Skip to main content
Log in

A universal design approach to wayfinding and navigation

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the problem of urban accessibility and proposes a system for the generation of accessible paths in an urban university campus. Universal Design has been adopted to explore the different perspectives of the involved stakeholders; an interdisciplinary team has iteractively developed a web application targeted at public administrators and two versions of a mobile app (one for Android and one for iOS) to be used by citizens. The mobile app is able to propose and guide users on paths that best fit their characteristics and preferences; for example, if a user declares some motor and/or visual impairement, the app proposes paths that avoid the architectural barriers related to such impairments. Not only pedestrian paths are considered in the system, but also routes for private cars or public transportation, and thus information about reserved parking lots and limited traffic zones are also managed. The app has been currently tailored to the campus of the University of Brescia, which is distributed in different districts of Brescia, a town in northern Italy; however, it can be easily scaled to other organizations or whole towns, since Google Maps and its APIs have been used as mapping service. Twenty five participants, including blind people and persons with motor disabilities, have been involved in the evaluation of the usability and accessibility of the two versions of the mobile app.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arenghi A, Belometti S, Brignoli F, Fogli D, Gentilin F, Plebani N (2018) UniBS4All: a Mobile application for accessible Wayfinding and navigation in an Urban University campus. In: Proceedings of the 4th EAI International Conference on Smart Objects and Technologies for Social Good (Goodtechs '18). ACM, New York, 124–129

  2. Arenghi A, Garofolo I, Laurìa A (2016) On the relationship between universal and particular in architecture. In: Petrie H, Darzentas J, Walsh T, Swallow D, Sandoval L, Lewis A, Power C (eds) Universal Design 2016: learning from the past, designing for the future, Studies in health technologies and informatics, vol 229. IOS Press, Amsterdam, Berlin, Washington DC, pp 31–39

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arondi S, Baroni P, Fogli D, Mussio P (2002) Supporting co-evolution of users and systems by the recognition of interaction patterns. In: Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI '02), ACM, New York, 177-186

  4. Bangor A, Kortum PT, Miller JT (2008) An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. International Journal Human Computer Interaction 24:574–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brooke J, Jordan PW, Weerdmeester B, Thomas A, McLelland IL (1996) SUS: a quick and dirty usability scale. In: Jordan PW, Thomas B, Weerdmeester BA, McClelland AL (eds) Usability evaluation in industry. Taylor and Francis, pp 189–194

  6. Cabitza F, Fogli D, Piccinno A (2014) Fostering participation and co-evolution in sentient multimedia systems. J Vis Lang Comput 25(6):684–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cardonha C, Gallo D, Avegliano P, Herrmann R, Koch F, Borger S (2013) A crowdsourcing platform for the construction of accessibility maps. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A ‘13). ACM, New York, article 26, 4 pages

  8. Comai S, De Bernardi E, Matteucci M, Salice F (2017) Maps for Easy Paths (MEP): Enriching Maps with Accessible Paths Using MEP Traces. In: Gaggi O, Manzoni P, Palazzi C, Bujari A, Marquez-Barja J (eds) Smart Objects and Technologies for Social Good (GOODTECHS 2016), Lecture notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, social informatics and telecommunications engineering, vol 195. Springer, Cham, pp 254-263

  9. Comai S, De Bernardi E, Matteucci M, Salice F (2017) Maps for easy paths (MEP): accessible paths tracking and reconstruction. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Internet of Things 17(9):e3

  10. Comai S, De Bernardi E, Salice F, Vali A (2019) Maps for easy paths (MEP): a Mobile application for City accessibility. In: S. Paiva (ed.), Mobile Solutions and Their Usefulness in Everyday Life, EAI/Springer innovations in communication and computing, 105-125

  11. Comai S, Kayange D, Mangiarotti R, Matteucci M, Yavuz SU, Valentini F (2015) Mapping City accessibility: review and analysis. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 217:325–331

    Google Scholar 

  12. Delnevo G, Monti L, Vignola F, Salomoni P, Mirri S (2018) AlmaWhere: a prototype of accessible indoor wayfinding and navigation system. In: Proceedings 2018 15th IEEE Annual Consumer Communications Networking Conference (CCNC 2018), 1–6

  13. Depari A, Flammini A, Fogli D, Magrino P (2018) Indoor localization for evacuation management in emergency scenarios. Proceedings 2018 IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 and IoT, Brescia, 146–150

  14. Fischer G, Fogli D, Piccinno A (2017) Revisiting and broadening the meta-design framework for end-user development. In: Paternò F, Wulf V (eds) New Perspectives in End-User Development. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 61–97

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Fischer G, Giaccardi E (2006) Meta-design: a framework for the future of end user development. In: Lieberman H, Paternò F, Wulf V (eds) End User Development. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 427–457

