Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dependable Traffic Control Strategies for Urban and Freeway Networks

  • Published:
Mobile Networks and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traffic congestion is a growing problem in many countries around the world. It has been recognized that instead of constructing more roads and freeways to counter this problem it is prudent to improve the utilization of existing road network through a judicious combination of advances in control engineering, communication and information technology. The traffic control architecture proposed in this paper is a combination of communicating Urban Traffic Control Architecture (UTCA) and Freeway Traffic Control Architecture (FTCA). The UTCA combines context-awareness, Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) principles, and Autonomic Computing System (ACS) principles to optimize traffic congestion and enforce safety in urban traffic network. The UTCA includes a network of adaptive intersection traffic controllers and their immediate supervisory systems, who are also networked. The central piece of each traffic controller is an arbiter, which is a mini CPS. It is aware of the traffic dynamics at the intersection managed by it, by virtue of continuous input from monitoring sensors. Due to this context-awareness ability and its communication ability to exchange traffic information with its neighbors, it can execute policy-based reactions in order to enable safe and efficient traffic throughput at its intersection. Each urban traffic supervisory system is designed with ACS principles in order to minimize downtime caused by environmental emergencies and maximize security of the subsystem under it. A supervisory subsystem will also collect global traffic flow information and contextual constraints from its neighbors. Based on this input it will modify policies and communicate them to its traffic controller for timely adaptation. The urban traffic flowing into freeway traffic will be mediated by Intelligent Ramp Meters (IRM). An IRM interacts with the urban traffic control system and its nearest Intelligent Roadside Unit (IRSU) to regulate the flow of traffic from urban to freeway network. The FTCA consists of a network of mutually interacting IRSUs which monitor traffic flow, communicate with IRMs for providing traffic guidance for freeway drivers. An IRSU will communicate with the vehicles in the zone managed by it in order to provide information on rerouting when road and weather conditions warrant it. It also facilitates exchange of information between vehicles, guide them in lane changes and maintaining safe distance in order to avoid collision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pretschner A, Broy M, Kruger IH, Stauner T (2007) Software engineering for automotive systems: a roadmap. FOSE 7: Future of Software Engineering 1:55–61

    Google Scholar 

  2. uINRIX Americans will waste 2.8 trillion dollars on traffic by 2030 if gridlock persists. [Online]. Available: http://www.inrix.com/press/americans-will-waste-2-8-trillion-on-traffic-by-2030-if-gridlock-persists/ http://www.inrix.com/press/americans-will-waste-2-8-trillion-on-traffic-by-2030-if-gridlock-persists/ http://www.inrix.com/press/americans-will-waste-2-8-trillion-on-traffic-by-2030-if-gridlock-persists/

  3. Barth M, Boriboonsomsin K (2008) Real-world carbon dioxide impacts of traffic congestion. Transp Res Rec: J Transp Res Board 2058:163–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Administration FH (2005) Traffic control systems handbook. US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Operations

  5. (2006) Traffic detector handbook: third edition. US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Operations

  6. Schilit B, Adams N, Want R (1994) Context-aware computing applications. In: First workshop on mobile computing systems and applications, 1994. WMCSA 1994. IEEE, pp 85–90

  7. Alagar V, Mohammad M, Wan K, Hnaide SA (2014) A framework for developing context-aware systems. ICST Journal Springer 1:14

    Google Scholar 

  8. Avizienis A, Laprie J-C, Randell B, Landwehr C (2004) Basic concepts and taxonomy of dependable and secure computing. IEEE Trans Dependable Secure Comput 1(1):11–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mohammad M, Alagar V (2011) A formal approach for the specification and verification of trustworthy component-based systems. J Syst Softw 84(1):77–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kephart J, Kephart J, Chess D, Boutilier C, Das R, Kephart JO, Walsh WE (2007) An architectural blueprint for autonomic computing. IEEE Internet Comput 18(21)

  11. Kephart J, Chess D (2003) The vision of autonomic computing. Computer 36(1):41–50

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. NSF (2008) Cyber-physical systems (CPS). http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2008/nsf08611/nsf08611.htm http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2008/nsf08611/nsf08611.htm

  13. Wing JM (2008) Cyber-physical systems, http://www.cra.org/CRN/issues/0901.pdf http://www.cra.org/CRN/issues/0901.pdf

  14. SCOOT SCOOT - the world’s leading adaptive traffic control system. http://www.scoot-utc.com/

  15. Papageorgiou M, Diakaki C, Dinopoulou V, Kotsialos A, Wang Y (2003) Review of road traffic control strategies. Proc IEEE 91(12):2043–2067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Papageorgiou M, Hadj-Salem H, Blosseville JM (1991) Alinea: a local feedback control law for on-ramp metering, U.S Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, Transportation Research Record 1320

  17. FLIR (2014) Pedestrian presence sensors. http://www.flir.com/cs/emea/en/view/?id=60028/ http://www.flir.com/cs/emea/en/view/?id=60028/

  18. Lee E, et al. (2008) Cyber physical systems: design challenges. In: 2008 11th IEEE International symposium on object oriented real-time distributed computing (ISORC). IEEE, pp 363– 369

  19. Jackson D (2009) A direct path to dependable software. Commun ACM 52:78–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Alagar V, Wan K (2014) An Approach to Designing an Autonomic Network of Traffic Managers. ICCVE 2014

  21. Ahn K, Rakha H, Trani A, Van Aerde M (2002) Estimating vehicle fuel consumption and emissions based on instantaneous speed and acceleration levels. J Transp Eng 128(2):182–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. NASA (2010) Architecture and artificial intelligence, howpublished = http://attic.gsfc.nasa.gov/ants/ArchandAI.html

  23. Bomze IM, Budinich M, Pardalos PM, Pelillo M (1999) The maximum clique problem. In: Handbook of combinatorial optimization. Springer, pp 1–74

  24. Bron C, Kerbosch J (1973) Algorithm 457: finding all cliques of an undirected graph. Commun ACM 16 (9):575–577

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Gipps PG (1981) A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation. Transp Res B Methodol 15 (2):105– 111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Treiber M, Hennecke A, Helbing D (2000) Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations. Phys Rev E 62(2):1805

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Alur R (2011) Formal verification of hybrid systems. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Embedded Software (EMSOFT), 2011, pp 273–278

  28. Archer J (2000) Fundamental traffic safety issues concerning the use of intelligent transportation systems, Working Paper, Royal Institute of Technology, Tech. Rep. WP-862

  29. McKnight DH, Chervany NL (2001) Trust and distrust definitions: One bite at a time. In: Trust in Cyber Societies. Springer, LNAI 2246, pp 27–54

  30. Johnson D, Grayson K (2005) Cognitive and affective trust in service relationship. J Bus Res 58:500–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee J, See K (2004) Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance. Hum Factors 46:50–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hoffmann H, Söllner M (2014) Incorporating behavioral trust theory into system development for ubiquitous applications. Pers Ubiquit Comput 18:117–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Alriyami Q, Adnane A, Smith AK (2014) Evaluation criterias for trust management in vehicular ad-hoc networks (vanets). In: ICCVE Conference, Vienna, pp 1–9

  34. Monir MB, Aziz MHAE, Hamid AAA (2013) A trust-based message reporting scheme for vanet. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering 5:376–394

    Google Scholar 

  35. Administration FH (2005) Traffic control systems handbook. WHO Regional Office of Europe

  36. NSF (2008) Fundamental traffic safety issues concerning the use of intelligent transportation systems, Technical Report, NSF Program Solicitation, Tech. Rep. NSF-08-611

  37. Avizienis A, Laprie JC, Randell B, Landwehr C (2004) Basic concepts and taxonomy of dependable and secure computing. TIEEE Trans Dependable Secure Comput 1:11–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Mohammad M, Alagar V (2011) A formal approach for the specification and verification of trustworthy component-based systems. J Syst Softw 4:77–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Abumansoor O, Boukerche A (2011) Towards a secure model for vehicular ad-hoc network services. In: IEEE Globecom Proceedings, Orlando, Florida, pp 1–5

  40. Gipps PG (1986) A model for the structure of lane-changing decisions. Transp Res B Methodol 20(5):403–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Mirchandani P, Wang F-Y (2005) Rhodes to intelligent transportation systems. IEEE Intell Syst 20(1):10–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Toledo T, Koutsopoulos HN, Ben-Akiva ME (2003) Modeling integrated lane-changing behavior. Transp Res Rec: J Transp Res Board 1857(1):30–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Kesting A, Treiber M, Helbing D (2015) General lane-changing model mobil for car-following models. Transp Res Rec: J Transp Res Board

  44. Hwang J-H, Arkin RC, Kwon D-S (2003) Mobile robots at your fingertip: Bezier curve on-line trajectory generation for supervisory control. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2003. (IROS 2003). Proceedings. 2003, vol 2. IEEE, pp 1444–1449

  45. Tarjan R (1972) Depth-first search and linear graph algorithms. SIAM J Comput 1(2):146–160

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Robertson DI (1969) Transyt: a traffic network study tool

  47. Nguyen DN (2015) Adaptive traffic control system; design and simulation. Concordia University, Montreal, Canada, Master of Computer Science Thesis

  48. Hidas P (2002) Modelling lane changing and merging in microscopic traffic simulation. Transp Res C: Emerg Technol 10(5):351–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Robin T, Antonini G, Bierlaire M, Cruz J (2007) Specification, estimation, validation of a pedestrian walking behavior model, TRANSP-OR, Ecole Polytechnique Fédéale de Lausanne and IBM Research GmbH, Zurich Research Lab, Research Report

  50. Alur R (2013) Can we verify cyber-physical systems?: technical perspective. Commun ACM 56(10):96–96. doi:10.1145/2507771.2507782

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  51. Alur R, Henzinger TA, Vardi MY (2015) Theory in practice for system design and verification. ACM SIGLOG News 2(1):46–51. doi:10.1145/2728816.2728827

    Google Scholar 

  52. Google Google self-driving car project. http://www.google.com/selfdrivingcar http://www.google.com/selfdrivingcar

  53. BCC News Rival robot cars meet on california highway. http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-33286811

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Research Grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project Number 61103029),Research Development Funding of Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (Project Number RDF-13-02-06), and Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council, Canada.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China

    Kaiyu Wan

  2. Concordia University, Montreal, Canada

    Nhat Nguyen & Vangalur Alagar

Authors
  1. Kaiyu Wan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nhat Nguyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vangalur Alagar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vangalur Alagar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wan, K., Nguyen, N. & Alagar, V. Dependable Traffic Control Strategies for Urban and Freeway Networks. Mobile Netw Appl 21, 98–126 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-016-0681-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-016-0681-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation