Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Spatial Fuzzy C Means and Expectation Maximization Algorithms with Bias Correction for Segmentation of MR Brain Images

  • Image & Signal Processing
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Fuzzy C Means (FCM) and Expectation Maximization (EM) algorithms are the most prevalent methods for automatic segmentation of MR brain images into three classes Gray Matter (GM), White Matter (WM) and Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF). The major difficulties associated with these conventional methods for MR brain image segmentation are the Intensity Non-uniformity (INU) and noise. In this paper, EM and FCM with spatial information and bias correction are proposed to overcome these effects. The spatial information is incorporated by convolving the posterior probability during E-Step of the EM algorithm with mean filter. Also, a method of pixel re-labeling is included to improve the segmentation accuracy. The proposed method is validated by extensive experiments on both simulated and real brain images from standard database. Quantitative and qualitative results depict that the method is superior to the conventional methods by around 25% and over the state-of-the art method by 8%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yazdani, S., Yusof, R., Karimian, A., Pashna, M., and Hematian, A., Image segmentation methods and applications in MRI brain images. IETE Tech. Rev. 32:413–427, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pham, D.L., Xu, C., and Prince, J.L., Current methods in medical image segmentation. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2:315–337, 2000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Liew, A. W.-C., Yan, H., Current methods in the automatic tissue segmentation of 3D magnetic resonance brain images. Curr. Med. Imaging Rev. 2006.

  4. Van Leemput, K., Maes, F., Vandermeulen, D., and Suetens, P., A unifying framework for partial volume segmentation of brain MR images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 22(1):105–119, 2003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nguyen, T.M., and Wu, Q.M.J., Gaussian-mixture-model-based spatial neighborhood relationships for pixel labeling problem. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 42(1):193–202, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Balafar, M.A., Spatial based expectation maximizing (EM). Diagn. Pathol. 6:103, 2011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Balafar, M.A., Gaussian mixture model based segmentation methods for brain MRI images. Artif. Intell. Rev. 41(3):429–439, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Xie, M., Gao, J., Zhu, C., and Zhou, Y., A modified method for MRF segmentation and bias correction of MR image with intensity inhomogeneity. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 53(1):23–35, 2015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Greenspan, H., Ruf, A., and Goldberger, J., Constrained gaussian mixture model framework for auotmatic segmentation of MR brain images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 25(9):1233–1245, 2006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee, J.-D., Su, H.-R., Cheng, P.E., Liou, M., Aston, J.A.D., Tsai, A.C., and Chen, C.-Y., MR image segmentation using a power transformation approach. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 28(6):894–905, 2009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Siyal, M.Y., and Yu, L., An intelligent modified fuzzy, c-means based algorithm for bias estimation and segmentation of brain MRI. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 26:2052–2062, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mekhmoukh, A., and Mokrani, K., Improved fuzzy C-means based particle swarm optimization (PSO) initialization and outlierrejection with level set methods for MR brainimage segmentation. Comput. Methods Prog. Biomed. 122(2):266–281, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang, X., Wang, G., Su, Q., Guo, Q., Zhang, C., and Chen, B., An improved fuzzy algorithm for image segmentation using peak detection, spatial information and reallocation. Soft Computing:1–9, 2015.

  14. Zhao, F., Fan, J., and Liu, H., Optimal-selection-based suppressed fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm with self-tuning non local spatial information for image segmentation. Expert Systems with Applications. 41:4083–4093, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ji, Z., Liu, J., Cao, G., Sun, Q., and Chen, Q., Robust spatially constrained fuzzy c-means algorithm for brain MR image segmentation. Pattern Recogn. 47:2454–2466, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Madhukumar, S., and Santhiyakumari, N., Evaluation of k-means and fuzzy C-means segmentation of MR images of brain. Egypt. J. Radiol. Nucl. Med. 46:475–479, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang, J., Jiang, W., Wang, R., Wang, L., and Brain, M.R., Image segmentation with spatial constrained K-mean algorithm and dual-tree complex wavelet transform. J. Med. Syst. 38:93, 2014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ali, H., Elmogy, M., El-Daydamony, E., Atwan, A., and Multi-resolution, M.R.I., Brain image segmentation based on morphological pyramid and fuzzy C-mean clustering. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 40(11):3173–3185, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen, Z., Wang, J., Kong, D., and Dong, F., A nonlocal energy minimization approach to brain image segmentation with simultaneous bias field estimation and denoising. Mach. Vis. Appl. 25:529–544, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Taherdangkoo, M., Bagheri, M.H., Yazdi, M., and Andriole, K.P., An effective method for segmentation of MR brain images using the ant colony optimization algorithm. J. Digit. Imaging. 26:1116–1123, 2013.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Huang, C., and Zeng, L., An active contour model for the segmentation of images with intensity inhomogeneities and bias field estimation. PLoS One. 10(4):e0120399, 2015.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Li, X., Jiang, D., Shi, Y., and Li, W., Segmentation of MR image using local and global region based geodesic model. BioMed. Eng. OnLine. 14:8, 2015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Prakash, R. M., Kumari, R. S. S., Gaussian mixture model with the inclusion of spatial factor and pixel re-labelling: Application to MR brain image segmentation. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2016.

  24. Prakash, R.M., and Kumari, R.S.S., Fuzzy C means integrated with spatial information and contrast enhancement for segmentation of MR brain images. Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol. 26(2):116–123, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bishop, C.M., Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer, New York, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dempster, A.P., Laird, N.M., and Rubin, D.B., Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J. R. Stat. Soc. 39:1–38, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Carson, C., Belongie, S., Greenspan, H., and Malik, J., Blobworld: image segmentation using expectation-maximization and its application to image querying. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 24(8):1026–1038.

  28. Bezdek, J., Pattern recognition with fuzzy objective function algorithms. Plenum, New York, 1981.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Dunn, J., A fuzzy relative of the ISODATA process and its use in detecting compact, well-separated clusters. J. Cybern. 3:32–57, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Meena Prakash.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Image & Signal Processing

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meena Prakash, R., Shantha Selva Kumari, R. Spatial Fuzzy C Means and Expectation Maximization Algorithms with Bias Correction for Segmentation of MR Brain Images. J Med Syst 41, 15 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-016-0662-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-016-0662-7

Keywords

Navigation