Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Design and evaluation of a digital wearable ring and a smartphone application to help monitor and manage the effects of Raynaud’s phenomenon

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents the iterative research, design and evaluation phases of a digital wearable health system for monitoring, managing and possibly assisting in preventing the effects of a chronic disease called Raynaud’s Phenomenon (RP). The wearable health system is composed of three main parts, a physical product of a smart ring, the digital infrastructure of the physical computing subsystem (hardware and software) and an accompanying smartphone application. A set of design requirements that best describe the functionality and the characteristics of wearable health systems have been selected to derive a thorough study and evaluate the design prototype. We present these along with a set of guidelines for designing wearable health systems (device products and software at the application level) with focus on usability and user experience. The purpose is to evaluate, the prototype which is based on multiple sensor inputs that acquire simultaneously several biomedical and environmental signals, the interaction techniques used and the feedback mechanisms of the smart ring and the accompanying smartphone application for logging and monitoring the progress of RP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The percentage of acceptance are results of the project’s survey (n = 379 respondents)

References

  1. Al-Awami M, Schillinger M, Gschwandtner ME, Maca T, Haumer M, Minar E (2001) Low level laser treatment of primary and secondary Raynaud’s phenomenon. Vasa

  2. Al-Awami S, Maca T et al (2004) Low level laser therapy for treatment of primary and secondary Raynaud’s phenomenon. Vasa 33:25–29. https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526.33.1.25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Al-Muhtadi J, Shahzad B, Saleem K, et al (2017) Cybersecurity and privacy issues for socially integrated mobile healthcare applications operating in a multi-cloud environment Health Informatics J 1460458217706184. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458217706184

  4. Anderson ME, Moore TL, Lunt M, Herrick AL (2007) The “distal-dorsal difference”: a thermographic parameter by which to differentiate between primary and secondary Raynaud’s phenomenon. Rheumatology 46:533–538. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kel330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Andrews J (1997) Maurice R Raynaud and his protean disease. J Med Biogr 5:46–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/096777209700500110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Benyon D (2010) Designing interactive systems: a comprehensive guide to HCI and interaction design, 2nd edn. Pearson education, Canada, Harlow, England; New York

  7. Beyer H, Holtzblatt K (1997) Contextual design: defining customer-centered systems. Morgan Kaufmann

  8. Bichard J-A, Coleman R, Langdon P (2007) Does my stigma look big in this? Considering acceptability and desirability in the inclusive Design of Technology Products. In: Universal Acess in human computer interaction. Coping with Diversity. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 622–631

  9. Block JA, Sequeira W (2001) Raynaud’s phenomenon. Lancet 357:2042–2048. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)05118-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bodine K, Gemperle F (2003) Effects of functionality on perceived comfort of wearables. In: proceedings of the seventh IEEE international symposium on wearable computers (ISWC’03). Pp 17–00

  11. Brown KM, Middaugh SJ, Haythornthwaite JA, Bielory L (2001) The effects of stress, anxiety, and outdoor temperature on the frequency and severity of Raynaud’s attacks: the Raynaud’s treatment study. J Behav Med 24:137–153. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010758530555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chan M, Estève D, Fourniols J-Y et al (2012) Smart wearable systems: current status and future challenges. Artif Intell Med 56:137–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2012.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chatterjee S, Price A Healthy living with persuasive technologies: framework, issues, and challenges. doi:https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M2859

  14. Chiauzz E, Rodarte C, DasMahapatra P (2017) Patient-centered activity monitoring in the self-management of chronic health conditions. BMC Med 13:77–77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0319-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cho G (2010) Smart clothing: technology and applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cooper A (2014) About face: the essentials of interaction design, 4th edition, 4th edn. John Wiley and Sons, Indianapolis, IN

    Google Scholar 

  17. Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13:319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dinsdale G, Herrick AL (2014) Vascular diagnostics for Raynaud’s phenomenon. J Vasc Diagn Interv 2:127–139. https://doi.org/10.2147/JVD.S52943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dow S, MacIntyre B, Lee J et al (2005) Wizard of Oz support throughout an iterative design process. IEEE Pervasive Comput 4:18–26. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2005.93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dunne LE, Profita H, Zeagler C et al (2014) The social comfort of wearable technology and gestural interaction. In: 2014 36th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society. Pp 4159–4162

  21. Embr Wave (2018) A thermostat for your body. In: Kickstarter https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/embrwave/embr-wave-a-thermostat-for-your-body. Accessed 13 Mar 2018

