Skip to main content
Log in

Algorithms for the car sequencing and the level scheduling problem

  • Regular Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Scheduling Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper deals with two most important problems arising in sequencing mixed-model assembly lines. One problem is to keep the line's workstations loads as constant as possible (the 'car sequencing problem') while the other is to keep the usage rate of all parts fed into the final assembly as constant as possible (the 'level scheduling problem'). The first problem is a difficult constraint-satisfaction problem while the second requires to optimize a nonlinear objective function. The contribution of this paper is twofold: First, we describe a branching scheme and bounding algorithms for the computation of feasible sequences for the car sequencing problem. Second, we present an algorithm which can optimize a level scheduling objective while taking care of the car sequencing constraints. Computational results are presented which show that feasible sequences can be obtained quickly for large problem instances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bard, J. F., A. Shtub, and S. B. Josh, “Sequencing mixed-model assembly lines to level parts usage and minimize line length,” International Journal of Production Research, 32, 2431–2454 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolat, A., “Efficient methods for sequencing minimum job sets on mixed model assembly lines,” Naval Research Logistics, 44, 419–437 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dincbas, M., H. Simonis, and P. van Hentenryck, “Solving the car-sequencing problem in constraint logic programming,” pp. 290–295, in Proceedings of the European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI-88), München, (1988).

  • Drexl, A. and C. Jordan, “Materialflußorientierte Produktionssteuerung bei Variantenfließfertigung,” Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 47, 1073–1087 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Drexl, A. and A. Kimms, “Sequencing JIT mixed-model assembly lines under station-load and part-usage constraints,” Management Science, 47, 489–491 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inman, R. R. and R. L. Bulfin, “Sequencing JIT mixed-model assembly lines,” Management Science, 37, 901–904 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. K., C. J. Hyun, and Y. Kim, “Sequencing in mixed model assembly lines: A genetic algorithm approach,” Computers & Operations Research, 23, 1131–1145 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kis, T., “On the complexity of the car sequencing problem,” Operations Research Letters, 32, 331–335 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubiak, W., “Minimizing variation of production rates in just-in-time systems: a survey,” European Journal of Operational Research, 66, 259–271 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubiak, W., S. Sethi, “A note on ‘Level schedules for mixed-model assembly lines in just-in-time production systems',” Management Science, 37, 121–122 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miltenburg, G. J., “Level schedules for mixed-model assembly lines in just-in-time production systems,” Management Science, 35, 192–207 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Monden, Y., Toyota Production System—An Integrated Approach to Just-in-Time. Chapman & Hall, Cheriton House/UK, 3rd edition (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Parello, B. D. “CAR WARS: The (almost) birth of an expert system,” AI Expert, 3, 60–64 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Parello, B. D., W. C. Kabat, and L. Wos, “Job-shop scheduling using automated reasoning: A case study of the car-sequencing problem,” Journal of Automated Reasoning, 2, 1–42 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholl, A. Balancing and Sequencing of Assembly Lines. Physica, Heidelberg, 2. edition, 1999.

  • Steiner, G.and J. S. Yeomans, “Level schedules for mixed-model, just-in-time processes,” Management Science, 39, 728–735 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumichrast, R. T. and E. R. Clayton, “Evaluating sequences for paced, mixed-model assembly lines with JIT component fabrication,” International Journal of Production Research, 34, 3125–3143 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, L.-H. “Mixed-model sequencing to minimize utility work and the risk of conveyor stopping,” Management Science, 41, 485–495 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yano, C. A. and R. M. V. Rachamadugu, “Sequencing to minimize work overload in assembly lines with product options,” Management Science, 37, 572–586 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeramdini, W., H. Aigbedo, and Y. Monden, “Bicriteria sequencing for just-in-time mixed-model assembly lines,” International Journal of Production Research, 38, 3451–3470 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., P. B. Luh, K. Yoneda, T. Kano, and Y. Kyoya, “Mixed-model assembly line scheduling using the Lagrangian relaxation technique,” IIE Transactions, 32, 125–134 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Drexl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Drexl, A., Kimms, A. & Matthießen, L. Algorithms for the car sequencing and the level scheduling problem. J Sched 9, 153–176 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10951-006-7186-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10951-006-7186-9

Keywords

Navigation