Abstract
3D face shape is essentially a non-rigid free-form surface, which will produce non-rigid deformation under expression variations. In terms of that problem, a promising solution named Coherent Point Drift (CPD) non-rigid registration for the non-rigid region is applied to eliminate the influence from the facial expression while guarantees 3D surface topology. In order to take full advantage of the extracted discriminative feature of the whole face under facial expression variations, the novel expression-robust 3D face recognition method using feature-level fusion and feature-region fusion is proposed. Furthermore, the Principal Component Analysis and Linear Discriminant Analysis in combination with Rotated Sparse Regression (PL-RSR) dimensionality reduction method is presented to promote the computational efficiency and provide a solution to the curse of dimensionality problem, which benefit the performance optimization. The experimental evaluation indicates that the proposed strategy has achieved the rank-1 recognition rate of 97.91 % and 96.71 % based on Face Recognition Grand Challenge (FRGC) v2.0 and Bosphorus respectively, which means the proposed approach outperforms state-of-the-art approach.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alyuz N, Gokberk B, Akarun L (2010) Regional registration for expression resistant 3-D face recognition. IEEE Trans Inform Forensics Sec 5(3):425–440
Belhumeur PN, Hespanha JP, Kriegman DJ (1997) Eigenfaces vs. Fisherfaces: recognition using class specific linear projection. IEEE Trans Patt Anal Mach Intell 19(7):711–720
Besl PJ, McKay ND (1992) A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Trans Patt Anal Mach Intell 14(2):239–256
Bronstein AM, Bronstein MM, Kimmel R (2007) Expression-invariant representations of faces. IEEE Trans Image Process 16(1):188–197
Cai L, Da FP (2012) Nonrigid-deformation recovery for 3D face recognition using multiscale registration. Comput Graph Applic 32(3):37–45
Cai L, Da FP (2012) Estimating inter-personal deformation with multi-scale modelling between expression for three-dimensional face recognition. IET Comput Vis 6:468–479
Chang KI, Bowyer KW, Flynn PJ (2006) Multiple nose region matching for 3D face recognition under varying facial expression. IEEE Trans Patt Anal Mach Intell 28(10):1695–1700
Chen D, Cao XD, Fen F, and Sun J (2013) Blessing of dimensionality: high-dimensional feature and its efficient compression for face verification, in: Proc Conf Comput Vis Patt Recognit. 3025–3032
Daoudi M, Srivastava A, Veltkamp R (2013) 3D face modeling, analysis and recognition. Wiley, Chichester
Drira H, Ben Amor B, Srivastava A, Daoudi M, Slama R (2013) 3D face recognition under expressions, occlusions, and pose variations. IEEE Trans Patt Anal Mach Intell 35(9):2270–2283
Faltemier TC, Bowyer KW, Flynn PJ (2008) A region ensemble for 3-D face recognition. IEEE Trans Inform Forensics Sec 3(1):62–72
Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R (2010) Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. J Stat Softw 33:1–22
Gökberk B, Salah AA, Alyüz N, Akarun L (2009) 3D face recognition: technology and applications, Handbook of Remote Biometrics. 217–246
Gu XF, Gortler SJ, Hoppe H (2002) Geometry images. ACM Trans Graph (TOG) 21(3):355–361
Gupta P, Zaroliagis C, Maiti S, Sangwan D, Raheja JL (2014) Expression-invariant 3D face recognition using K-SVD method, applied algorithms. 266–276
Hiremath PS, Hiremath M (2014) 3D face recognition based on radon transform, PCA, LDA using KNN and SVM. Int J Comput Network Inform Sec 7:36–43
Huttenlocher DP, Klanderman GA, Rucklidge WJ (1993) Comparing images using the Hausdorff distance. IEEE Trans Patt Anal Mach Intell 15(9):850–863
Jolliffe IT (1986) Principal component analysis, 1st edn. Springer, New York
Kakadiaris IA, Passalis G, Toderici G, Murtuza MN, Lu Y, Karampatziakis N, Theoharis T (2007) Three-dimensional face recognition in the presence of facial expressions: An annotated deformable model approach. IEEE Trans Patt Anal Mach Intell 29(4):640–649
