Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A New Analysis of Quasianalysis

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigate the conditions under which quasianalysis, i.e., Carnap's method of abstraction in his Aufbau, yields adequate results. In particular, we state both necessary and sufficient conditions for the so-called faithfulness and fullness of quasianalysis, and analyze adequacy as the conjunction of faithfulness and fullness. It is shown that there is no method of (re-)constructing properties from similarity that delivers adequate results in all possible cases, if the same set of individuals is presupposed for properties and for similarity, and if similarity is a relation of finite arity. The theory is applied to various examples, including Russell's construction of temporal instants and Carnap's constitution of the phenomenal counterparts to quality spheres. Our results explain why the former is adequate while the latter is bound to fail.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berge, C.: Graphs and Hypergraphs, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berge, C.: Hypergraphs, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bonaventura: Quaestiones Disputatae de Scientia Christi, Meiner, Hamburg, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carnap, R.: Der logische Aufbau der Welt, 2nd edition, Hamburg, Meiner, 1961. English translation: Carnap, R., The Logical Structure of the World, translated by Rolf George, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clark, A.: Sensory Qualities, Clarendon, Oxford, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Danut, J.: A diagrammatic reconstruction of Carnap's Quasianalysis, Synthese 142/1 (2004), 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dunn, J.M.: A logical framework for the notion of natural property, in J. Earman and J.D. Norton (eds.), The Cosmos of Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, 1997, pp. 458–497.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eberle, R.A.: A construction of quality classes improved upon the Aufbau, in J. Hintikka (ed.), Rudolf Carnap, Logical Empiricist, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1975, pp. 55–73.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Friedman, M.: Reconsidering Logical Positivism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gärdenfors, P.: Conceptual Spaces, MIT, Cambridge, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Goodman, N.: The Structure of Appearance, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Goodman, N.: The significance of Der logische Aufbau der Welt, in P.A. Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, Open Court, La Salle, Illinois, 1963, pp. 545–558.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Goodman, N.: Seven strictures on similarity, in N. Goodman (ed.), Problems and Projects, Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, 1972, pp. 437–446.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Grünbaum, A.: Whitehead's method of extensive abstraction, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science IV(15) (1953), 215–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hazen, A.P. and Humberstone, L.: Similarity relations and the preservation of solidity, Journal of Logic, Language and Information 13 (2004), 25–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hirsch, E.: Dividing Reality, Oxford University Press, New York, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hodkinson, I. and Otto, M.: Finite conformal hypergraph covers and Gaifman cliques in finite structures, Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 9 (2003), 387–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Johnson, R.: A circle theorem, American Mathematical Monthly 23 (1916), 161–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kleinknecht, R.: Quasianalyse und Qualitätsklassen, Grazer Philosophische Studien 11 (1980), 23–43.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kleinknecht, R.: Zeitordnung und Zeitpunkte, Erkenntnis 54 (2001), 55–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Leibniz, G.W.: Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe, Akademie Verlag, Berlin, 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Leitgeb, H.: How to Parry Goodman's ‘Seven Strictures on Similarity,’ in O. Neumaier, C. Sedmak, and M. Zichy (eds.), Gerechtigkeit. Auf der Suche nach einem Gleichgewicht. Proceedings of the Austrian Society for Philosophy Congress 2004, Ontos, Frankfurt, 2005, pp. 364–370.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Leitgeb, H.: How similarities compose, in M. Werning, E. Machery, and G. Schurz (eds.), The Compositionality of Meaning and Content. I. Foundational Issues, Ontos, Frankfurt, 2005, pp. 147–167.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lewis, D.: Policing the Aufbau, Philosophical Studies 20 (1969), 13–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lewis, D.: Counterfactuals, Blackwell, Oxford, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lewis, D.: On the Plurality of Worlds, Blackwell, Oxford, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lewis, D.: New work for a theory of universals, in D.H. Mellor and A. Oliver (eds.), Properties, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1997, pp. 188–227. First appeared in: Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61/4 (1983), pp. 343–377.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lück, U.: Continu'ous time goes by Russell, Preprint series Logic in Philosophy, University of Konstanz, No. 72 (2004).

