different volumes/destinations continuously arrive over time and only remain for short periods. Carriers can bid for these requests using short-term contracts. In a dynamic, stochastic environment like this, a major concern for carriers is how to propose prices for requests to maximise their revenue. The latter is determined by the proposed price and the probability of winning the request at that price. This paper proposes a dynamic pricing model based on an auction mechanism to optimise the carrier’s bid price. An experimental study is conducted in which two pricing strategies are proposed and assessed: a unique bidding price (one unique price for all requests at an auction), and a variable bidding price (price for each request at an auction). Three influencing factors are also investigated: quantity of requests, carrier capacity, and cost. The experimental results provide insightful conclusions and useful guidelines for carriers regarding pricing decisions in PI-hubs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amaruchkul, K., Cooper, W. L., & Gupta, D. (2007). Single-leg air-cargo revenue management. Transportation Science, 41(4), 457–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballot, E., Montreuil, B., & Meller, R. (2014). The physical internet: The network of logistics networks. Paris: La documentation Française.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coşgun, Ö., Ekinci, Y., & Yanık, S. (2014). Fuzzy rule-based demand forecasting for dynamic pricing of a maritime company. Knowledge-Based Systems, 70, 88–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crevier, B., Cordeau, J.-F., & Savard, G. (2012). Integrated operations planning and revenue management for rail freight transportation. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 46(1), 100–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai, B., & Chen, H. (2011). A multi-agent and auction-based framework and approach for carrier collaboration. Logistics Research, 3(2–3), 101–120. doi:10.1007/s12159-011-0046-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di, L., & Hualong, Y. (2012). Dynamic pricing model of container sea-rail intermodal transport on single OD line. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 12(4), 122–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douma, A., Schuur, P., & van der Heijden, M. (2006). Applying revenue management to agent-based transportation planning. Beta Working Paper Series, WP-169, University of Twente.

  • Figliozzi, M., Mahmassani, H., & Jaillet, P. (2006). Quantifying opportunity costs in sequential transportation auctions for truckload acquisition. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1964, 247–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figliozzi, M. A., Mahmassani, H. S., & Jaillet, P. (2007). Pricing in dynamic vehicle routing problems. Transportation Science, 41(3), 302–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, K., & Chang, K.-C. (2010). An approximate algorithm for the two-dimensional air cargo revenue management problem. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 46(3), 426–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, G. Q., & Xu, S. X. (2013). Truthful multi-unit transportation procurement auctions for logistics e-marketplaces. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 47, 127–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasilingam, R. G. (1997). Air cargo revenue management: Characteristics and complexities. European Journal of Operational Research, 96(1), 36–44. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(95)00329-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klemperer, P. (1999). Auction theory: A guide to the literature. Journal of Economic Surveys, 13(3), 227–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraft, E. R. (2002). Scheduling railway freight delivery appointments using a bid price approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 36(2), 145–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuyzu, G., Akyol, Ç. G., Ergun, Ö., & Savelsbergh, M. (2015). Bid price optimization for truckload carriers in simultaneous transportation procurement auctions. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 73, 34–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, L., Lin, X., Negenborn, R. R., & De Schutter, B. (2015). Pricing intermodal freight transport services: A cost-plus-pricing strategy. In F. Corman, S. Voß, & R. R. Negenborn (Eds.), Computational logistics (pp. 541–556). Springer.

  • Lin, K. Y. (2006). Dynamic pricing with real-time demand learning. European Journal of Operational Research, 174(1), 522–538. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.01.041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Y.-H., Meller, R. D., Ellis, K. P., Thomas, L. M., & Lombardi, B. J. (2014). A decomposition-based approach for the selection of standardized modular containers. International Journal of Production Research, 52(15), 4660–4672. doi:10.1080/00207543.2014.883468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mervis, J. (2014). The information highway gets physical: The physical internet would move goods the way its namesake moves data. Science, 344(6188), 1057–1196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mes, M., & Van der Heijden, M. (2007). Pricing and scheduling strategies for carriers and shippers in sequential transportation auctions. In Proceedings of the sixth triennial symposium on transportation analysis. Phuket Island.

  • Mes, M. R. K., van der Heijden, M. C., & Schuur, P. C. (2006). Opportunity costs calculation in agent based vehicle routing and scheduling. Beta Working Paper Series, WP-168.

  • Montreuil, B., Meller, R. D., & Ballot, E. (2013). Physical internet foundations. In T. Borangiu, A. Thomas, & D. Trentesaux (Eds.), Service orientation in holonic and multi agent manufacturing and robotics (pp. 151–166). Springer.

  • Montreuil, B. (2011). Toward a physical internet: Meeting the global logistics sustainability grand challenge. Logistics Research, 3(2–3), 71–87. doi:10.1007/s12159-011-0045-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munari, F. (2012). Competition in liner shipping. In J. Basedow, U. Magnus, & R. Wolfrum (Eds.), The Hamburg lectures on maritime affairs 2009 and 2010 (pp. 3-27). Springer.

  • Pan, S., Xu, X., & Ballot, E. (2014). Auction-based transport services allocation in physical internet: A simulation framework. In 5th international conference on information systems, logistics and supply chain.

  • Sallez, Y., Pan, S., Montreuil, B., Berger, T., & Ballot, E. (2016). On the activeness of intelligent physical internet containers. Computers in Industry, 81, 96–104. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2015.12.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarraj, R., Ballot, E., Pan, S., Hakimi, D., & Montreuil, B. (2014a). Interconnected logistic networks and protocols: Simulation-based efficiency assessment. International Journal of Production Research, 52(11), 3185–3208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarraj, R., Ballot, E., Pan, S., & Montreuil, B. (2014b). Analogies between internet network and logistics service networks: Challenges involved in the interconnection. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 25(6), 1207–1219. doi:10.1007/s10845-012-0697-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talluri, K. T., & Van Ryzin, G. J. (2006). The theory and practice of revenue management (Vol. 68). New York: Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ting, S.-C., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2004). An optimal containership slot allocation for liner shipping revenue management. Maritime Policy & Management, 31(3), 199–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toptal, A., & Bingöl, S. O. (2011). Transportation pricing of a truckload carrier. European Journal of Operational Research, 214(3), 559–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uğurlu, S., Coşgun, Ö., & Ekinci, Y. (2012). A dynamic pricing model for a maritime transportation service provider. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 5(6), 1109–1119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., & Kopfer, H. (2011). Collaborative transportation planning of less-than-truckload freight: Request exchange through a route-based combinatorial auction. Bremen: Faculty 7.

  • Xu, S. X., & Huang, G. Q. (2013). Transportation service procurement in periodic sealed double auctions with stochastic demand and supply. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 56, 136–160.

  • Zhou, W.-H., & Lee, C.-Y. (2009). Pricing and competition in a transportation market with empty equipment repositioning. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 43(6), 677–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shenle Pan.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 4.

Table 4 Set of optimal prices tested in Scenario 2 (Line = the remaining capacity, Column = the number of remaining requests)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qiao, B., Pan, S. & Ballot, E. Dynamic pricing model for less-than-truckload carriers in the Physical Internet. J Intell Manuf 30, 2631–2643 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-016-1289-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-016-1289-8

Keywords

Navigation