Abstract
Nursing documentation is an important part of clinical documentation. However, documentation of the nursing process is frequently lacking quality. There are high expectations that computer support in nursing documentation will help improve documentation quality. This study aimed to examine whether the introduction of a computer based nursing documentation system can improve documentation quality. A prospective intervention study was conducted on 4 wards of the University Medical Center Heidelberg over a period of 18 months. Two wards in the Psychiatric University Medical Center Heidelberg were involved in the research study, as well as a dermatological and a pediatric ward. The results of the study show a significant improvement of documentation quantity and quality on three of the four wards. Positive aspects include completeness of documentation on the nursing process, formal aspects and subjective quality improvement by the nurses. Negative aspects were mainly associated with the contents of the care plans.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Reference
Kurtenbach, H., Golombek, G., and Siebers, H., Krankenpflegegesetz—Kommentar. 4 (ed.): Stuttgart, Kohlhammer, 1987.
Davis, B. D., Billings, J. R., and Ryland, R. K., Evaluation of nursing process documentation. J. Adv. Nurs. 19(5):960–968, 1994.
Hohmann, U., Weinrich, H., and Gatschenberger, G., Die Bedeutung des Pflegeplans für die Qualitätssicherung in der Pflege. Agnes Karl Institut für Pflegeforschung, Editor. Forschungsbericht 261: Meckenheim, Bundesministerium für Gesundheit, 1996.
Klapper, B., Schaeffer, D., Lecher. S., and Koch, U., Communication and cooperation between physicians, nurses and patients. Pflege Aktuell 55(2):74–77, 2001.
McElroy, A., Corben, V., and McLeish, K., Developing care plan documentation: An action research project. J. Nurs. Manage. 3(4):193–199, 1995.
O’Connell, B., Myers, H., Twigg, D., and Entriken, F., Documenting and communicating patient care: Are nursing care plans redundant? Int. J. Nurs. Pract. 6:276–280, 2000.
Allan, J., and Englebright, J., Patient-centered documentation: An effective and efficient use of clinical information systems. J. Nurs. Adm. 30(2):90–95, 2000.
Bussing, A., and Herbig, B., Recent developments of care information systems in Germany. Comput. Nurs. 16(6):307–310, 1998.
Goossen, W. T., Epping, P. J., and Dassen, T., Criteria for nursing information systems as a component of the electronic patient record. An international Delphi study. Comput. Nurs. 15(6):307–315, 1997.
Harris, B. L., Becoming deprofessionalized: One aspect of the staff nurse’s perspective on computer-mediated nursing care plans. Adv. Nurs. Sci. 13(2):63–74, 1990.
Larrabee, J. H., Boldreghini, S., Elder-Sorrells, K., Turner, Z. M., Wender, R. G., and Hart, J. M. et al., Evaluation of documentation before and after implementation of a nursing information system in an acute care hospital. Comput. Nurs. 19(2):56–65, 2001.
Nahm, R., and Poston, I., Measurement of the effects of an integrated, point-of-care computer system on quality of nursing documentation and patient satisfaction. Comput. Nurs. 18(5):220–229, 2000.
Sahlstedt, S., Adolfsson, H., Ehnfors, M., and Kallstrom, B., Nursing process documentation–effects on workload and quality when using a computer program and a key word model for nursing documentation. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 46:330–336, 1997.
Ammenwerth, E., Mansmann, U., Iller, C., and Eichstadter, R., Factors affecting and affected by user acceptance of computer-based nursing documentation: Results of a two-year study. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 10(1):69–84, 2003.
Ellenbecker, C. H., and Shea, K., Documentation in home health care practice. Evidence of quality care. Nurs. Clin. North Am. 29(3):495–506, 1994.
Mahler, C., Ammenwerth, E., Hoppe, B., Eichstadter, R., Tautz, A., and Wagner, A., Qualitätsverbesserung durch PIK? Pflegezeitschrift 54(12):877–881, 2001.
Ammenwerth, E., Kutscha, A., Eichstadter, R., and Haux, R., Systematic evaluation of computer-based nursing documentation. Medinfo 10(Pt 2):1102–1106, 2001.
Ammenwerth, E., Eichstadter, R., Haux, R., Pohl, U., Rebel, S., and Ziegler, S., A randomized evaluation of a computer-based nursing documentation system. Methods Inf. Med. 40(2):61–68, 2001.
Bjorvell, C., Wredling, R., and Thorell-Ekstrand, I., Long-term increase in quality of nursing documentation: Effects of a comprehensive intervention. Scand. J. Caring Sci. 16(1):34–42, 2002.
Ammenwerth, E., Iller, C., and Mahler, C., IT-adoption and the interaction of task, technology and individuals: A fit framework and a case study. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 6:3, 2006.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank a number of people for their help during this long term project. Without their cooperation, the realization of such a large undertaking would not have been possible: Friedrich Fellhauer, Ulrich Mansmann, Petra Spies, Katrin Schroedelsecker, Marianne Kandert and Gisela Luther. Many thanks also to Joachim Klink for linguistic support on this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mahler, C., Ammenwerth, E., Wagner, A. et al. Effects of a Computer-based Nursing Documentation System on the Quality of Nursing Documentation. J Med Syst 31, 274–282 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-007-9065-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-007-9065-0