Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Towards energy efficient duty cycling in underwater wireless sensor networks

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks devices are usually battery powered and thereby their lifetime is limited. This issue leads to lose data measurements and thus to a performance loss of the underlying UWSN application. It also increases the maintenance cost in Internet of Underwater Things scenarios with a huge number of UWSN devices. Additionally, the unique characteristics of UWSNs pose several constraints such as the high energy consumption, long propagation delay, and node mobility. Duty Cycle management is one of the key technologies to solve this issue. In this context, the use of duty cycle based algorithms for opportunistic, autonomous and energy efficient duty cycle management can mitigate the undesirable impact of underwater communications, consequently, improve the overall efficiency of the algorithms designed for the UWSNs. In this article, we study the energy efficient data collection for asynchronous duty cycle MAC protocols for underwater sensor networks. To this end, we improve two previously proposed receiver initiated MAC protocols that use a nodes, (1) residual energy, and (2) its sleep-awake pattern to improve the overall network lifetime. We show that the considerations made in the protocols have a great impact on the performance of the network. Our results show that the protocols minimize the collisions while alleviating the need for excessive handshake and also the average active time of a node is minimized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Casari P, Zorzi M (2011) Protocol design issues in underwater acoustic networks. Comput Commun 34(17):2013–2025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cattani M, Loukas A, Zimmerling M, Zuniga M, Langendoen K (2016) Staffetta: smart duty-cycling for opportunistic data collection. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM conference on embedded network sensor systems CD-ROM (SenSys ’16). ACM, pp 56–69

  3. Chirdchoo N, Soh WS, Chua KC (2007) Aloha-based MAC protocols with collision avoidance for underwater acoustic networks. In: INFOCOM 2007. 26th IEEE international conference on computer communications. IEEE. IEEE, pp 2271–2275

  4. Chirdchoo N, Soh WS, Chua KC (2008) RIPT: a receiver-initiated reservation-based protocol for underwater acoustic networks. IEEE J Select Areas Commun 26(9):1744–1753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Climent S, Capella JV, Meratnia N, Serrano JJ (2012) Underwater sensor networks: a new energy efficient and robust architecture. Sensors 2012, 12:704–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Coutinho RW, Boukerche A, Vieira LF, Loureiro AA (2015) Modeling and analysis of opportunistic routing in low duty-cycle underwater sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM international conference on modeling, analysis and simulation of wireless and mobile systems. ACM, pp 125– 132

  7. Coutinho RW, Boukerche A, Vieira LF, Loureiro AA (2016) Modeling the sleep interval effects in duty-cycled underwater sensor networks. In: 2016 IEEE international conference on communications (ICC). IEEE, pp 1–6

  8. Coutinho RW, Boukerche A, Vieira LF, Loureiro AA (2018) Underwater wireless sensor networks: a new challenge for topology control–based systems. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 51(1):19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ghadimi E, Landsiedel O, Soldati P, Duquennoy S, Johansson M (2014) Opportunistic routing in low duty-cycle wireless sensor networks. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks (TOSN) 10(4):67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Guo X, Frater MR, Ryan MJ (2009) Design of a propagation-delay-tolerant MAC protocol for underwater acoustic sensor networks. IEEE J Ocean Eng 34(2):170–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Harris IIIAF, Stojanovic M, Zorzi M (2009) Idle-time energy savings through wake-up modes in underwater acoustic networks. Ad Hoc Networks 7(4):770–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hong L, Hong F, Yang B, Guo Z (2013) ROSS: receiver oriented sleep scheduling for underwater sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM international conference on underwater networks and systems. ACM, p 4

  13. Kao CC, Lin YS, Wu GD, Huang CJ (2017) Comprehensive study on the internet of underwater things: applications, challenges, and channel models. Sensors 17 (7):1477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li X, Zhu M, Wu Y (2015) Low-power system design for underwater acoustic modems. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on underwater networks & systems. ACM, p 38

  15. Liao Z, Li D, Chen J (2015) A handshake based ordered scheduling MAC protocol for underwater acoustic local area networks. Int J Distrib Sens Netw 11(1):984370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liao WH, Lin YC, Kuai SC (2014) A receiver-initiated MAC protocol for underwater acoustic sensor networks. In: 2014 international conference on information networking (ICOIN). IEEE, pp 1–6

  17. Lin B, Guo W, Xiong N, Chen G, Vasilakos AV, Zhang H (2016) A pretreatment workflow scheduling approach for big data applications in multicloud environments. IEEE Trans Netw Serv Manage 13(3):581–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lurton X (2002) An introduction to underwater acoustics: principles and applications. Springer Science & Business Media, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Molins M, Stojanovic M (2007) Slotted FAMA: a MAC protocol for underwater acoustic networks. In: OCEANS 2006-Asia Pacific. IEEE, pp 1–7

  20. Ng HH, Soh WS, Motani M (2010) ROPA: a MAC protocol for underwater acoustic networks with reverse opportunistic packet appending. In: Wireless communications and networking conference. Sydney, NSW, pp 1–6

  21. Noh Y, Lee U, Han S, Wang P, Torres D, Kim J, Gerla M (2014) DOTS A propagation delay-aware opportunistic MAC protocol for mobile underwater networks. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 13(4):766– 782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Park MK, Rodoplu V (2007) UWAN-MAC An energy-efficient MAC protocol for underwater acoustic wireless sensor networks. IEEE J Ocean Eng 32(3):710–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sanchez A, Blanc S, Yuste P, Piqueras I, Serrano JJ (2011) A low-power wake-up system for underwater wireless sensor modems. In: Proceedings of the 6th ACM international workshop on underwater networks. ACM, p 18

  24. Sendra S, Lloret J, Jimenez JM, Parra L (2016) Underwater acoustic modems. IEEE Sens J 16(11):4063–4071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Su R, Venkatesan R, Li C (2016) An energy-efficient asynchronous wake-up scheme for underwater acoustic sensor networks. Wirel Commun Mob Comput 16 (9):1158–1172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Syed AA, Ye W, Heidemann J (2008) T-Lohi: a new class of MAC protocols for underwater acoustic sensor networks. In: INFOCOM 2008. The 27th conference on computer communications. IEEE. IEEE, pp 231–235

  27. Vieira LF, Kong J, Lee U, Gerla M (2006) Analysis of aloha protocols for underwater acoustic sensor networks. Extended abstract from WUWNet 6

  28. Wills J, Ye W, Heidemann J (2006) Low-power acoustic modem for dense underwater sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM international workshop on underwater networks. ACM, pp 79–85

  29. Xiong N, Vasilakos AV, Yang LT, Song L, Pan Y, Kannan R, Li Y (2009) Comparative analysis of quality of service and memory usage for adaptive failure detectors in healthcare systems. IEEE J Select Areas Commun 27(4):495–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Xiong N, Jia X, Yang LT, Vasilakos AV, Li Y, Pan Y (2010) A distributed efficient flow control scheme for multirate multicast networks. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 21(9):1254–1266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yaqub MA, Khan MT, Ahmed SH, Kim D (2018) Receiver-initiated dynamic duty cycle scheduling schemes for underwater wireless sensor networks. In: 2018 15th IEEE annual consumer communications & networking conference (CCNC). IEEE, pp 1–6

  32. Zheng H, Guo W, Xiong N (2017) Kernel-based compressive sensing approach for mobile data gathering in wireless sensor network systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

  33. Zorzi F, Stojanovic M, Zorzi M (2010) On the effects of node density and duty cycle on energy efficiency in underwater networks. IEEE

Download references

Acknowledgment

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2016R1D1A3B01015510).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dongkyun Kim.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yaqub, M.A., Ahmed, S.H., Bouk, S.H. et al. Towards energy efficient duty cycling in underwater wireless sensor networks. Multimed Tools Appl 78, 30057–30079 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6924-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6924-2

Keywords

Navigation