Abstract
Belgium is in a transition phase from paper-based prescriptions to electronic prescriptions (ePrescriptions) during which both the paper and electronic format are valid. Since patients still get a paper proof of the ePrescription, sometimes pharmacists use the ePrescription as paper-based prescription. When the government demands a complete dematerialization, i.e. no more paper-based prescriptions, this will no longer be possible. Therefore, we questioned the frequency and reasons for treating an ePrescription as paper-based. The logged interactions in the national database were used to identify possible reasons. The tarification service Koninklijk Limburgs Apothekers Verbond (KLAV) provided prescriptions of June 2018. KLAV supports tarification for community pharmacies all over Belgium, thereby providing a representative sample for the Belgian community pharmacies. A two-stage cluster random sampling technique was applied to retrieve a subset of 10,000 prescriptions. In this subset we identified 4961 ePrescriptions (49.61%) of which 226 (4.56%, in total 2.26%) were treated as paper-based. Reasons observed for this incorrect handling are (1) non-compliance of the community pharmacist; (2) errors in software or handling of the community pharmacist; (3) errors at the prescriber side or patient tries to fraud; (4) incorrectly revoking the ePrescription; and (5) errors in software of prescriber. The main reasons for treating ePrescriptions as paper-based are non-compliance of the community pharmacist (n = 124, 54.87%) by ignoring its digital nature, and errors in software or handling of the community pharmacist (n = 85, 37.61%). Future research is necessary to investigate user opinions and to measure the impact of introducing ePrescribing in the daily routine.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The type extended delivery contains a (or multiple) product(s) that were not in stock when the patient visited the community pharmacy. The patient then receives a paper specifying the necessary products for which the delivery was extended in that pharmacy. The community pharmacist is obliged to indicate a reference to the original prescription (ePrescription or paper-based prescription). The validity period of the original prescription remains.
References
eHealth Initiative Foundation (eHI), A clinician's guide to electronic prescribing. CIMM Publishing, 2008. https://www.thecimm.org/PDF/Clinician's_Guide_to_e-Prescribing_Final_100708.pdf. Accessed 1 August 2019
Esmaeil Zadeh, P., and Tremblay, M. C., A review of the literature and proposed classification on e-prescribing: Functions, assimilation stages, benefits, concerns, and risks. Res. Soc. Adm. Pharm. 12(1):1–19, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2015.03.001.
Kierkegaard, P., E-prescriptions across Europe. Heal. Technol. 3(3):205–219, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-012-0037-0.
Pottegård, A., Schmidt, S. A. J., Wallach-Kildemoes, H., Sørensen, H. T., Hallas, J., and Schmidt, M., Data Resource Profile: The Danish National Prescription Registry. Int. J. Epidemiol. 46(3):798–798f, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw213.
Kauppinen, H., Ahonen, R., Mantyselka, P., and Timonen, J., Medication safety and the usability of electronic prescribing as perceived by physicians-A semistructured interview among primary health care physicians in Finland. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 23(6):1187–1194, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12759.
Ekedahl, A., Problem prescriptions in Sweden necessitating contact with the prescriber before dispensing. Res. Soc. Adm. Pharm. 6(3):174–184, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2009.09.001.
Samadbeik, M., Ahmadi, M., Sadoughi, F., and Garavand, A., A Comparative Review of Electronic Prescription Systems: Lessons Learned from Developed Countries. J Res Pharm Pract 6(1):3–11, 2017. https://doi.org/10.4103/2279-042X.200993.
Laius, O., Pisarev, H., Volmer, D., Koks, S., Martson, A., and Maasalu, K., Use of a national database as a tool to identify primary medication non-adherence: The Estonian ePrescription system. Res. Soc. Adm. Pharm. 14(8):776–783, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2017.10.003.
Bruthans, J., The past and current state of the Czech outpatient electronic prescription (eRecept). Int. J. Med. Inform. 123:49–53, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.01.003.
Nyssen M, Putzeys T, Baert L, Buckens M, Recip-e: The Electronic Prescription System for Ambulatory Care in Belgium. The International Conference on Health Informatics (ICHI 2013), Vilamoura, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03005-0_5
Nyssen, M., and Buckens, M., Deployment of Electronic Prescriptions in Belgium. Lisbon: The Seventh International Conference on eHealth, Telemedicine, and Social Medicine (eTELEMED 2015), 2015.
Suykerbuyk, L., Robbrecht, M., De Belder, S., Bastiaens, H., Martinet, W., and De Loof, H., Patient Perceptions of Electronic Prescriptions in Belgium: An Exploratory Policy Analysis. Pharmacy Comm 6(4):130, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy6040130.
Sirius Insights, Aantal apotheken in België, 2017. http://siriusinsight.be/nl/whitepaper-nl/spreiding-apotheken. Accessed 1 August 2019
De Proot, D., Meer dan 4.000 apothekers in besloten Facebookgroep. de Apotheker, 2017. http://www.deapotheker.be/actualiteit/meer-dan-4-000-apothekers-in-besloten-facebookgroep/article-normal-29849.html. Accessed 1 August 2019
eGezondheid, eHealth platform technical incidents, 2018. eHealth Platform België. https://www.ehealth.fgov.be/nl/news/patients/2018/06. Accessed 1 August 2019
Jariwala, K. S., Holmes, E. R., Banahan, 3rd, B. F., and McCaffrey, 3rd, D. J., Adoption of and experience with e-prescribing by primary care physicians. Res. Soc. Adm. Pharm. 9(1):120–128, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2012.04.003.
Irani, Z., Weerakkody, V., Molnar, A., Lee, H., Hindi, N., and Osman, I., A user satisfaction study of the NHS Online Prescription Prepayment Certificate. Health Policy Technol 3(3):176–184, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2014.05.003.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the ethical committee of UZ Brussels (nr. 2018/218, B.U.N. 143 201 836 461). However, this article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. No informed consent was required therefor.
Informed consent
No informed consent was required therefor.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Transactional Processing Systems
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(PDF 56 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Van Laere, S., Cornu, P., Dreesen, E. et al. Why do Belgian Community Pharmacists Still Treat Electronic Prescriptions as Paper-Based?. J Med Syst 43, 327 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-019-1456-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-019-1456-5