Skip to main content
Log in

Semi-supervised classification framework of hyperspectral images based on the fusion evidence entropy

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increasing attention is being paid to the classification of ground objects using hyperspectral spectrometer images. A key challenge of most hyperspectral classifications is the cost of training samples. It is difficult to acquire enough effective marked label sets using classification model frameworks. In this paper, a semi-supervised classification framework of hyperspectral images is proposed to better solve problems associated with hyperspectral image classification. The proposed method is based on an iteration process, making full use of the small amount of labeled data in a sample set. In addition, a new unlabeled data trainer in the self-training semi-supervised learning framework is explored and implemented by estimating the fusion evidence entropy of unlabeled samples using the minimum trust evaluation and maximum uncertainty. Finally, we employ different machine learning classification methods to compare the classification performance of different hyperspectral images. The experimental results indicate that the proposed approach outperforms traditional state-of-the-art methods in terms of low classification errors and better classification charts using few labeled samples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alajlan N, Bazi Y, Melgani F, Yager RR (2012) Fusion of supervised and unsupervised learning for improved classification of hyperspectral images. Inf Sci 217:39–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Anil KJ (2010) Data clustering: 50 years beyond K-means. Pattern Recogn Lett 31(8):651–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chang CC, Lin CJ (2011) LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. ACM transactions on intelligent systems and. Technology 2(3):1–27

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cortes C, Vapnik V (1995) Support-vector networks. Machine Leaning 20(3):273–297

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Cover T, Hart P (1967) Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 13(1):21–27

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Dalponte M, Ørka HO et al (2014) Tree crown delineation and tree species classification in boreal forests using hyperspectraland ALS data. Remote Sens Environ 140:306–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Du P, Zhang W, Xia J (2011) Hyperspectral remote sensing image classification based on decision level fusion. Chin Opt Lett 9(2):031002:1-8

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fitzpatrick-Lins K (1980) The accuracy of selected land use and land cover maps at scales of 1:250,000 and 1:100,000. J Res US Geol Surv 6:169–173

    Google Scholar 

  9. Goetz AFH (2009) Three decades of hyperspectral remote sensing of the Earth: a personal view. Remote Sens Environ 113:S5–S16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hosseinzadeh H, Razzazi F, Haghbin A (2015) A self training approach to automatic modulation classification based on semi-supervised online passive aggressive algorithm. Wirel Pers Commun 82(3):1303–1319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ifarraguerri A, Chang C (2000) Unsupervised hyperspectral image analysis with projection pursuit. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 38:2529–2538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li B, Pang FW (2013) An approach of vessel collision risk assessment based on the D-S evidence theory. Ocean Eng 74:16–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Li J, Bioucas-Dias JM, Plaza A (2013) Semi-supervised hyperspectral image classification using soft sparse multinomial logistic regression. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 10:318–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li Y, Lu H, Li J et al (2017) Underwater image de-scattering and classification by deep neural network. Comput Electr Eng 54(2017):68–77

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lin HT, Lin CJ, Weng RC (2007) A note on Platt’s probabilistic outputs for support vector machines. Mach Learn 68(3):267–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lu H, Zhang L, Serikawa S (2012) Maximum local energy: an effective approach for multisensor image fusion in beyond wavelet transform domain. Computers and Mathematics with Applications 64(5):996–1003

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Lu H, Zhang L, Serikawa S (2012) A multi-sensor fusion method for pan-sharpening in sharp frequency localized Contourlet transform domain. Disaster Advances 5(4):580–589

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lu H, Li B, Zhu J et al (2016) Wound intensity correction and segmentation with convolutional neural networks. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience. doi:10.1002/cpe.3927

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ma Z, Redmond RL (1995) Tau coefficients for accuracy assessment of classification of remote sensing data. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 61:435–439

    Google Scholar 

  20. Platt JC (2000) Probabilistic outputs for support vector machines and comparison to regularized likelihood methods. MA, USA, Cambridge, pp 61–74

    Google Scholar 

  21. Redner RA, Walker HF (1982) Mixture densities, maximum likelihood and the EM algorithm. SIAM Rev 26(2):195–239

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Rrnyi A (1961) On Measures of Entropy and Information. Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability, vol 1:547–561

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Santos A, Canuto A (2014) Applying semi-supervised learning in hierarchical multi-label classification. Expert Syst Appl 41(14):6075–6085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sarkar S, Das S, Chaudhuri SS (2015) Hyper-spectral image segmentation using Rényi entropy based multi-level thresholding aided with differential evolution. Expert Syst Appl 50:120–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shao Z, Zhang L, Zhou X, Ding L (2014) A novel hierarchical semi-supervised SVM for classification of hyperspectral images. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 11(9):1609–1613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Si L, Wang Z, Tan C et al (2014) A novel approach for coal seam terrain prediction through information fusion of improved D-S evidence theory and neural network. Measurement 54:140–151

  27. Tan K, Li E, Du Q et al (2014) An efficient semi-supervised classification approach for hyperspectral imagery. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sensing 97:36–45

  28. Tong Q, Xue Y, Zhang L (2014) Progress in hyperspectral remote sensing science and technology in China over the past three decades. IEEE Journal of Selected Topicsin Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing 7(1):70–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang Y, Guo L, Liang N (2012) Classification algorithm of hyperspectral images basedon kernel entropy analysis. Jilin Daxue Xuebao (Gongxueban)/Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition) 42(6):1597–1601 (in Chinese)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang C, Xu M, Wang X, Zheng S, Ma Z (2013) Object-oriented change detection approach for high-resolution remote sensing images based on multiscale fusion. J Appl Remote Sens 7(1):073696:1–15

  31. Wang S, Yang X et al (2015) Identification of green, oolong and black teas in China via wavelet packet entropy and fuzzy support vector machine. Entropy 17(10):6663–6682

  32. Wang J, Jiang N, Zhang G et al (2015) Semi-supervised classification algorithm for hyperspectral remote sensing image based on DE-self-training. Nongye Jixie Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery 46(5):239–244 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wang S, Lu S et al (2016) Dual-tree complex wavelet transform and twin support vector machine for pathological brain detection. Appl Sci 6(6):169

  34. Yang GP, Yu XC, Zhou X, Zhang PQ (2010) Research on relevance vector machine for hyperspectral imagery classification. Acta Geodaeticaet Cartographica Sinica 39(6):572–578 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang Y, Chen S et al (2015) Magnetic resonance brain image classification based on weighted-type fractional Fourier transform and nonparallel support vector machine. Int J Imaging Syst Technol 24(4):317–327

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang Z, Pasolli E, Crawford MM et al (2016) An active learning framework for hyperspectral image classification using hierarchical segmentation. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing 9(2):640–654

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was jointly supported by the Chinese Ministry of Land and Resources Nonprofit Sector Research and Special Project Fund (2014110220202), The Open Program of Collaborative Innovation Center of Geo-Information Technology for Smart Central Plains Henan Province (2016A002), Henan Polytechnic University Doctoral Fund (B2016-13), Open Fund of the Key Laboratory of Mine Spatial Information Technologies of the National Administration of Surveying, Mapping, and Geoinformation (KLM201407) and NSFC of China under Grant (41401403).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chunyang Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, C., Xu, Z., Wang, S. et al. Semi-supervised classification framework of hyperspectral images based on the fusion evidence entropy. Multimed Tools Appl 77, 10615–10633 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-017-4686-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-017-4686-x

Keywords

Navigation