Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Supporting Emergency Medical Care Teams with an Integrated Status Display Providing Real-Time Access to Medical Best Practices, Workflow Tracking, and Patient Data

  • Systems-Level Quality Improvement
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The work of a hospital’s medical staff is safety critical and often occurs under severe time constraints. To provide timely and effective cognitive support to medical teams working in such contexts, guidelines in the form of best practice workflows for healthcare have been developed by medical organizations. However, the high cognitive load imposed in such stressful and rapidly changing environments poses significant challenges to the medical staff or team in adhering to these workflows. In collaboration with physicians and nurses from Carle Foundation Hospital, we first studied and modeled medical team’s individual responsibilities and interactions in cardiac arrest resuscitation and decomposed their overall task into a set of distinct cognitive tasks that must be specifically supported to achieve successful human-centered system design. We then developed a medical Best Practice Guidance (BPG) system for reducing medical teams’ cognitive load, thus fostering real-time adherence to best practices. We evaluated the resulting system with physicians and nurses using a professional patient simulator used for medical training and certification. The evaluation results point to a reduction of cognitive load and enhanced adherence to medical best practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Cardiac arrest is a sudden stop in effective blood circulation due to abrupt loss of heart function.

  2. http://www.laerdal.com/us/SimMan3G

  3. Giving sodium bicarbonate without providing adequate ventilation to the patient may further worsen acidosis.

  4. Code 99 is an emergent situation where the patient is not breathing and/or has no pulse.

  5. IV or IO infusion is to infuse fluid or medication directly into the patient’s vein or marrow.

  6. https://www.onlineaha.org/system/scidea/courses/15/more_info/90-1405_HC_ACLS.pdf

  7. Confirmation bias is a tendency to search for or interpret information in a way that confirms one’s preconceptions, leading to statistical errors [27].

  8. http://www3.gehealthcare.com/en/products/categories/patient_monitoring/patient_monitors/carescape_monitor_b850

  9. https://www.philips.com.au/healthcare/product/HC866066/intellivue-mx550-patient-monitor.html

References

  1. Bisantz, A. M., Fairbanks, R. J., and Burns, C. M.: Cognitive engineering for better health care systems. Cognitive Syst. Eng. Health Care 1, 2014

  2. Lee, J. D., Kirlik, A., and Dainoff, M.: The Oxford handbook of cognitive engineering. Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2013

  3. Munir, S., Stankovic, J. A., Liang, C. -J. M., and Lin, S.: Cyber physical system challenges for human-in-the-loop control. In: Presented as part of the 8th International Workshop on Feedback Computing. Berkeley, CA, 2013

  4. Kirlik, A., and Muruyama, S., Human-technology interaction and music perception and performance: toward the robust design of sociotechnical systems. Proc. IEEE 92(4):616–631, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kirlik, A., Ackerman, K., Seefeldt, B., Xargay, E., Talleur, D., Carbonari, R., Hovakimyan, N., and Sha, L.: Inverting the human/automation equation to support situation awareness and prevent loss of control. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Aviation Psychology. IEEE, 2015

  6. Ahmed, A., Chandra, S., Herasevich, V., Gajic, O., and Pickering, B. W., The effect of two different electronic health record user interfaces on intensive care provider task load, errors of cognition, and performance*. Crit. Care Med. 39(7):1626–1634, 2011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Manor-Shulman, O., Beyene, J., Frndova, H., and Parshuram, C. S., Quantifying the volume of documented clinical information in critical illness. J. Crit. Care 23(2):245–250, 2008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Grimshaw, J. M., and Russell, I. T., Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: A systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet 342(8883):1317–1322, 1993.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. McKinley, B. A., Moore, L. J., Sucher, J. F., Todd, S. R., Turner, K. L., Valdivia, A., Sailors, R. M., and Moore, F. A., Computer protocol facilitates evidence-based care of sepsis in the surgical intensive care unit. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 70(5):1153–1167, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Strzyzewski, N., Common errors made in resuscitation of respiratory and cardiac arrest. Plast. Surg. Nurs. 26(1):10–14, 2006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kohn, L. T., Corrigan, J. M., Donaldson, M. S., et al.: To err is human: building a safer health system. National Academies Press: Washington, D.C., p. 627, 2000

  12. Paul, S. A., and Reddy, M. C.: Understanding together: sensemaking in collaborative information seeking. In: Proceedings of the conference on Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW’10), pp. 321–330. ACM, 2010

  13. Kusunoki, D. S., Sarcevic, A., Zhang, Z., and Burd, R. S.: Understanding visual attention of teams in dynamic medical settings through vital signs monitor use. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW’13). http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441836, pp. 527–540. ACM, 2013

