Skip to main content
Log in

The application of nonlocal total variation in image denoising for mobile transmission

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Image transmission is one of the key techniques in image mobile communication. However, it is generally corrupted by noise in wireless channel, which will decrease the visual quality and affect the sub-sequential applications, such as pattern recognition, classification and so on. Total variation is widely used in the problems of image denoising, due to its advantage in preserving texture in image. In this paper, a novel minimization framework is presented where the objective function includes an usual l 2 data-fidelity term and two types of total variation regularizer. According to the theory analysis, the novel objective function can preserve the local geometric structure in restored image. Furthermore, we proposes to solve the novel framework with majorization- minimization and compares this novel algorithm with some current restoration method. The numerical experiments show the efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beck A, Teboulle M (2009) Fast gradient-based algorithms for constrained total variation image denoising and deblurring problems[J]. IEEE Trans Image Process 18(11):2419–2434

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bioucas-Dias J, Figueiredo M, Oliveira J (2006) Total-variation image deconvolution: a majorization-minimization approach[C]. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Toulouse, France

  3. Bruckstein AM, Donoho DL, Elad M (2009) From sparse solutions of systems of equations to sparse modeling of signals and images[J]. SIAM Rev 51(1):34–81

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Buades A, Coll B, Morel JM (2005) A non-local algorithm for image denoising[C]. IEEE Int Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recogn 2:60–65

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Chambolle A (2004) An algorithm for total variation minimization and applications[J]. J Math Imaging Vis 20:89–97

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Chan TF, Esedoglu S, Park F, Yip A (2004) Recent developments in total variation image restoration, CAM Report 05–01, Department of Mathematics, UCLA

  7. Chan T, Marquina A, Mulet P (2000) High-order total variationbased image restoration[J]. SIAM J Sci Comput 22:503–516

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. da Cunha AL, Zhou J, Do MN (2006) The nonsubsampled contourlet transform: theory, design, and applications[J]. IEEE Trans Image Process 15(10):3089–3101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dai S, Han M, Xu W, Wu Y, Gong Y, Katsaggelos AK (2009) Softcuts: a soft edge smoothness prior for color image super-resolution[J]. IEEE Trans Image Process 18(5):969–981

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Dobson DC, Santosa F (1996) Recovery of blocky images from noisy and blurred data. SIAM J Appl Math 56:1181–1198

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Dobson DC, Santosa F (1996) Recovery of blocky images from noisy and blurred data. SIAM J Appl Math 56(4):1181–1198

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Figueiredo MAT, Dias JB, Oliveira JP, Nowak RD (2006) On total variation denoising: a new majorization-minimization algorithm and an experimental comparison with wavalet denoising.[C] IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), Atlanta, GA 2633–2636

  13. Foi A, Katkovnik V, Egiazarian K (2007) Pointwise shape-adaptive DCT for high-quality denoising and deblocking of grayscale and color images[J]. IEEE Trans Image Process 16(5):1395–1411

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Guo X, Li F, Ng MK (2009) A fast ℓ1-TV algorithm for image restoration. SIAM J Sci Comput 31:2322–2341

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Hunter DR, Lange K (2004) A tutorial on MM algorithms[J]. Am Stat 58:30–37

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Lefkimmiatis S, Bourquard A, Unser M (2012) Hessian-based norm regularization for image restoration with biomedical applications[J]. IEEE Trans Image Process 21:983–995

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Li A, Li Y, Yang XD, Liu Y (2013) Image restoration with dual-prior constraint models based on split bregman. J Opt Rev 20(6):491–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Osher S, Marquina A (2000) Explicit algorithms for a new time dependent model based on level set motion for nonlinear deblurring and noise removal[J]. SIAM J Sci Comput 22:387–405

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Phillips DL (1962) A technique for the numerical solution of certain integral equations of the first kind. J Assoc Comput Mach 9:84–97

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Rudin L, Osher S (1994) Total variation based image restoration with free local constraints. Proc 1st IEEE ICIP 1:31–35

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rudin L, Osher S, Fatemi E (1992) Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms[J]. Phys D 60:259–268

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Strong DM, Blomgren P, Chan TF (1997) Spatially adaptive local feature driven total variation minimizing image restoration.[C] F. Preteux, J. L. Davidson, E. R. Dougherty (Eds.) Conference on Statistical and Stochastic Methods in Image Processing II, San Diego, Ca 222–233

  23. Tikhonov AN (1963) Solution of incorrectly formulated problems and the regularization method. Sov Math Dokl 4:1035–1038

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Vese L (2001) A study in the bv space of a denoising-deblurring variational problem. Appl Math Optim 44(2):131–161

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang J, Yin W, Zhang Y et al (2009) A fast algorithm for edge-preserving variational multichannel image restoration[J]. SIAM J Imaging Sci 2:569–592

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang X, Burger M, Bresson X, Osher S (2010) Bregmanized nonlocal regularization for de-convolution and sparse reconstruction[J]. SIAM J Imaging Sci 3:253–276

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Key Development Program of Basic Research of China(JCKY2013604B001), the Nation Nature Science Foundation of China (61301095), Nature Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province of China (F201408) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. HEUCF100814 and HEUCF100816).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yun Lin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Meantime, all the authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, Q., Li, Y. & Lin, Y. The application of nonlocal total variation in image denoising for mobile transmission. Multimed Tools Appl 76, 17179–17191 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-016-3760-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-016-3760-0

Keywords

Navigation