Skip to main content
Log in

Camouflage performance analysis and evaluation framework based on features fusion

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The analysis and evaluation of camouflage performance is an important procedure in digital camouflage pattern design, as it helps to improve the design quality of camouflage patterns. In this paper, we propose a novel framework that uses the nonlinear fusion of multiple image features to quantitatively evaluate the degree to which the target and surrounding background differ with respect to background-related and internal features. In our framework, background-related features are first formulated as a measure of conspicuousness, which is calculated and quantized by the saliency detection method, whereas internal features refer to the interior saliency of camouflage textures, such as lines and other regular patterns. These two features are fused to evaluate the camouflage effect. A subjective evaluation is carried out as the baseline of our evaluation model. Experimental results show that our camouflage evaluation framework accords with the human visual perception mechanism, and is an effective method for evaluating camouflage pattern design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bhajantri NU, Nagabhusan P (2006) Camouflage defect identification: a novel approach. Ninth Int Conf Inf Technol. (ICIT’06) 0-7695-2635-7/06

  2. Bian P, Jin Y, Zhangi NR (2010) Fuzzy C-means clustering based digital camouflage pattern design and its evaluation. In: IEEE 10th International Conference on Signal Processing I-III:1017-1020

  3. Cheng MM, Zhang GX, Mitra NJ, Huang X, Hu SM (2011) Global contrast based salient region detection,” in Proc. IEEE Comp Soc Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit (CVPR), pp 409–416

  4. Cui B-S, Li H-B, Fu S-W (1993) Fuzzy analysis of the target detection probability. Eng Equip Res 3(1):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  5. Feng X, Guoying C, Richang H (2014) Camouflage texture evaluation using a saliency map. Multimed Syst 21:169–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hough VPC (1960) Method and means for recognizing complex patterns. US Patent US3069654 A

  7. Liming S, Weidong G (2010) A New Camouflage Texture Evaluation Method Based on WSSIM and Nature Image Features. Int Conf Multimed Technol 2010, pp 1–4

  8. Lin W, Chen Y-H, Gao H-S (2009) Detection probability evaluation model based on texture feature of thermal infrared. Infrared Laser Eng 38(1):155–159

    Google Scholar 

  9. Liu T, Yuan Z, Sun J, Wang J, Zheng N (2011) Learning to detect a salient object. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 33(2):353–365

  10. Nyberg S, Bohman L (2001) Assessing camouflage using textural features. Proc SPIE 4370:60–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nyberg S, Uppsaell MS, Bohman L (2001) Approach to assessment of camouflage methodology. Proc.SPIE 1967. doi:10.1117/12.151052

  12. Perazzi F, Krähenbül P, Pritch Y, Hornung A (2012) Saliency filters: contrast based filtering for salient region detection. IEEE CVPR 733–740

  13. Rosten E, Mmond T (2006) Machine learning for high-speed corner detection[J]. European Conference on Computer Vision 1:430–443

  14. Schoene R, Meidow J, Mauer E (2010) Feature evaluation for target/background discrimination in image sequence taken by approaching sensors. Proc. SPIE Int. Conf. Signal Process. Sens. Fusion Target Recognit. XIX. Orlando: SPIE,7697: 769718

  15. Singh SK, Dhawale CA, Misra S (2013) Survey of object detection methods in camouflaged image. IERI Procedia 4:351–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wei L, Yu-hua C, Hong-sheng G (2007) A method of camouflage evaluation based on texture analysis model of Gabor wavelet. Acta Armamentarii 28(10):1191–1194

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wei-dong X, Liang-xu L, Cheng B, Shi-qiang X (2002) Camouflage equipment effectiveness evaluation model based on texture analysis. Acta Armamentarii 23(3):329–331

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yanhua H, Wenyuan W, Yanchun G (2011) A new method of edge camouflage evaluation based on the gray polymerization histogram. Opt Technol 37(5):601–606

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ying XU, Yao SL (2010) Optic Camouflage Effect Evaluation Method Based on Image Analyses[J]. Electro-Optic Technology Application 4:69-72

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61202283 and 61472115), and the Open Project Program of the National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition (NLPR, No. 201407350).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Feng Xue.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xue, F., Yong, C., Xu, S. et al. Camouflage performance analysis and evaluation framework based on features fusion. Multimed Tools Appl 75, 4065–4082 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-015-2946-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-015-2946-1

Keywords

Navigation