Skip to main content
Log in

Possible winner problems on partial tournaments: a parameterized study

  • Published:
Journal of Combinatorial Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study possible winner problems related to the uncovered set and the Banks set on partial tournaments from the viewpoint of parameterized complexity. We first study a problem where given a partial tournament D and a subset X of vertices, we are asked to add some arcs to D such that all vertices in X are included in the uncovered set. We focus on two parameterizations: parameterized by |X| and parameterized by the number of arcs to be added. In addition, we study a parameterized variant of the problem which is to determine whether all vertices of X can be included in the uncovered set by reversing at most k arcs. Finally, we study some parameterizations of a possible winner problem on partial tournaments, where we are given a partial tournament D and a distinguished vertex p, and asked whether D has a maximal transitive subtournament with p being the 0-indegree vertex. These parameterized problems are related to the Banks set. We achieve \(\mathcal {XP}\) results, \(\mathcal {W}\)-hardness results as well as \(\mathcal {FPT}\) results along with a kernelization lower bound for the problems studied in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In Aziz et al. (2015), the authors use \(\text {PSW}_\text {UC}\) to denote the problem.

References

  • Aziz H, Brill M, Fischer FA, Harrenstein P, Lang J, Seedig HG (2015) Possible and necessary winners of partial tournaments. J Artif Intell Res (JAIR) 54:493–534. doi:10.1613/jair.4856

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Banks JS (1985) Sophisticated voting outcomes and agenda control. Soc Choice Welf 1(4):295–306

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bodlaender HL (2009) Kernelization: New upper and lower bound techniques. In: IWPEC, pp 17–37

  • Brandt F, Fischer FA, Harrenstein P (2009) The computational complexity of choice sets. Math Log Q 55(4):444–459

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Liu Y, Lu S, O’Sullivan B, Razgon I (2008) A fixed-parameter algorithm for the directed feedback vertex set problem. In: STOC, pp 177–186

  • Dom M, Guo J, Hüffner F, Niedermeier R, Truß A (2010) Fixed-parameter tractability results for feedback set problems in tournaments. J Discret Algorithm 8(1):76–86

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dom M, Lokshtanov D, Saurabh S (2009) Incompressibility through colors and IDs. ICALP 1:378–389

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Downey RG, Fellows MR (1995) Parameterized computational feasibility. In: Feasible mathematics II, pp 219–244

  • Downey RG, Fellows MR (1999) Parameterized complexity. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Downey RG, Fellows MR, Stege U (1999) Parameterized complexity: a framework for systematically confronting computational intractability. In: Contemporary trends in discrete mathematics: from DIMACS and DIMATIA to the future, pp 49–99. Springer, New York

  • Fellows MR, Hermelin D, Rosamond FA, Vialette S (2009) On the parameterized complexity of multiple-interval graph problems. Theor Comput Sci 410(1):53–61

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn PC (1977) Condorcet social choice functions. SIAM J Appl Math 33(3):469–489

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Guo J, Niedermeier R (2007) Invitation to data reduction and problem kernelization. SIGACT News 38(1):31–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudry O (2009) A survey on the complexity of tournament solutions. Math Soc Sci 57(3):292–303

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Landau H (1953) On dominance relations and the structure of animal societies III. The condition for score structure. B Math Biophys 15(2):143–148

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Miller NR (1980) A new solution set for tournaments and majority voting: further graph-theoretical approaches to the theory of voting. Am J Polit Sci 24(1):68–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mnich M, Shrestha YR, Yang Y (2015) When does Schwartz conjecture hold? In: IJCAI, pp 603–609

  • Niedermeier R (2006) Invitation to fixed-parameter algorithms. Oxford University Press Inc, Oxford

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Raman V, Saurabh S (2006) Parameterized algorithms for feedback set problems and their duals in tournaments. Theor Comput Sci 351(3):446–458. doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2005.10.010

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Raman V, Sikdar S (2007) Parameterized complexity of the induced subgraph problem in directed graphs. Inf Process Lett 104(3):79–85

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Woeginger GJ (2003) Banks winners in tournaments are difficult to recognize. Soc Choice Welf 20(3):523–528

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank the anonymous reviewers of ADT 2013 for their constructive comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yongjie Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, Y., Guo, J. Possible winner problems on partial tournaments: a parameterized study. J Comb Optim 33, 882–896 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-016-0012-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-016-0012-1

Keywords

Navigation