  29. Mates, B.: The Philosophy of Leibniz. Metaphysics and Language, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Matousek, J.: Lectures on Discrete Geometry, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  31. McKee, T.A. and McMorris, F.R.: Intersection Graph Theory, SIAM, Philadelphia, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mormann, T.: A representational reconstruction of Carnap's quasianalysis, in M. Forbes (ed.), PSA 1994, Vol. 1, 1994, pp. 96–104.

  33. Mormann, T.: Incompatible empirically equivalent theories: A structural explication, Synthese 103 (1995), 203–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mormann, T.: Similarity and continuous quality distributions, The Monist 79/I (1996), 76–88.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mormann, T.: Repräsentation, Struktur, Quasianalyse. Formale Aspekte einer Carnapianische? konstitutionstheorie, in G. Meggle (ed.), Analyomen 2, de Gruyter, Berlin, 1997, pp. 431–438.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mormann, T.: Synthetic geometry and Aufbau, in T. Bonk (ed.), Language, Truth, and Knowledge. Contributions to the Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Moulines, C.U.: La estructura del mundo sensible. Sistemas fenomenalistas, Ariel, Barcelona, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Moulines, C.U.: Making sense of Carnap's Aufbau, Erkenntnis 35 (1991), 263–286.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Moulines, C.U.: Die mathematisierung der erfahrung: Vorgänger zu Carnaps ‘Aufbau,’ Erkenntnis 54 (2001), 105–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Proust, J.: Quasi-analyse et reconstruction logique du monde, Fundamenta Scientiae 3 (1984), 285–303.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Proust, J.: Questions of Form. Logic and the Analytic Proposition from Kant to Carnap, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Quine, W.V.: Natural kinds, in W.V. Quine (ed.), Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, Columbia University Press, New York, 1969, pp. 114–138.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Quine, W.V.: The Roots of Reference, Open Court, La Salle, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Richardson, A.: Carnap's Construction of the World: The Aufbau and the Emergence of Logical Empiricism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Rodriguez-Pereyra, G.: Resemblance Nominalism, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Rodriguez-Pereyra, G.: Resemblance nominalism and the imperfect community, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research LIX/4 (1999), 965–982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Russell, B.: Our Knowledge of the External World, George Allen & Unwin, London, 1961. (This is the reprint of the revised edition from 1926; the first edition appeared in 1914).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Russell, B.: The Analysis of Matter, George Allen & Unwin, London, 1954. (The Analysis of Matter appeared first in 1927).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Russell, B.: On order in time, in B. Russell (ed.), Logic and Knowledge, George Allen & Unwin, London, 1971, pp. 347–363.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Schoch, D.: Dimensional characterization in finite quasi-analysis, Erkenntnis 54 (2001), 121–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Schreider, J.A.: Equality, Resemblance, and Order, Mir, Moscow, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Sperner, E.: Ein Satz über Untermengen einer endlichen Menge, Mathematische Zeitschrift 27 (1928), 544–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Thomason, S.K.: On constructing instants from events, Journal of Philosophical Logic 13 (1984), 85–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. van de Vel, M.L.J.: Theory of Convex Structures, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Williamson, T.: First-order logics for comparative similarity, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 29 (1988), 457–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departments of Philosophy and Mathematics, University of Bristol, 9 Woodland Road, Bristol, BS8 1TB, UK

    Hannes Leitgeb

Authors
  1. Hannes Leitgeb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hannes Leitgeb.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leitgeb, H. A New Analysis of Quasianalysis. J Philos Logic 36, 181–226 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-006-9033-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-006-9033-z

Key words

Search

Navigation