Skip to main content
Log in

A Two-Level Perspective on Preference

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a two-level modeling perspective which combines intrinsic ‘betterness’ and reason-based extrinsic preference, and develops its static and dynamic logic in tandem. Our technical results extend, integrate, and re-interpret earlier theorems on preference representation and update in the literature on preference change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andréka, H., Ryan, M., & Schobbens, P-Y. (2002). Operators and laws for combining preferential relations. Journal of Logic and Computation, 12, 12–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baltag, A., & Smets, S. (2006). Dynamic belief revision over multi-agent plausibility models. In Proceedings of LOFT’06, Liverpool.

  3. Boutilier, C. (1994). Conditional logics of normality: A modal approach. Artificial Intelligence, 68, 87–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. de Jongh, D., & Liu, F. (2009). Preference, priorities and belief. In T. Grüne-Yanoff, & S. O. Hansson (Eds.), Preference change: Approaches from philosophy, economics and psychology (pp. 85–108). Springer.

  5. Girard, P. (2008). Modal logics for belief and preference change. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University.

  6. Grossi, D., & Velazquez-Quesada, F. (2009). Twelve angry men: A study on the fine-grain of announcements. In J. Horty, X. He, & E. Pacuit (Eds.), LORI proceedings (pp. 147–170). Springer.

  7. Grüne-Yanoff, T., & Hansson, S. O. (Eds.) (2009). Preference change: Approaches from philosophy, economics and psychology. Theory and decision library. Springer.

  8. Halpern, J. Y. (1997). Defining relative likelihood in partially-ordered preferential structure. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 7, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hansson, B. (1969). An analysis of some deontic logics. Nous, 3, 373–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hansson, S. O. (1995). Changes in preference. Theory and Decision, 38, 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hansson, S. O. (2001). Preference logic. In D. Gabbay, & F. Guenthner (Eds.), Handbook of philosophical logic (Vol. 4, chap. 4, pp. 319–393). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Houser, D., Kurzban, R. (2002). Revealed preference, belief, and game theory. Economics and Philosophy, 16, 99–115.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lang, J., van der Torre, L., Weydert, E. (2003). Hidden uncertainty in the logical representation of desires. In Proceedings of IJCAI’03 (pp. 685–690).

  14. Liu, F. (2008). Changing for the better: Preference dynamics and agent diversity. Ph.D. thesis, ILLC, University of Amsterdam.

  15. Liu, F. (2010). Reasoning about preference dynamics. Manuscript.

  16. van Benthem, J. (2007). Dynamic logic for belief revision. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logic, 17, 129–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O. (2009). Everything else being equal: A modal logic approach for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 38(1), 83–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. van Benthem, J., Grossi, D., & Liu, F. (2010). Deontics = betterness + priority. In DEON’2010 proceedings (pp. 50–65).

  19. van Benthem, J., & Liu, F. (2007). Dynamic logic of preference upgrade. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logic, 17, 157–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. von Wright, G. H. (1963). The logic of preference. Edinburgh University Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fenrong Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, F. A Two-Level Perspective on Preference. J Philos Logic 40, 421–439 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-010-9168-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-010-9168-9

Keywords

Navigation