  14. Beyer, H., and Holtzblatt, K.: Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems. Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1997

  15. Wu, P. -L., Nam, M. -Y., Choi, J., Kirlik, A., Sha, L., and Berlin, R.: Medical best practice guidance, navigation and control (GN&C) system for supporting situation awareness, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Tech. Rep. https://uofi.box.com/s/cjr5ocr4u4kl17dj4iw6to91u47codkt, 2015

  16. Field, J. M., Hazinski, M. F., Sayre, M. R., Chameides, L., Schexnayder, S. M., Hemphill, R., Samson, R. A., Kattwinkel, J., Berg, R. A., Bhanji, F., et al., Part 1: executive summary 2010 american heart association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 122 (18):suppl 3, S640–S656, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Goldman, J., Whitehead, S., Weininger, S., and Rockville, M., Eliciting clinical requirements for the medical device plug-and-play (MD PnP) interoperability program. Anesth. Analg. 102:S1–54, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Easdown, L. J., Banerjee, A., and Weinger, M.: Simulation to assess human responses to critical events. In: Lee, J. D., Kirlik, A., and Dainoff, M. (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Engineering. Oxford University Press, 2013

  19. Hazinski, M. F., Chameides, L., Hemphill, R., and Samson, R.: Highlights of the 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for cpr and ecc. American Heart Association: Dallas, 2010

  20. Wu, P. -L., Kang, W., Al-Nayeem, A., Sha, L., Berlin, JrR. B., and Goldman, J. M.: A low complexity coordination architecture for networked supervisory medical systems. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE ICCPS, pp. 89–98. ACM, 2013

  21. Wu, P. -L., Raguraman, D., Sha, L., Berlin, R. B., and Goldman, J. M.: A treatment validation protocol for cyber-physical-human medical systems. In: 2014 EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA), p. 2014. IEEE, 2014

  22. Wu, P. -L., Sha, L., Berlin, R. B., and Goldman, J. M.: Safe workflow adaptation and validation protocol for medical cyber-physical. In: 2015 EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA), p. 2015. IEEE , 2015

  23. Neuman, M. D., Goldstein, J. N., Cirullo, M. A., and Schwartz, J. S., Durability of class i american college of cardiology/american heart association clinical practice guideline recommendations. JAMA 311(20):2092–2100, 2014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Wayne, D. B., Didwania, A., Feinglass, J., Fudala, M. J., Barsuk, J. H., and McGaghie, W. C., Simulation-based education improves quality of care during cardiac arrest team responses at an academic teaching hospital: a case-control study. Chest J 133(1):56–61, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Klijn, C. J., and Hankey, G. J., Management of acute ischaemic stroke: new guidelines from the american stroke association and european stroke initiative. Lancet Neurol. 2(11):698–701, 2003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hart, S. G., and Staveland, L. E., Development of nasa-tlx (task load index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Adv. Psychobiol. 52:139–183, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nickerson, R. S., Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 2(2):175, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Fitzpatrick, G., and Ellingsen, G., A review of 25 years of cscw research in healthcare: Contributions, challenges and future agendas. Comput. Supported Coop. Work 22(4-6):609–665, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-012-9168-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bossen, C., and Jensen, L. G.: How physicians ’achieve overview’: A case-based study in a hospital ward. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW’14). https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531620 https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531620, pp. 257–268. ACM, 2014

  30. Berg, M., Accumulating and coordinating: occasions for information technologies in medical work. Computer supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 8(4):373–401, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008757115404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Song, X., Hwong, B., Matos, G., Rudorfer, A., Nelson, C., Han, M., and Girenkov, A.: Understanding requirements for computer-aided healthcare workflows: experiences and challenges. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE’06), pp. 930–934. ACM, 2006

  32. Wang, J., Emergency healthcare workflow modeling and timeliness analysis. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. Hum. 42(6):1323–1331, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Bossen, C.: Representations at work: A national standard for electronic health records. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW’06). https://doi.org/10.1145/1180875.1180887, pp. 69–78. ACM, 2006

  34. Hartswood, M., Procter, R., Rouncefield, M., and Slack, R., Making a case in medical work: implications for the electronic medical record. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 12(3):241–266, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Jiancaro, T., Jamieson, G. A., and Mihailidis, A., Twenty years of cognitive work analysis in health care: a scoping review. J. Cognitive Eng. Dec. Making 8(1):3–22, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. MacIntyre, B., Mynatt, E. D., Voida, S., Hansen, K. M., Tullio, J., and Corso, G. M.: Support for multitasking and background awareness using interactive peripheral displays. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1145/502348.502355, pp. 41–50. ACM, 2001