  22. Farrington C (2016) Wearable technologies and stigma in diabetes: the role of medical aesthetics. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 4:566. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(16)00075-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fensli R, Boisen E (2008) Human factors affecting the Patient’s acceptance of wireless biomedical sensors. In: Biomedical engineering systems and technologies. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 402–412

  24. Finstad K (2006) The system usability scale and non-native English speakers. J Usability Stud 1:185–188

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gemperle F, Kasabach C, Stivoric J et al (1998) Design for wearability. In: digest of papers. Second international symposium on wearable computers (cat. No.98EX215). Pp 116–122

  26. Goodwin K (2009) Designing for the digital age: how to create human-centered products and services, annotated edition. John Wiley & Sons

  27. Gothelf J, Seiden J (2013) Lean UX: applying lean principles to improve user experience. O’Reilly Media, Inc.

  28. Herrick AL (2012) The pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of Raynaud phenomenon. Nat Rev Rheumatol 8:469–479. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2012.96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hirschl M, Katzenschlager R, Ammer K et al (2002) Double-blind, randomised, placebo controlled low level laser therapy study in patients with primary Raynaud’s phenomenon. Vasa 31:91–94. https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526.31.2.91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hirschl M, Katzenschlager R, Francesconi C, Kundi M (2004) Low level laser therapy in primary Raynaud’s phenomenon--results of a placebo controlled, double blind intervention study. J Rheumatol 31:2408–2412

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hirschl M, Hirschl K, Lenz M et al (2006) Transition from primary Raynaud’s phenomenon to secondary Raynaud’s phenomenon identified by diagnosis of an associated disease: results of ten years of prospective surveillance. Arthritis Rheum 54:1974–1981. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.21912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Holtzblatt K, Wendell JB, Wood S (2004) Rapid contextual design: a how-to guide to key techniques for user-centered design. Morgan Kaufmann

  33. Jean J (2016) Portable Raynaud Monitoring Device. https://hackaday.io/project/17998-portable-raynaud-monitoring-device

  34. Karahanoğlu A, Erbuğ Ç (2011) Perceived qualities of smart wearables: determinants of user acceptance. In: proceedings of the 2011 conference on designing pleasurable products and interfaces. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 26:1–26:8

    Google Scholar 

  35. Karavidas MK, Tsai P-S, Yucha C et al (2006) Thermal biofeedback for primary Raynaud’s phenomenon: a review of the literature. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 31:203–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-006-9018-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kim W-S, Calderhead RG (2011) Is light-emitting diode phototherapy (LED-LLLT) really effective? Laser Ther 20:205–215. https://doi.org/10.5978/ISLSM.20.205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kim YW, Yoon SH, Hwangbo H, Ji YG (2017) Development of a user experience evaluation framework for wearable devices. In: Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Applications, Services and Contexts. Springer, Cham, pp 53–67

  38. Kirk S (2014) The wearables revolution: is standardization a help or a hindrance?: mainstream technology or just a passing phase? IEEE Consum Electron Mag 3:45–50. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCE.2014.2345996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Klippel JH (1991) Raynaud’s phenomenon: the French tricolor. Arch Intern Med 151:2389–2393. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1991.00400120035006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kurley M, Gore V, Noonan L (2016) Heated glove and method of controlling the heating of a glove

  41. Li H, Wu J, Gao Y, Shi Y (2016) Examining individuals’ adoption of healthcare wearable devices: an empirical study from privacy calculus perspective. Int J Med Inf 88:8–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.12.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Li X, Dunn J, Salins D et al (2017) Digital health: tracking Physiomes and activity using wearable biosensors reveals useful health-related information. PLoS Biol 15:e2001402. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Lupton D (2013) The digitally engaged patient: self-monitoring and self-care in the digital health era. Soc Theory Health 11:256–270. https://doi.org/10.1057/sth.2013.10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Lymberis A (2003) Smart wearables for remote health monitoring, from prevention to rehabilitation: current R D, future challenges. 4th Int IEEE EMBS Spec Topic Conf Inform Technol Appl Biomed 2003. IEEE: 272–275

  45. Marcus S, Weiner SR, Suzuki SM, Kwan L (1991) Raynaud’s syndrome. Postgrad Med 89:171–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.1991.11700870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Maricq HR, Valter I, Maricq JG (1998) An objective method to estimate the severity of Raynaud phenomenon: digital blood pressure response to cooling. Vasc Med 3:109–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1358836X9800300204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Merkel PA, Herlyn K, Martin RW et al (2002) Measuring disease activity and functional status in patients with scleroderma and Raynaud’s phenomenon: outcome measures for RP in SSc. Arthritis Rheum 46:2410–2420. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.10486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. NHLBI (2009) Heart & Vascular Diseases: Raynaud’s: what is Raynaud’s?

