Abstract
Integration of vehicular ad hoc network and fixed IP network is important to provide Internet connection and mobile data service for vehicles. However, the unique characteristics of vehicular networks, such as linear topology and constrained movements of vehicles, are not considered in the conventional mobility management schemes. Using conventional schemes, unnecessary management messages are generated and the connections to roadside-installed base stations are not fully utilized. As the results, bandwidth is wasted and data delivery ratio is not maximized. In this paper, we propose a novel mobility management scheme to integrate vehicular ad hoc network and fixed IP networks more efficiently. The proposed scheme manages mobility of vehicles based on street layout as well as the distance between vehicles and base stations. Utilizing the unique characteristics of vehicular networks, the proposed scheme has substantially less mobility management overhead and higher data delivery ratio. The proposed scheme is simulated by SUMO (a vehicular traffic simulator) and QualNet (a data network simulator). The simulation results show that the proposed scheme reduced the mobility management overhead up to 63% and improved the data delivery ratio up to 90%.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
More details can be found in [19].
The dropped packets are not necessarily packets of data traffic.
References
Research and Innovative Technology Administration (2009) ITS joint program office home. http://www.its.dot.gov
Biswas S, Tatchikou R, Dion F (2006) Vehicle-to-vehicle wireless communication protocols for enhancing highway traffic safety. IEEE Commun Mag 1:74–82
Wu H, Fujimoto R, Guensler R, Hunter M (2004) MDDV: a mobility-centric data dissemination algorithm for vehicular networks. In: VANET’04, Proceedings of the 1st ACM international workshop on vehicular ad hoc networks, Philadelphia, pp 47–56
Zhao J, Cao G (2006) VADD: vehicle-assisted data delivery in vehicular ad hoc networks. In: INFOCOM
Yang X, Liu L, Vaidya N, Zhao F (2004) A vehicle-to-vehicle communication protocol for cooperative collision warning. In: The first annual international conference on IMobile and ubiquitous systems: networking and services, MOBIQUITOUS 2004, pp 114–123
Wu H, Fujimoto R, Guensler R, Hunter M (2004) A-STAR: a mobile ad hoc routing strategy for metropolis vehicular communications. In: Third international IFIP-TC6 networking conference, pp 989–999
Little T, Agarwal A (2005) An information propagation scheme for vanets. In: IEEE Intelligent transportation systems, pp 155–160
Bechler M, Wolf L, Franz W (2003) Mobile internet access in fleetNet. In: KiVS 2003: 13. Fachtagung Kommunikation in Verteilten Systemen, Leipzig
FleetNet (2009) FleetNet project homepage. http://www.et2.tu-harburg.de/fleetnet/
Communication Networks (2008) OverDRiVE project homepage. http://www.comnets.rwth-aachen.de/~o_drive/
CarTALK 2000 (2009) CarTALK 2000 project homepage. http://www.cartalk2000.net/
Bilstrup K, Uhlemann E, Strom E, Bilstrup U (2008) Evaluation of the IEEE 802.11p mac method for vehicle-to-vehicle communication. In: VTC 2008-Fall: IEEE 68th vehicular technology conference, Calgary, BC, pp 1–5
Jiang D, Delgrossi L (2008) IEEE 802.11p: towards an international standard for wireless access in vehicular environments. In: VTC 2008-Spring: IEEE vehicular technology conference, Singapore, pp 2036–2040
Gukhool B, Cherkaoui S (2008) IEEE 802.11p modeling in ns-2. In: LCN 2008: 33rd IEEE conference on local computer networks, Montreal, Que, pp 622–626
Hayashi M, Fukuzawa S, Ichikawa H, Kawato T, Yamada J, Tsuboi T, Matsui S, Maruyama T (2007) Development of vehicular communication (WAVE) system for safety applications. In: ITST ’07: 7th international conference on ITS telecommunications, pp 1–5
Bohm A, Jonsson M (2008) Supporting real-time data traffic in safety-critical vehicle-to-infrastructure communication. In: LCN 2008: 33rd IEEE conference on local computer networks, pp 614–621
Ruiz P, Ros F, Gomez-Skarmeta A (2005) Internet connectivity for mobile ad hoc networks: solutions and challenges. IEEE Commun Mag 43(10):118–125
Broch J, Maltz DA, Johnson DB (1999) Supporting hierarchy and heterogeneous interfaces in multi-hop wireless ad hoc networks. In: Proceedings of the fourth international symposium on parallel architectures, algorithms, and networks, (I-SPAN ’99), pp 370–375
Jönsson U, Alriksson F, Larsson T, Johansson P, Maguire GQ (2000) MIPMANET-mobile IP for mobile ad hoc networks. In: Mobile and ad hoc networking and computing (MobiHOC), pp 75–85
Ammari H, El-Rewini H (2004) Performance evaluation of hybrid environments with mobile gateways. In: Proceedings of the ninth international symposium on computers and communications. ISCC 2004, vol 1, pp 152–157, 28 June–1 July 2004
Perkins C (2002) IP mobility support for IPv4. In: RFC 3344
Farradyne P (2005) Vehicle infrastructure integration (VII)—VII architecture and functional requirements. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) draft, version 1.0
Fujimoto R, Wu H, Guensler R, Hunter M (2006) Modeling and simulation tools for emerging telecommunication networks, chapter 14. Springer, New York: pp 289–308
SUMO (2009) SUMO—simulation of urban mobility. http://sumo.sourceforge.net/
U.S. Census Bureau (2008) U.S. Census Bureau’s mapping and cartographic resources. http://tiger.census.gov/
Scalable Network Technologies (2009) Scalable network technologies, QualNet. http://www.scalable-networks.com/products/developer.php
Perkins C, Belding-Royer E, Das S (2003) Ad hoc on-demand distance vector (AODV) routing. In: RFC 3561. http://ietf.org/rfc/rfc3561.txt
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Peng, Y., Chang, J.M. A Novel Mobility Management Scheme for Integration of Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks and Fixed IP Networks. Mobile Netw Appl 15, 112–125 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-009-0205-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-009-0205-2