  37. Iserson, K. V., and Moskop, J. C., Triage in medicine, part i: Concept, history, and types. Ann. Emerg. Med. 49(3):275–281, 2007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Travers, D. A., Waller, A. E., Bowling, J. M., Flowers, D., and Tintinalli, J., Five-level triage system more effective than three-level in tertiary emergency department. J. Emerg. Nurs. 28(5):395–400, 2002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Garg, A. X., Adhikari, N. K., McDonald, H., Rosas-Arellano, M. P., Devereaux, P., Beyene, J., Sam, J., and Haynes, R. B., Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: A systematic review. Jama 293(10):1223–1238, 2005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kawamoto, K., Houlihan, C. A., Balas, E. A., and Lobach, D. F., Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: A systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. Bmj 330(7494): 765, 2005.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Power, D. J.: A brief history of decision support systems, DSSResources. COM, World Wide Web, http://DSSResources.COM/history/dsshistory.html, version, vol. 4, 2007

  42. Yan, H., Jiang, Y., Zheng, J., Peng, C., and Li, Q., A multilayer perceptron-based medical decision support system for heart disease diagnosis. Expert Syst. Appl. 30(2):272–281, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Tate, A. R., Underwood, J., Acosta, D. M., Julià-Sapé, M., Majós, C., Moreno-Torres, À., Howe, F. A., Van Der Graaf, M., Lefournier, V., Murphy, M. M., et al., Development of a decision support system for diagnosis and grading of brain tumours using in vivo magnetic resonance single voxel spectra. NMR Biomed. 19(4):411–434, 2006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Wolfstadt, J. I., Gurwitz, J. H., Field, T. S., Lee, M., Kalkar, S., Wu, W., and Rochon, P. A., The effect of computerized physician order entry with clinical decision support on the rates of adverse drug events: A systematic review. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 23(4):451–458, 2008.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Kuperman, G. J., Bobb, A., Payne, T. H., Avery, A. J., Gandhi, T. K., Burns, G., Classen, D. C., and Bates, D. W., Medication-related clinical decision support in computerized provider order entry systems: A review. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 14(1):29–40, 2007.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Fuerch, J. H., Yamada, N. K., Coelho, P. R., Lee, H. C., and Halamek, L. P., Impact of a novel decision support tool on adherence to neonatal resuscitation program algorithm. Resuscitation 88:52–56, 2015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kooij, F. O., Klok, T., Hollmann, M. W., and Kal, J. E., Decision support increases guideline adherence for prescribing postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis. Anesth. Analg. 106(3):893–898, 2008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Eichner, J. S., Das, M., et al.: Challenges and barriers to clinical decision support (CDS) design and implementation experienced in the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality CDS demonstrations Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Rockville, 2010

  49. Sittig, D. F., Wright, A., Osheroff, J. A., Middleton, B., Teich, J. M., Ash, J. S., Campbell, E., and Bates, D. W., Grand challenges in clinical decision support. J. Biomed. Inform. 41(2):387–392, 2008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Sartipi, K., Archer, N. P., and Yarmand, M. H.: Challenges in developing effective clinical decision support systems. In: Efficient Decision Support Systems-Practice and Challenges in Biomedical Related Domain. InTech, 2011

  51. Hudson, D. L.: Medical expert systems, Wiley Encyclopedia of Biomedical Engineering, 2006

  52. Tsumoto, S., and Tanaka, H.: Automated discovery of medical expert system rules from clinical databases based on rough sets. In: KDD, pp. 63–69, 1996

  53. Hudson, D. L., and Cohen, M. E., Fuzzy logic in medical expert systems. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 13 (5):693–698, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Andreassen, S., Jensen, F. V., and Olesen, K. G., Medical expert systems based on causal probabilistic networks. Int. J. Biomed. Comput. 28(1):1–30, 1991.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Szolovits, P., Patil, R. S., and Schwartz, W. B., Artificial intelligence in medical diagnosis. Ann. Intern. Med. 108(1):80–87, 1988.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work is funded by NSF (CNS 13-30077 and CNS 13-29886).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to PoLiang Wu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

Conflict of Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Systems-Level Quality Improvement

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, P., Nam, MY., Choi, J. et al. Supporting Emergency Medical Care Teams with an Integrated Status Display Providing Real-Time Access to Medical Best Practices, Workflow Tracking, and Patient Data. J Med Syst 41, 186 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-017-0829-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-017-0829-x

Keywords

Navigation