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Fogli D, Colosio S, Sacco M (2010) Managing accessibility in local E-government websites through end-user development: a case study. International Journal Universal Access in the Information Society 9(1):35–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fogli D, Parasiliti PL, Bernareggi C (2014) A universal design resource for rich internet applications based on design patterns. International Journal Universal Access in the Information Society 13:205–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fogli D, Sansoni D, Trivella E, Arenghi A, Passamani I (2018) Advanced interaction Technologies for Accessible and Engaging Cultural heritage. In: Guidi B, Ricci L, Calafate C, Gaggi O, Marquez-Barja J (eds) Smart objects and Technologies for Social Good. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 364–373

  19. Iwarsson S, Stahl A (2003) Accessibility, usability and universal design-positioning and definition of concepts describing person-environment relationships. Disabil Rehabil 25(2):7–66

    Google Scholar 

  20. Karimi HA, Zhang L, Benner JG (2013) Personalized accessibility maps (PAMs) for communities with special needs. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Web and Wireless Geographical Information Systems (W2GIS’13). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 199–213

  21. Karimi HA, Zhang L, Benner JG (2014) Personalized accessibility map (PAM): a novel assisted wayfinding approach for people with disabilities. Annals of GIS 20(2):99–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lauría A (2012) I piani per l’accessibilitá. Gangemi Editore, Roma (In Italian)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mehigan TJ, Pitt I (2012) Harnessing wireless Technologies for Campus Navigation by blind students and visitors. In: Miesenberger K, Karshmer A, Penaz P, Zagler W (eds) Computers Helping People with Special Needs. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 67–74

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Melis A, Mirri S, Prandi C, Prandini M, Salomoni P, Callegati F (2018) Integrating personalized and accessible itineraries in MaaS ecosystems through microservices. Mobile Networks and Applications 23(1):167–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mirri S, Prandi C, Salomoni P (2016) Personalizing pedestrian accessible way-finding with mPASS. In: Proceedings 2016 13th IEEE Annual Consumer Communications Networking Conference (CCNC 2016), 1119–1124

  26. Nielsen J (1994) Usability engineering. Academic Press, San Diego

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Palazzi CE, Teodori L, Roccetti M (2010) Path 2.0: a participatory system for the generation of accessible routes. In: Proceedings 2010 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, 1707–1711

  28. Pittarello F, De Faveri A (2006) Improving access of elderly people to real environments: a semantic based approach. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI 2006), 364-368

  29. Prandi C, Mirri S, Ferretti S, Salomoni P (2017) On the need of trustworthy sensing and crowdsourcing for urban accessibility in Smart City. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology 18(1):4:1–4:21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Prandi C, Roccetti M, Salomoni P, Nisi V, Nunes NJ (2017) Fighting exclusion: a multimedia mobile app with zombies and maps as a medium for civic engagement and design. Multimed Tools Appl 76(4):4951–4979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Prandi C, Salomoni P, Mirri S (2014) mPASS: integrating people sensing and crowdsourcing to map urban accessibility. In: Proceedings 2014 IEEE 11th Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC 2014). 591–595

  32. Reichheld FF (2003) The one number you need to grow. Harv Bus Rev 81(12):46–55

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rosson MB, Carroll JM (2001) Usability engineering: scenario-based development of human-computer interaction. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  34. Shigeno K, Borger S, Gallo D, Herrmann R, Molinaro M, Cardonha C, Koch F, Avegliano P (2013) Citizen sensing for collaborative construction of accessibility maps. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A ‘13). ACM, New York, article 24, 2 pages.

  35. Story MF, Mueller JL, Mace RL (1998) The universal design file. Designing for People of All Ages and Abilities. Center for Universal Design, NC State University

  36. United Nations (UN) (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development (a/R/70/1), New York

  37. United Nations (UN) (2017) New urban agenda – habitat III (a/R/71/256), New York

  38. Vescovo F (1992) L’accessibilità urbana: considerazioni di base e concetti introduttivi. In: Paesaggio Urbano, n. 1/92, Maggioli (In Italian)

  39. Vitiello G, Sebillo M, Fornaro L, Di Gregorio M, Cirillo S, De Rosa M, Fuccella V, Costagliola G (2018) Do you like my outfit?: Cromnia, a mobile assistant for blind users. In: Proceedings of the 4th EAI International Conference on Smart Objects and Technologies for Social Good (Goodtechs '18). ACM, New York, 249–254

  40. WCAG 2.1, Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1, W3C Recommendation 5 June 2018. Retrieved January 30, 2019 from https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research herein presented has been carried out within the Interdepartmental Laboratory Brixia Accessibility Lab (BrAL) of the University of Brescia. The authors would like to thank all the participants in the user study. A special thank to Simone Belometti, Francesca Brignoli and Nicola Plebani for their contribution to the development of the UniBS4All system.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniela Fogli.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fogli, D., Arenghi, A. & Gentilin, F. A universal design approach to wayfinding and navigation. Multimed Tools Appl 79, 33577–33601 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-08492-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-08492-2

Keywords

Navigation