  49. Nielsen J (1993) Usability engineering, 1st ed. Morgan Kaufmann

  50. Norman DA, Draper SW (1986) User centered system design: new perspectives on human-computer interaction. Taylor & Francis

  51. Oumnia K (2017) Semelle chauffante pour chaussure

  52. Pantelopoulos A, Bourbakis NG (2010) A survey on wearable sensor-based systems for health monitoring and prognosis. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part C Appl Rev 40:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCC.2009.2032660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Parette P, Scherer M (2004) Assistive technology use and stigma. Educ Train Dev Disabil 39:217–226. https://doi.org/10.2307/23880164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Park S, Jayaraman S (2003) Enhancing the quality of life through wearable technology. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 22:41–48. https://doi.org/10.1109/MEMB.2003.1213625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Patel S, Park H, Bonato P et al (2012) A review of wearable sensors and systems with application in rehabilitation. J Neuro Eng Rehabil 9:21. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-9-21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Patel MS, Asch DA, Volpp KG (2015) Wearable devices as facilitators, not drivers, of health behavior change. Jama 313:459–459. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.14781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Paul G, Irvine J (2014) Privacy implications of wearable health devices. In: proceedings of the 7th international conference on security of information and networks. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 117:117–117:121

  58. Piwek L, Ellis DA, Andrews S, Joinson A (2016) The rise of consumer health wearables: promises and barriers. PLoS Med 13:e1001953–e1001953. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Preece J, Sharp H, Rogers Y (2015) Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction, 4 edition. Wiley

  60. Rantakari J, Inget V, Colley A, Häkkilä J (2016) Charting design preferences on wellness wearables. In: Proceedings of the 7th augmented human international conference 2016 on - AH’16. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, pp 1–4

  61. Rodgers M (2013) Primary Raynaud’s phenomenon. N Engl J Med 368:1344–1344. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMicm1209600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Rubin J, Chisnell D, Spool J (2008) Handbook of usability testing: how to plan, design, and conduct effective tests, 2nd edn. Wiley, Indianapolis, IN

  63. Ruiz A (2012) Is low-level laser therapy an effective treatment for patients with primary Raynaud’s phenomenon?

  64. Schnall R, Higgins T, Brown W et al (2015) Trust, perceived risk, perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness as factors related to mHealth technology use. Stud Health Technol Inform 216:467–471

    Google Scholar 

  65. Schwirtz A (2002) The comfort assessment of wearable computers. In: proceedings of the 6th IEEE international symposium on wearable computers. IEEE computer society, Washington, DC, USA, pp 65–

  66. Silva SED (2017) Examining developments and applications of wearable devices in modern society, 1st edn. IGI Global, Hershey, PA

  67. Smith MJ, Shames S, Gibson M, Cohen-Tanugi D (2015) Methods and apparatuses for manipulating temperature

  68. Stavrakis M (2009) Interaction for design: a theoretical framework for contextual collaboration. Ph. D thesis, University of the Aegean

  69. Taket A, White L (2000) Partnership and participation: decision-making in the multiagency setting, 1st ed. Wiley

  70. Vredenburg K, Mao J-Y, Smith PW, Carey T (2002) A survey of user-centered design practice. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 471–478

    Google Scholar 

  71. Wechsung I (2014) An evaluation framework for multimodal interaction. Springer International Publishing, Cham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  72. Wigley FM (2002) Raynaud’s phenomenon. N Engl J Med 347:1001–1008. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcp013013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Wigley FM, Wise RA, Schwartz PD et al (2005) Ambulatory surface skin temperature monitor

  74. Zhang Y, Qiu M, Tsai C-W et al (2017) Health-CPS: healthcare cyber-physical system assisted by cloud and big data. IEEE Syst J 11:88–95. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2015.2460747

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Product & Systems Design Engineering, University of the Aegean, Syros, Greece

    Konstantinos Partheniadis & Modestos Stavrakis

Authors
  1. Konstantinos Partheniadis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Modestos Stavrakis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Modestos Stavrakis.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Partheniadis, K., Stavrakis, M. Design and evaluation of a digital wearable ring and a smartphone application to help monitor and manage the effects of Raynaud’s phenomenon. Multimed Tools Appl 78, 3365–3394 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6514-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6514-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation