Skip to main content
Log in

SUPERVALUATION FIXED-POINT LOGICS OF TRUTH

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Michael Kremer defines fixed-point logics of truth based on Saul Kripke’s fixed point semantics for languages expressing their own truth concepts. Kremer axiomatizes the strong Kleene fixed-point logic of truth and the weak Kleene fixed-point logic of truth, but leaves the axiomatizability question open for the supervaluation fixed-point logic of truth and its variants. We show that the principal supervaluation fixed point logic of truth, when thought of as consequence relation, is highly complex: it is not even analytic. We also consider variants, engendered by a stronger notion of ‘fixed point’, and by variant supervaluation schemes. A ‘logic’ is often thought of, not as a consequence relation, but as a set of sentences – the sentences true on each interpretation. We axiomatize the supervaluation fixed-point logics so conceived.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Davis, L.: 1979, An alternate formulation of Kripke’s theory of truth, Journal of Philosophical Logic 8, 289–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grover, D.: 1977, Inheritors and paradox, Journal of Philosophy 74, 590–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haack, S.: (1978). Philosophy of logics. Cambridge University Press.

  • Hintikka, K. Jaakko, J.: 1955, Reductions in the theory of types, Acta Philosophica Fennica VIII, 57–115 Fasc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkham, R.: (1992). Theories of truth: A critical introduction. MIT Press.

  • Kremer, M. (1986). Logic and truth, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.

  • Kremer, M.: 1988, Kripke and the logic of truth, Journal of Philosophical Logic 17, 225–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kremer, P., & Kremer, M.: (2003). On some supervaluation-based consequence relations. forthcoming in the Journal of Philosophical Logic.

  • Kripke, S.: 1975, Outline of a theory of truth, Journal of Philosophy 72, 690–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroon, F.: 1984, Steinus on the paradoxes, Theoria 50, 178–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. L., and Woodruff, P. W.: 1975, On representing ‘True-in-L’ in L, Philosophia 5, 217–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGee, V.: (1991). Truth, vagueness and paradox. Hackett Publishing Company.

  • Montague, R.: (1965). Reductions of higher-order logic. in Symposium on the theory of models; proceedings of the 1963 international symposium at Berkeley, 251–264, North Holland.

  • Moschovakis, Y.: (1974). Elementary induction on abstract structures. North-Holland.

  • Parsons, T.: 1984, Assertion, denial and the liar paradox, Journal of Philosophical Logic 13, 137–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read, S.: (1994). Thinking about logic: An introduction to the philosophy of logic. Oxford University Press.

  • Scott, D.: (1975). Combinators and classes. in λ-calculus and computer science theory (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, volume 37), Springer-Verlag, 1–26.

  • Woodruff, P.: 1984, On supervaluations in free logic, Journal of Symbolic Logic 49, 943–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip Kremer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kremer, P., Urquhart, A. SUPERVALUATION FIXED-POINT LOGICS OF TRUTH. J Philos Logic 37, 407–440 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-007-9071-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-007-9071-1

Key words

Navigation