Lee YH, Shim JC (2004) Curvature based human face recognition using depth weighted hausdorff distance, in: Proceed Int Conf Imag Process. 1429–1432
Lei YJ, Bennamoun M, Hayat M, Guo YL (2014) An efficient 3D face recognition approach using local geometrical signatures. Pattern Recogn 47(2):509–524
Lei YJ, Bennamoun M, El-Sallam AA (2013) An efficient 3D face recognition approach based on the fusion of novel local low-level features. Pattern Recogn 46(1):24–37
Li XL, Da FP (2012) Efficient 3D face recognition handling facial expression and hair occlusion. Image Vis Comput 30(9):668–679
Li HB et al (2014) Expression-robust 3D face recognition via weighted sparse representation of multi-scale and multi-component local normal patterns. Neurocomputing 133:179–193
Lin WY, Chen MY (2014) A novel framework for automatic 3D face recognition using quality assessment. Multimed Tools Applic 68:877–893
Liu YH (2004) Improving ICP with easy implementation for free-form surface matching. Pattern Recogn 37(2):211–226
Lu XG, Jain AK, Colbry D (2006) Matching 2.5D face scans to 3D models. IEEE Trans Patt Anal Mach Intell 28(1):31–43
Mallat SG (1989) A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation. IEEE Trans Patt Anal Mach Intell 11(7):674–693
Mian AS, Bennamoun M, Owens R (2007) An efficient multimodal 2D-3D hybrid approach to automatic face recognition. IEEE Trans Patt Anal Mach Intell 29(11):1927–1943
Mian AS, Bennamoun M, Owens R (2008) Keypoint detection and local feature matching for textured 3D Face recognition. Int J Comput Vis 79:1–12
Mohammadzade H, Hatzinakos D (2013) Iterative closest normal point for 3D face recognition. IEEE Trans Patt Anal Mach Intell 35(2):381–397
Myronenko A, Song X (2010) Point set registration: coherent point drift. IEEE Trans PattAnal Mach Intell 32(12):2262–2275
Phillips PJ, Flynn PJ, Scruggs T, Bowyer KW (2006) Overview of the face recognition grand challenge, in: Proc Conf Comput Vis Patt Recognit. 947–954
Queirolo CC et al (2010) 3D face recognition using simulated annealing and the surface interpenetration measure. IEEE Trans Patt Anal Mach Intell 32(2):206–219
Ritter J (2002) Wavelet based image compression using FPGAs. Martin-Luther-University Halle, Wittenberg
Russ TD, Koch MW, Little CQ (2005) A 2D range Hausdorff approach for 3D face recognition, in: Proc IEEE Comput Soc Conf Comput Vis Patt Recognit-Workshops. 169–176
Savran A. et al (2008) Bosphorus database for 3D face analysis, biometrics and identity management. 47–56
Smeets D, Keustermans J, Vandermeulen D, Suetens P (2013) meshSIFT: Local surface features for 3D face recognition under expression variations and partial data. Comput Vis Image Underst 117(2):158–169
Turk MA, Pentland AP (1991) Face recognition using eigenfaces, in: Proc Conf Comput Vis Patt Recognit. 586–591
Wang XQ, Ruan QQ, Ming Y (2010) 3D face recognition using corresponding point direction measure and depth local features, in: Proc 10th Int Conf Signal Process. 86–89
Yi J, Wang YZ, Ruan QQ, Wang XQ (2011) A new scheme for 3D face recognition based on 2D Gabor Wavelet Transform plus LBP, in: Proc 6th Int Conf Comput Sci Educ. 860–865
Yue M (2013) Rigid-area orthogonal spectral regression for efficient 3D face recognition. Neurocomputing 129:445–457
Zhang LY, Razdan A, Farin G, Femiani J, Bae M, Lockwood C (2006) 3D face authentication and recognition based on bilateral symmetry analysis. Vis Comput 22(1):43–55
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the editorial office and five anonymous reviewers who gave valuable comments and helpful suggestions which greatly improved the quality of the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51175081, No. 51475092, No. 61405034), Doctoral Fund of Ministry of Education of China (No. 20130092110027).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Deng, X., Da, F. & Shao, H. Expression-robust 3D face recognition based on feature-level fusion and feature-region fusion. Multimed Tools Appl 76, 13–31 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-015-3012-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-015-3012-8