Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Tri- State Filter for the Removal of Salt and Pepper Noise in Mammogram Images

  • Image & Signal Processing
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new algorithm which uses tree based decision and tri-state non linear values to eliminate high density outlier noise in mammogram images is proposed. The proposed algorithm uses the number of non noisy pixels in the current processing vicinity as values in the decision tree. Tri-state values such as unsymmetrical truncated median or modified Winsorized mean or midpoint replaces the corrupted pixel based on the decision tree in the current processing kernel. The algorithm exhibits good PSNR, IEF, low MSE and High structural preservation property even after removing high density noise. The performance of the proposed algorithm was also found good visually. The Key aspect of the work is the combination of tree based decision and tri-state non linear values which preserves the information content of images that are required for further processing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

DBA:

Decision based algorithm

SPN:

Salt and pepper noise removal

PSNR:

Peak signal to noise ratio

MSE:

Mean square error

IEF:

Image enhancement factor

SSIM:

Structural similarity index metric

SMF:

Standard median filter

AMF:

Adaptive median filter

PSMF:

Progressive switched median filter

IDBA:

Improved decision based median filter

CUTMF:

Cascaded unsymmetrical trimmed median filter

CUTMPF:

Cascaded unsymmetrical trimmed midpoint filter

MDBUTMF:

Modified decision based unsymmetrical trimmed median filter

DBUTMPF:

Decision based unsymmetrical trimmed midpoint filter

DBSIF:

Decision based spline interpolation filter

TSF:

Trisate filter (proposed algorithm)

X:

Probability density function

Sa,b :

Corresponding pixel of the noisy image

K(a,b):

Current processing pixel

S1(a,b):

Array holding sorted pixels of current processing window

MXN:

Size of the image

x:

Original image

y:

Restored image

n:

Corrupted image

count:

Number of non noisy pixels in the current processing window

μx:

Average of the original image

μy:

Average of the restored image

L:

Dynamic range of pixel value

σx:

Standard deviation of the original image

σy:

Standard deviation of the restored image

i:

Kernel size of original image

j:

Kernal size of the restored image

References

  1. Meenakshi Sundaram, K. , Sasikala, D. , Aarthi Rani, P., A study on preprocessing a mammogram image using adaptive median filter. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology. 3(3), 2014.

  2. Hussein, Z. R., Rahmat, R. W., Nurliyana, L., Saripan, M. I., and Dimon, M. Z., Pre-processing Importance for Extracting Contours from Noisy Echocardiographic Images. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security (IJCSNS) 9(3):134–137, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lai, S., Li, X., and Bischof, W., On techniques for detecting circumscribed masses in mammograms. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 8:377–386, 1995 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hwang, H., and Haddad, R. A., Adaptive median filters: new algorithms and results. IEEE Transaction on Image Processing 4:499–502.

  5. Brownrigg, D. R. K., The weighted median filter. Commun. ACM 27(8):807–818, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. KO, S. J., and Lee, Y. H., Center weighted median filters and their application to image enhancement. IEEE Transactions on Circuits Systems 38(9):984–993, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, T., and Ma, K., Tri-state median filter for image de-noising. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 8(12):1834–1837, 1999.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, Z., and Zhang, D., Progressive switching median filter for removal of impulse noise from highly corrupted images. IEEE Transactions on Circuits Systems-II 46:78–80, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Srinivasan, K. S., and Ebenezer, D., A New Fast and Efficient Decision-Based Algorithm for removal of high-density Impulse noises. IEEE Signal Processing Letters 14(3):189–192, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Madhu, S., Nair, R. K., Tatavarti, R., An Improved Decision Based Algorithm for impulse noise removal”, Proceedings in Congress on Image and Signal Processing, pp. 426–431, 2008.

  11. Balasubramanian, S., Kalishwaran, S., Muthuraj, R., Ebenezer, D., and Jayaraj, V., An efficient Non linear cascade filtering algorithm for removal of high density salt and pepper noise in image and video sequence. Proceedings in International Conference on control, Automation, communication and Energy Conservation, Pages 1–6, 2009.

  12. Esakkirajan, S., Veerakumar, T., Subramanyam, A. N., and Prem Chand, C. H., Removal of high density Salt and pepper noise through modified decision based Unsymmetrical trimmed median filter. IEEE Signal Processing Letters 18(5):287–290, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Vasanth, K., and Jawahar Senthil Kumar, V., A Decision Based Unsymmetrical Trimmed Mid Point Algorithm for the removal of high Density Salt and pepper noise. Journal of Applied Theoretical and Information Technology 42(2):553–563, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vasanth, K., and Jawahar Senthil Kumar, V., A Decision Based Neighborhood referred unsymmetrical trimmed variants filter for the removal of salt and pepper noise in images and videos. International Journal of Signal, Vision and Video Processing, Springer 9(8):1833–1841, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Syamala Jayasree, P., Raj, P., Kumar, P., Siddavatam, R., and Ghrera, S. P., A fast novel algorithm for salt and pepper image noise cancellation using cardinal B-splines. International Journal of Signal Image and Video Processing, Springer 7(6):1145–1157, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bai, T., Tan, J., Hu, M., and Wang, Y., A novel algorithm for removal of salt and pepper noise using continued fractions interpolation. Signal Process. 102:247–255, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Abdel-Basset, M., Gu, M., Mohamed, M., and Chilamkurti, N., A framework for risk assessment, management and evaluation: Economic tool for quantifying risks in supply chain. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 90:489–502, 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Abdel-Basset, M., Manogaran, G., Gamal, A., and Smarandache, F., A hybrid approach of neutrosophic sets and DEMATEL method for developing supplier selection criteria. Design Automation for Embedded Systems. 1–22, 2018.

  19. Basset, M., Manogaran, G., Mohamed, M., and Rushdy, E. Internet of things in smart education environment: Supportive framework in the decision-making process. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, e4515, 2018.

  20. Abdel-Basset, M., El-Shahat, D., and Mirjalili, S., A hybrid whale optimization algorithm based on local search strategy for the permutation flow shop scheduling problem. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 85:129–145, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kumar, P. M., Devi, U., Manogaran, G., Sundarasekar, R., Chilamkurti, N., and Varatharajan, R., Ant colony optimization algorithm with Internet of Vehicles for intelligent traffic control system. Comput. Netw. 144:154–162, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kumar, P. M., and Gandhi, U. D., A novel three-tier Internet of Things architecture with machine learning algorithm for early detection of heart diseases. Comput. Electr. Eng. 65:222–235, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kumar, P. M., Lokesh, S., Varatharajan, R., Babu, G. C., and Parthasarathy, P., Cloud and IoT based disease prediction and diagnosis system for healthcare using Fuzzy neural classifier. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 86:527–534, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kumar, P. M., and Gandhi, U. D., Enhanced DTLS with CoAP-based authentication scheme for the internet of things in healthcare application. The Journal of Supercomputing. 1–21, 2017.

  25. Priyan, M. K., and Devi, G. U., Energy efficient node selection algorithm based on node performance index and random waypoint mobility model in internet of vehicles. Cluster Computing. 1–15, 2017.

  26. Manogaran, G., Varatharajan, R., Lopez, D., Kumar, P. M., Sundarasekar, R., and Thota, C., A new architecture of Internet of Things and big data ecosystem for secured smart healthcare monitoring and alerting system. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 82:375–387, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fakhry, M.M.G., A. E., and El-Henawy, I., 2-Levels of clustering strategy to detect and locate copy-move forgery in digital images. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 1–19, 2018.

  28. Abdel M., & Mohamed, M., Internet of Things (IoT) and its Impact on supply chain: A framework for building smart, secure and efficient systems. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2018.

  29. Vasanth, K., Manjunath, T. G., and Nirmal Raj, S., A Decision Based Unsymmetrical Trimmed Modified Winsorized Mean Filter for the Removal of High Density Salt and Pepper Noise in Images and Videos. International Conference on Image and Signal Processing, ICISP 2015, Procedia in Computer Science 54:595–604, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  30. http://peipa.essex.ac.uk/info/mias.html [accessed on 7 july 2017], 2017.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Varatharajan Ramachandran.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Varatharajan declares that he has no conflict of interest. Vasanth Kishorebabu declares that he/she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

Articles do not contain studies with human participants or animals by any of the authors. Images used in the work are stored in database given in website given in reference 30.The images used in the database can be used for research.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Image & Signal Processing

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramachandran, V., Kishorebabu, V. A Tri- State Filter for the Removal of Salt and Pepper Noise in Mammogram Images. J Med Syst 43, 40 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-018-1133-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-018-1133-0

Keywords

Navigation