Skip to main content
Log in

Receiver-centric physical carrier sensing for vehicular Ad Hoc networks

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The sender-centric medium access has been widely deployed to avoid interference in vehicular ad hoc networks, even though sender-centric physical carrier sensing suffers from exposed terminal problems and sender-centric virtual carrier sensing is relatively vulnerable to interference. In this paper, we propose a new receiver-centric MAC protocol, called RIMAC, to increase spatial reuse and network capacity. In RIMAC, the receivers accurately assess their channel status opposed to the sender initiated approach where senders can only heuristically infer that of their receivers. Therefore, the receiver-centric approach achieves a better level of spatial reuse with the same degree of interference prevention. Through both extensive numerical analysis and simulation studies, we find that the proposed receiver-centric MAC achieves up to 68 % higher network capacity than traditional sender-initiated approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Although ACK frames are generally small in size, it may contribute up to 21 % of the total transmission duration in 802.11a with 54Mbps data rate and 1kbyte payload due to the inter-frame spaces and the physical layer headers.

References

  1. Bharghavan V, Demers A, Shenker S, Zhang L (1994) MACAW: a media access protocol for wireless LANs. In ACM SIGCOMM'94, London, UK

  2. Daeinabi A, Rahbar AG (2013) Detection of malicious vehicles (DMV) through monitoring in Vehicular Ad-Hoc Networks. Springer Multimedia Tools and Appl 66(2):325–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hekmat R, Mieghem P (2002) Interference in Wireless Multi-hop Ad-hoc Networks and its Effect on Network Capacity. In Med-hoc-Net, Sardegna, Italy

  4. IEEE Std (1999) 802.11a, 802.11a–1999

  5. IEEE Std (2012) 802.11–2012 - IEEE Standard for Information technology–Telecommunications and information exchange between systems Local and metropolitan area networks–Specific requirements Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications

  6. Jamieson K, Hull B, Miu A, Balakrishnan H (2005) Understanding Real-World Performance of Carrier Sense. In ACM E-WIND Workshop’05, Philadelphia, PA

  7. Kim D, Kim J (2012) A collision avoidance scheme for the synchronized broadcast packets in a multi-AP Wi-Fi broadcasting system. Springer Multimedia Tools and Appl. doi:10.1007/s11042-012-1113-1

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mittag J, Hartenstein H (2013) Characterization of Carrier Sense Multiple Access in Vehicular Propagation Channels. In High Performance Computing in Science and Engineering’12: 561–569

  9. Palazzi C, Ferretti S, Roccetti M (2009) Communities on the road: fast triggering of interactive multimedia services. Springer Multimedia Tools and Appl 44(2):229–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rappaport T (2002) Wireless Communications Principle and Practice Second Edition. Prentice Hall

  11. Stanica R, Chaput E, Beylot A.-L (2011) Physical Carrier Sense in Vehicular Ad-Hoc Networks. In IEEE Mobile Adhoc and Sensor Systems (MASS), Valencia, Spain

  12. Stanica R, Chaput E, Beylot A.-L (2012) Congestion control in CSMA-based vehicular networks: Do not forget the carrier sensing. In IEEE Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON), Seoul, Korea

  13. The MathWorks Inc. (2000) MATLAB User's Guide, Version 6

  14. Tobagi F, Kleinrock L (1975) Packet Switching in radio channels: part ii – the hidden terminal problem in carrier sense multiple-access modes and the busy-tone solution. IEEE Trans on Commun COM-23(12):1417–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu H-T, Hsieh W-S (2013) RSU-based message authentication for vehicular ad-hoc networks. Springer Multimedia Tools and Appl 66(2):215–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Xu K, Gerla M, Bae S (2002) How Effective is the IEEE 802.11 RTS/CTS Handshake in Ad Hoc Networks? In IEEE Globecom’02, Taipei, Taiwan

  17. Yang X, Vaidya N (2005) On the Physical Carrier Sense In Wireless Ad Hoc Networks. In IEEE Infocom’05, Miami

  18. Zhai H, Fang Y (2006) Physical Carrier Sensing and Spatial Reuse in Multirate and Multihop Wireless Ad Hoc Networks. In IEEE Infocom’06, Barcelona, Spain

  19. Zhu J, Guo X, Yang L, Conner W (2004) Leveraging Spatial Reuse in 802.11 Mesh Networks with Enhanced Physical Carrier Sensing. In IEEE ICC’04, Paris, France

  20. Zorzi M, Rao R (2003) Geographic Random Forwarding (GeRaF) for ad hoc and sensor networks: energy and latency performance. IEEE Trans on Mob Comput 2(4):349–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Gachon University research fund of 2013 (GCU-2013-R285).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joon Yoo.

Additional information

A preliminary version of this paper appeared in the International Workshop on Convergence Information System and Applications (IWCISA), Pattaya, Thailand, June 2013. This version adds detailed description, extended mathematical analysis, and simulation results on the performance of the proposal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yoo, J. Receiver-centric physical carrier sensing for vehicular Ad Hoc networks. Multimed Tools Appl 74, 2405–2415 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-014-1851-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-014-1851-3

Keywords

Navigation