Skip to main content
Log in

Algorithmic aspects of b-disjunctive domination in graphs

  • Published:
Journal of Combinatorial Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For a fixed integer \(b>1\), a set \(D\subseteq V\) is called a b-disjunctive dominating set of the graph \(G=(V,E)\) if for every vertex \(v\in V{\setminus }D\), v is either adjacent to a vertex of D or has at least b vertices in D at distance 2 from it. The Minimum b-Disjunctive Domination Problem (MbDDP) is to find a b-disjunctive dominating set of minimum cardinality. The cardinality of a minimum b-disjunctive dominating set of G is called the b-disjunctive domination number of G, and is denoted by \(\gamma _{b}^{d}(G)\). Given a positive integer k and a graph G, the b-Disjunctive Domination Decision Problem (bDDDP) is to decide whether G has a b-disjunctive dominating set of cardinality at most k. In this paper, we first show that for a proper interval graph G, \(\gamma _{b}^{d}(G)\) is equal to \(\gamma (G)\), the domination number of G for \(b \ge 3\) and observe that \(\gamma _{b}^{d}(G)\) need not be equal to \(\gamma (G)\) for \(b=2\). We then propose a polynomial time algorithm to compute a minimum cardinality b-disjunctive dominating set of a proper interval graph for \(b=2\). Next we tighten the NP-completeness of bDDDP by showing that it remains NP-complete even in chordal graphs. We also propose a \((\ln ({\varDelta }^{2}+(b-1){\varDelta }+b)+1)\)-approximation algorithm for MbDDP, where \({\varDelta }\) is the maximum degree of input graph \(G=(V,E)\) and prove that MbDDP cannot be approximated within \((1-\epsilon ) \ln (|V|)\) for any \(\epsilon >0\) unless NP \(\subseteq \) DTIME\((|V|^{O(\log \log |V|)})\). Finally, we show that MbDDP is APX-complete for bipartite graphs with maximum degree \(\max \{b,4\}\).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alimonti P, Kann V (2000) Some APX-completeness results for cubic graphs. Theor Comput Sci 237:123–134

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ambalath AM, Balasundaram R, Rao C, Koppula V, Misra N, Philip G, Ramanujan MS (2010) On the kernelization complexity of colorful motifs. In: IPEC, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6478:14–25

  • Ausiello G, Crescenzi P, Gambosi G, Kann V, Marchetti-Spaccamela A, Protasi M (1999) Complexity and approximation. Springer, Berlin

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bertossi AA (1984) Dominating sets for split and bipartite graphs. Inf Process Lett 19(1):37–40

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chang MS (1998) Efficient algorithms for the domination problems on interval and circular-arc graphs. SIAM J Comput 27(6):1671–1694

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chlebík M, Chlebíková J (2008) Approximation hardness of dominating set problems in bounded degree graphs. Inf Comput 206:1264–1275

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dankelmann P, Day D, Erwin D, Mukwembi S, Swart H (2009) Domination with exponential decay. Discrete Math 309:5877–5883

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fulkerson DR, Gross OA (1965) Incidence matrices and interval graphs. Pac J Math 15:835–855

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Goddard W, Henning MA, McPillan CA (2014) The disjunctive domination number of a graph. Quaest Math 37(4):547–561

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes TW, Hedetniemi ST, Slater PJ (1998a) Fundamentals of domination in graphs. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes TW, Hedetniemi ST, Slater PJ (1998b) Domination in graphs, advanced topics. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Henning MA, Marcon SA (2015a) Domination versus disjunctive domination in trees. Discrete Appl Math 184:171–177

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Henning MA, Marcon SA (2015b) A constructive characterization of trees with equal total domination and disjunctive domination numbers. Quaest Math 39:531–543

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Henning MA, Naicker V (2014) Disjunctive total domination in graphs. J Comb Optim 31:1090–1110

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Henning MA, Naicker V (2015) Graphs with large disjunctive total domination number. Discrete Appl Math 17:255–282

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Henning MA, Naicker V (2016) Bounds on the disjunctive total domination number of a tree. Discuss Math Graph Theory 36:153–171

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson MS, Peters K (1989) Complexity questions for \(n\)-domination and related parameters. In: Eighteenth Manitoba conference on numerical mathematics and computing (Winnipeg, MB, 1988) Congr. Numer. 68, 722

  • Jamison RE, Laskar R (1984) Elimination orderings of chordal graphs. In: Combinatorics and applications (Calcutta, 1982), ISI, Calcutta, pp 192–200

  • Panda BS, Das SK (2003) A linear time recognition algorithm for proper interval graphs. Inf Process Lett 87(3):153–161

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Panda BS, Pandey A, Paul S (2015) Algorithmic aspects of disjunctive domination in graphs. In: COCOON, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 9198:325–336

  • Pandey A, Panda BS (2016) \(b\)-Disjunctive total domination in graphs: algorithm and hardness results. In: CALDAM, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 9602:277–288

  • Rajgopalan S, Vazirani VV (1999) Primal-dual RNC approximation algorithms for set cover and covering integer programs. SIAM J Comput 28:526–541

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments to improve the presentation of the paper. A part of this work was done when S. Paul was a NBHM Postdoc Fellow (No. 2/40(49)/2014/R&D-II/1581) at Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arti Pandey.

Additional information

The work was done when the corresponding author (Arti Pandey) was in IIIT Guwahati.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Panda, B.S., Pandey, A. & Paul, S. Algorithmic aspects of b-disjunctive domination in graphs. J Comb Optim 36, 572–590 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-017-0112-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-017-0112-6

Keywords

Navigation