Skip to main content
Log in

An optimal algorithm for Global Optimization and adaptive covering

  • Published:
Journal of Global Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The general class of zero-order Global Optimization problems is split into subclasses according to a proposed “Complexity measure” and the computational complexity of each subclass is rigorously estimated. Then, the laboriousness (computational demand) of general Branch-and-Bound (BnB) methods is estimated for each subclass. For conventional “Cubic” BnB based on splitting an n-dimensional cube into \(2^n\) sub-cubes, both upper and lower laboriousness estimates are obtained. The value of the Complexity measure for a problem subclass enters linearly into all complexity and laboriousness estimates for that subclass. A new BnB method based on the lattice \(A_n^*\) is presented with upper laboriousness bound that is, though conservative, smaller by a factor of \(O((4/3)^n)\) than the lower bound of the conventional method. The optimality of the new method is discussed. All results are extended to the class of Adaptive Covering problems—that is, covering of a large n-dimensional set by balls of different size, where the size of each ball is defined by a locally computed criterion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nemirovsky, A.S., Yudin, D.B.: Problem Complexity and Method Efficiency in Optimization. Wiley, New York (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nesterov, YuE, Nemirovskii, A.S.: Interior Point Polynomial Algorithms in Convex Programming. SIAM, Philadelphia (1994)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Floudas, C.A.: Deterministic Global Optimization. Theory, Methods and Applications. Kluwer, Dordr (2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Shor, N.Z.: Minimization Methods for Non-differentiable Functions. Springer, Berlin (1985)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Conway, J.H., Sloane, N.J.A.: Sphere Packings, Lattices and Groups. Springer, New York (1993)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Belitz, P., Bewley, T.: Efficient Derivative-Free Optimization. In: Proceedings of the 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control New Orleans, LA, USA, pp. 5358–5363. 12–14 Dec 2007

  7. Booker, A., Dennis Jr., J., Frank, P., Serafini, D., Torczon, V., Trosset, M.: A rigorous framework for optimization of expensive functions by surrogates. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 17, 1–13 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Marsden, A.L., Wang, M., Dennis Jr., J.E., Moin, P.: Optimal aeroacoustic shape design using the surrogate management framework. Optim. Eng. 5, 235–262 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Charles, A., Dennis, J.J.R.: Mesh adaptive direct search algorithms for constrained optimization. SIAM J. Optim. 17, 2006–2029 (2004)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Coope, I.D., Price, C.J.: On the convergence of grid-based methods for unconstrained optimization. SIAM J. Optim. 11, 859–869 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Berger, M.J., Colella, P.: Local adaptive mesh refinement for shock hydrodynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 82, 64–84 (1989)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Ceniceros, H.D., Hou, T.Y.: An efficient dynamically adaptive mesh for potentially singular solutions. J. Comput. Phys. 172, 609–639 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Henk J.: Integration over two-dimensional Brillouin zones by adaptive mesh refinement. Phys. Rev. B 64, article 035412

  14. Li, X., Ramanathan, S., Parashar, M.: Hierarchical partitioning techniques for structured adaptive mesh refinement (SAMR) applications. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Parallel Processing, Vancouver, BC, Canada, pp. 336–343 (2002). 20–23 Aug 2002

  15. Heinkenschloss, M., Herty, M.: A spatial domain decomposition method for parabolic optimal control problems. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 201, 88–111 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Kiseleva, E., Stepanchuk, T.: On the efficiency of a global non-differentiable optimization algorithm based on the method of optimal set partitioning. J. Glob. Optim. 25, 209–235 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Abramowitz, M., Stegun, I.A. (eds.).: Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables, 470 pp. Dover Publications, N.Y. (1972)

  18. Gradshteyn, I.S., Ryzhik, I.M.: Table of Integrals, Series, and Products. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Sels, V., et al.: Hybrid tabu search and a truncated branch-and-bound for the unrelated parallel machine scheduling problem. Comput. Oper. Res. 53, 107–117 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Franck, B., Neumann, K., Schwindt, C.: Truncated branch-and-bound, schedule-construction, and schedule-improvement procedures for resource-constrained project scheduling. OR Spektrum 23, 297–324 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Constales, D.: The volume of the intersection of a cube and a ball in N-space. In: Constales, D. (ed.) Problems and Solutions, Problem 96-19, vol. 39, pp. 783–786. SIAM Review (1997)

  22. Flum, J., Grohe, M.: Parameterized Complexity Theory. Springer, New York (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. McKilliam R.G., Clarkson I.V.L., Smith W.D., Quinn B.G.: A linear time nearest point algorithm for the lattice \(A_n^*\), International Symposium on Information Theory and Its Applications (ISITA 2008), Auckland, Australia, pp. 1–5. 7–10 Dec 2008

  24. McKilliam, R.G., Clarkson, I.V.L., Quinn, B.G.: An algorithm to compute the nearest point in the lattice \(A_n^*\). IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 54, 4378–4381 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This material is based in part on research supported by Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) under agreement number FA8650-11-1-7150. The U.S. Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for Governmental purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation thereon. The views and conclusions contained herein are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies or endorsements, either expressed or implied, of the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) or the U.S. Government. The first author expresses his deep appreciation to Prof. Sergey Gusev and Prof. Arkadii Nemirovskii who many years ago encouraged him to work on this problem.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Serge L. Shishkin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shishkin, S.L., Finn, A.M. An optimal algorithm for Global Optimization and adaptive covering. J Glob Optim 66, 535–572 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-016-0416-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-016-0416-6

Keywords

Navigation