Skip to main content
Log in

Static object imaging features recognition algorithm in dynamic scene mapping

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In dynamic scene monocular visual SLAM, it is important to recognize static object imaging features for mapping. The optical flow of noise and the object moving in the same orientations would have the same orientations of static feature for two frames image, that would disturb static feature point recognition. Because the translational motion optical flow orientations method judges with optical flow of single feature point and translational motion orientations, it is not reliable for static feature point recognition. Therefore, a 3D motion segmentation combined for static object imaging features recognition is proposed, which clusters the same optical flow of feature points in 3D motion subspace, including orientations and amplitude of translation and rotation. The simulation results show that the proposed static object imaging features recognition method improves the recognition correct rate and reliability of static features. So, it is effective for static object imaging features recognition in dynamic scene mapping.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bideau P, Learned-Miller E (2016) It’s moving! A probabilistic model for causal motion segmentation in moving camera videos[C]. European Conference on Computer Vision, p 433–449.

  2. Chen G, Lerman G (2009) Motion segmentation by scc on the hopkins 155 database[C]. 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCV Workshops). IEEE, p 759–764

  3. Civera J, Grasa OG, Davison AJ, et al (2009) 1-point RANSAC for EKF-based structure from motion[C]. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2009. IROS 2009. IEEE, p 3498–3504

  4. Civera J, Grasa OG, Davison AJ et al (2010) 1-Point RANSAC for extended Kalman filtering: application to real-time structure from motion and visual odometry[J]. J Field Rob 27(5):609–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Forbes C, Evans M, Hastings N, et al (2011) von Mises Distribution[J]. Statistical Distributions, Fourth Edition, p 191–192.

  6. Kundu A, Krishna KM, Sivaswamy J (2009) Moving object detection by multi-view geometric techniques from a single camera mounted robot[C]. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2009. IROS 2009. IEEE, p 4306–4312

  7. Kundu A, Krishna KM, Jawahar CV (2010) Realtime motion segmentation based multibody visual SLAM[C]. Proceedings of the Seventh Indian Conference on Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing. ACM, p 251–258.

  8. Kundu A, Jawahar CV, Krishna KM (2010) Realtime moving object detection from a freely moving monocular camera[C]. 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO). IEEE, p 1635–1640.

  9. Lucas B D, Kanade T (1981) An iterative image registration technique with an application to stereo vision[J].:674–679

  10. Mair E, Hager GD, Burschka D, et al (2010) Adaptive and generic corner detection based on the accelerated segment test[C]. European conference on Computer vision. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, p 183–196.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Migliore D, Rigamonti R, Marzorati D, et al (2009) Use a single camera for simultaneous localization and mapping with mobile object tracking in dynamic environments[C]. ICRA Workshop on Safe navigation in open and dynamic environments: Application to autonomous vehicles, p 12–17

  12. Mur-Artal R, Montiel JMM, Tardos JD (2015) ORB-SLAM: a versatile and accurate monocular SLAM system[J]. IEEE Trans Robot 31(5):1147–1163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Namdev R K, Kundu A, Krishna K M, et al (2012) Motion segmentation of multiple objects from a freely moving monocular camera[C]. 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, p 4092–4099.

  14. Narayana M, Hanson A, Learned-Miller E (2013) Coherent motion segmentation in moving camera videos using optical flow orientations[C]. 2013 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). IEEE, p 1577–1584

  15. Nister D (2005) Preemptive RANSAC for live structure and motion estimation [J]. Mach Vis Appl 16(5):321–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Perera LDL, Wijesoma WS, Adams MD (2004) On multidimensional assignment data association for simultaneous robot localization and mapping[C]. 2004 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. ICRA'04. IEEE, 2004, 1:860–865

  17. Rodríguez-Canosa GR, Thomas S, Del Cerro J et al (2012) A real-time method to detect and track moving objects (DATMO) from unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) using a single camera[J]. Remote Sens 4(4):1090–1111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rosten E, Drummond T (2006) Machine learning for high-speed corner detection[C]. European conference on computer vision. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, p 430–443.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Rosten E, Porter R, Drummond T (2010) Faster and better: a machine learning approach to corner detection[J]. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 32(1):105–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shi J (1994) Good features to track[C]. 1994 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1994. IEEE, p 593–600

  21. Shi J, Malik J (2000) Normalized cuts and image segmentation[J]. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 22(8):888–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tan W, Liu H, Dong Z, et al (2013) Robust monocular SLAM in dynamic environments[C]. 2013 IEEE International Symposium on. IEEE Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), p 209–218

  23. Xu W, Li P, Han B (2012) Monocular visual SLAM of unmanned helicopter based on 2-point RANSAC[J]. Robot 34(1):64–71

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yan J, Pollefeys M (2006) A general framework for motion segmentation: Independent, articulated, rigid, non-rigid, degenerate and non-degenerate[C]. European conference on computer vision. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, p 94–106.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Yan J, Pollefeys M (2008) A factorization-based approach for articulated nonrigid shape, motion and kinematic chain recovery from video[J]. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 30(5):865–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Shaanxi Province Key Research and Development program (Program No. 2018GY-184), and supported by the Program for Innovative Science and Research Team of Xi’an Technological University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junchai Gao.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao, J., Han, B. & Yan, K. Static object imaging features recognition algorithm in dynamic scene mapping. Multimed Tools Appl 78, 33885–33898 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-08148-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-08148-1

Keywords

Navigation